The ignorance of the Constitution is bi-partisan and not limited to one political party, and in particularly the ignorance of members of Congress
pertaining to the Constitution has become a common place phenomenon. Consider this exchange between Speaker of the House Nanci Pelosi and a
reporter:
Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi looked like a deer caught in the blinding headlight of an oncoming freight train, her expression frozen in
either ignorance or fear. It has always been difficult to distinguish between the two in her. But the malice in her words was palpable.
CNSNews.com: Madam Speaker, where specifically does the Constitution grant Congress the authority to enact an individual health insurance mandate?
Pelosi: Are you serious? Are you serious?
CNSNews.com: Yes, yes, I am.
Pelosi then shook her head before taking a question from another reporter. Her press spokesman, Nadeam Elshami, then told CNSNews.com that asking the
speaker of the House where the Constitution authorized Congress to mandate that individual Americans buy health insurance was not a "serious
question."
You can put this on the record, said Elshami. That is not a serious question. That is not a serious question.
www.capitalismmagazine.com...
However, after this exchange Elshami later issued a
press release stating that it was the Commerce
Clause that empowered Congress to legislate insurance mandates. Not a serious question? Why then issue such a press release?
Patrick Leahy (D-Vermont), defends the
federal mandate to purchase health insurance by pointing to federal speed limit laws on federal highways, and Steny Hoyer (D-Maryland) invokes the
Welfare Clause in order to justify the federal mandate. There is not even agreement on a party level as to what Clause of the Constitution actually
grants Congress the authority to make such a mandate, let alone an understanding of the Constitution in general.
From the other party there is the infamous remark by
Rick Santorum
(R-Pennsylvania), asserting that the Constitution does not "grant any right to privacy", clearly ignorant of the existence of the 9th
Amendment, let alone its meaning.
There are many examples of both Republicans and Democrats demonstrating a profound ignorance of the Constitution, and this threads clear attempt to
function as a partisan political party hack does nothing to "deny ignorance" regarding the Constitution, particularly since there is no clear
mandate for the existence of political parties to begin with.