Committee confirms:Comply With Pelosi Care or Go To Jail, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 12 times
Topic started on 6-11-2009 @ 03:53 PM by plumranch

Committee confirms:Comply With Pelosi Care or Go To Jail


biggovernment.com
Today, Ranking Member of the House Ways and Means Committee Dave Camp (R-MI) released a letter from the non-partisan Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) confirming that the failure to comply with the individual mandate to buy health insurance contained in the Pelosi health care bill (H.R. 3962, as amended) could land people in jail. The JCT letter makes clear that Americans who do not maintain “acceptable health insurance coverage” and who choose not to pay the bill’s new individual mandate tax (generally 2.5% of income), are subject to numerous civil and criminal penalties, including cri
(visit the link for the full news article)



Related AboveTopSecret.com Discussion Threads:
Pelosi Breaks Pledge to Put Final Health Care Bill Online for 72 Hours Before Vote



mod edit,. to fix spelling in title for clarity

[edit on Fri Nov 6 2009 by DontTreadOnMe]


reply posted on 6-11-2009 @ 04:47 PM by vor78
reply to post by plumranch



The government is brilliant. Absolutely brilliant. The whole point of having a fine is to cover the costs of non-compliant citizens. But what do they do with those citizens who choose not to pay? They throw them in jail...at a cost to the taxpayers of $40,000 or more per year, which is about 40 times what it would cost the health care program itself if the government did NOTHING to punish that non-compliant citizen.

Yep, this is a great plan. If Congress is that dense, how stupid is the rest of this bill?

[edit on 6-11-2009 by vor78]


reply posted on 6-11-2009 @ 04:47 PM by Seiko
reply to post by Jim Scott



...and if they cannot pay?

Are we seeing the re institution of a debtors prison?


reply posted on 6-11-2009 @ 04:52 PM by Jim Scott
Originally posted by Seiko
reply to
post by Jim Scott



...and if they cannot pay?

Are we seeing the re institution of a debtors prison?


Love your avatar.
Not going to be a debtors prison unless Americans pass a law that says there is a debtors prison. We rule.


reply posted on 6-11-2009 @ 04:53 PM by fraterormus
For those that actually read the Letter and the Amended Draft of the Legislation, the Blog posted by the OP takes some liberties with their reporting of this issue.

It is true that according to this Draft, you must either maintain Private, Group, Employer, or State provided Health Care, or face an additional 2.5% Tax Liability over your current Net Adjusted Federal Income Tax, pro-rated for the amount of time that you were uncovered.

However, there is no immediate penalty, Criminal or Civil, for choosing not to have Health Care or choosing not to pay the additional Tax when filing your Federal 1040 with the IRS.

However, if you are audited by the IRS and determined a Tax Evader for refusing to file a 1040 with the IRS, or if you knowingly file a false 1040 with the IRS then the IRS can take you to either Criminal or Civil Court, exactly the same as they do now. (The extreme majority...almost all of the 600+ cases that the IRS files in Court a year, go to Civil Court...primarily because the burden of proof on the IRS is significantly lower in Civil as opposed to Criminal Court.)

So, it is a non-sequitor that this Amended Bill will require you to take Universal Health Insurance or go to jail. It makes no such changes to Criminal or Civil Code. However, you do face an additional 2.5% Penalty to your Adjusted Net Tax Liability for every year that you choose not to.

Whether you choose not to pay the IRS through evasion or to attempt to defraud them is another situation and subject entirely...and that is entirely what any potential punitive decisions made in Criminal or Civil Court would come from. Not from take Health Care or don't. If you evade the IRS or attempt to defraud them and happen through luck of the draw to be Audited, then you should have known the risks before doing such. It's not unlike speeding and eventually being the one getting pulled over.

Chalk this up as another scare tactic on part of the anti-Universal Health Care lobbyists.

However, if you want to complain about the provision that you either have to have Health Care or pay a Tax Penalty of 2.5%, then you've got a valid argument. That rather blows although I understand the reasoning behind it.


reply posted on 6-11-2009 @ 04:56 PM by Seiko
reply to post by fraterormus



You seem fairly balanced in your responses, what do you think of the legality of it?

This differs in car insurance as you can choose not to drive, but this seems like a living tax?
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



On why America is in denial and Ron Paul will not be elected
  Posted 18 days ago with 21 member flags
Study says racists and conservatives are dumb
  Posted 7 days ago with 16 member flags
Is ‘anti-Canadianism’ the new ‘anti-Americanism?’
  Posted 17 days ago with 8 member flags
Clarification on the definition of "natural born citizen"
  Posted 15 days ago with 7 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 15 hours ago, 111 replies
Hollow Earth Theory New Evidence.
  General Conspiracies, Posted 13 hours ago, 88 replies
Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 9 hours ago, 62 replies
Free will
  Philosophy and Metaphysics, Posted 17 hours ago, 54 replies