Chinese official for exterminating US population, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 5 times
Topic started on 6-11-2009 @ 10:32 PM by kommunist
Did a quick search and I didn't find anything on this topic. What this Communist Party official says is quite disturbing, if true.

The article was published in July 2009 and is written by Lev Navrozov. He claims that this information was passed on to him from Jonathan Smithson, an Australian (half English half Chinese) who sent him a speech from a Communist party official.

Here are some selected quotes from the article:


Chi Haotian, the Minister of National Defense of China up to 2004 and a top military analyst today, and published by the dissident Chinese newspaper The Epoch Times, sold in English in the English-speaking countries. The space allocated by The Epoch Times to Chi was summarized as follows: "A leading Chinese Communist Party official argues for exterminating the population of the United States."




In Chi's 12-page (8-pt type size) speech, which The Epoch Times published on June 6, 2009, under the title "WWIII: War Is Not Far from Us and Is the Midwife of the Chinese Century," Chi devoted on what is page 2 of The Epoch Times publication to his demonstration that the Chinese are the superior race to win in WWIII its right to the "Chinese century." Says Chi:

"Hitler's Germany had once bragged that the German race was the most superior race on Earth, but the fact is, our nation is far superior to the Germans."



The "Western democracies" have survived owing to the Industrialization, including science and technology producing ever more effective weapons, up to the nuclear bombs in 1945 by the United States and its allies. But in the 20th century it also turned out that Stalin's slave society can also produce no less effective weapons. And in the first decade of the 21st century here is Chi arguing that China should be the first to annihilate the U.S.A. first, to be on the safe side.


I'm sure that this particular official does not represent the majority of the attitudes of the Chinese people towards the west, in particular the US, and its citizens.

That being said, Hitler also did not represent the views of the majority of Germans before his ascent to power.

I would not take this lightly. Militarily, it would make sense to mount an attack on the enemy when they are already in a weakened state. The US government is heavily indebted to many nations around the world (especially the Chinese) . The US military is stretched very thin fighting wars on two fronts, a failing economy and a polarized political climate would make the US ripe for the picking, so to speak.

The Chinese may very well be biding their time, waiting for the right time to pounce.

Is the west asleep?


What China's minister of defense reportedly said about annihilating Americans


Edit: For the record, I am not a communist! The user name was picked without much foresight, and if I could change it I would!

[edit on 6-11-2009 by kommunist]


reply posted on 6-11-2009 @ 11:05 PM by aethernaut
reply to post by Alethea



You are astute and have perfectly mirrored the exact same musings that have passed thru my synapses , as well . Most disturbing , because the government of United States does not reflect it's citizens . The powers in charge of America , have long held they're own agenda and has been hell-bent riding roughshod over it's people , for a long time.



reply posted on 6-11-2009 @ 11:17 PM by Violater1
reply to post by aethernaut


Most eloquently stated Star to you both.
The Chinese have always hated the USA.

to China


reply posted on 6-11-2009 @ 11:48 PM by silver tongue devil
Originally posted by Violater1
reply to
post by aethernaut


Most eloquently stated Star to you both.
The Chinese have always hated the USA.

to China


So they shouldn't hate you, but you get to hate all of them.

Good job leading my example



reply posted on 7-11-2009 @ 12:14 AM by spellbound
reply to post by kommunist



S & F.

I have long been concerned about China, growing in power all the time - nuclear-wise and money-wise, and also being a notoriously inhumane nation. They are inhumane to their own people and animals - can you imagine what they would be like to others? Also, they manufacture so much of what the rest of the world consumes, and they aren't too fussy about making sure it is safe.

If every nation placed a boycott on all goods from China, that would be an effective means of control.


This is a very concerning thread.


reply posted on 7-11-2009 @ 01:48 AM by On the Edge
reply to post by factbeforefiction



I agree. But it wouldn't make any difference,considering the PTB would have been behind them too.

I think they knew it was time for a "historic" president,if you know what I mean.


reply posted on 7-11-2009 @ 03:24 AM by v3_exceed
Originally posted by Jamiethegreat
That guy on drugs? I love to see them win a war vs the U.S.A, even if they started winning on the ground, we'd nuke the hell out of them. NATO forces would combine with U.S.A forces, it'd be one crushing blow to the Chinese forces, which all they have is man power really. This guys a moron. The U.S.A has weapons that would blow away Chinese weapons. This guy needs a reality check. And even if our military is stretched thin, we have rapid deployment all around the world, wouldn't be that hard to move men/equiment to the battlefield. Weh ave military bases all around the world. What does China have? 1.6 billion people that are all crammed into a country smaller than U.S.A. They have so many men, it ould take a hell of a lot of ships to even ships those troops anywhere, like that wouldn't go unnoticed.
[edit on 6-11-2009 by Jamiethegreat]


Wow, am I ever going to get flamed for this....
China, aka the "Yellow Horde" has been a threat for a very long time to the west. If the Soviet Union were to supply transportation for the Chinese to attack the USA, the USA would be screwed. Not only do they have more people, arms and money they have nukes as well. So if you think that the USA will be dropping nukes on itself to stave off the Chinese your sadly mistaken.

The USA with a total population of say 300 Mil, of which many are old, or too young or obese to fight, and China with say 1.6 billion of which many are still able to be conscripted makes it a heavily slanted battle indeed. (no pun) Since we have no idea what weapons the Chinese really have, as they are very tight lipped about it, it is extremely naive to assume they have nothing as good as the USA.

The reality is that the USA had the right to bear arms. This made each US citizen capable of defending their small square. Today, with the stringent gun laws and revocation of many of the privileges that you thought were your rights, this simply isn't the case any more.

If the Chinese decided to invade North America, it is the USA that would surly be in for the fight of it's life. With the support of the Soviet Union, you might find NATO would be very hesitant to commit to either side. Personally I hope this never comes into being, but I am not so naive to think that it would be as easy to stop them as some on this board.

Thanks for reading.
..Ex
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



Virginia House Bill 1160: Nullify the NDAA
  Posted 15 days ago with 10 member flags
The One Party System replaces the Two Party system in the U.S.
  Posted 0 days ago with 8 member flags
pro Israel or aginst them read this asap!
  Posted 19 days ago with 7 member flags
The Solution
  Posted 3 days ago with 7 member flags
2010 Hate Crime Statistics
  Posted 14 days ago with 2 member flags
Ron Paul\'s fans are building like legos
  Posted 14 days ago with 1 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 16 hours ago, 68 replies