I can’t see where the limited number of deaths from swine flu justifies what the WHO, and various countries including the US are doing in response
to the “outbreak”. The numbers don’t justify “Pandemic”. Of course that was before the WHO changed the definition. The deaths are minor
when compared with “normal” yearly numbers from regular flu. I would like to think they are being proactive but I can’t help but feel there is
something more sinister in play. Too many things don’t add up.
Dr Rauni Kilde on Swine Flu Conspiracy, page 1
privacy
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 3 times
ATS Members have flagged this thread 3 times
reply posted on 6-11-2009 @ 02:03 PM by ChemBreather
reply to post by liveandletlive
Indeeed, the new guidlines say that there are no needs for large numbers of death for the Pand6 to be issued, just that it is spread in alot of contries.
They could after the new guilines from 2008 Ithink, claim Pand6 level on the seanonal flu, just plain wrong..
Either some thing horrible have happend at a Lab somewhere, and they do have the 'cure' for it, but they can not go public withit for several reasons, or, they are tricking people to get a vaccine that looks like nothing more than Mass Murder by design.......
Indeeed, the new guidlines say that there are no needs for large numbers of death for the Pand6 to be issued, just that it is spread in alot of contries.
They could after the new guilines from 2008 Ithink, claim Pand6 level on the seanonal flu, just plain wrong..
Either some thing horrible have happend at a Lab somewhere, and they do have the 'cure' for it, but they can not go public withit for several reasons, or, they are tricking people to get a vaccine that looks like nothing more than Mass Murder by design.......
reply posted on 6-11-2009 @ 02:34 PM by liveandletlive
reply to post by ChemBreather
My understanding is that since the vaccine is “live” you actually become contagious for several days after being inoculated. So wouldn’t that mean the people around you that haven’t gotten the vaccine are then susceptible to the actual virus?
Baxter makes a “mistake” and sends out a deadly mix of virus that ended up in vaccines which are then distributed for use in humans. Even though the possibility of this “mistake” is technically impossible in a bio safety level 3 environment, Baxter is still unable to explain this mishap. The virus mix once introduced in humans would have created the perfect scenario for a mutation that would have increased the portability and deadliness of the newly formed super virus. That’s covenant!
Then mysteriously the U.S. and WHO react to the few cases of H1N1 as though a serious pandemic had begun. Very weird and almost like they where expecting something more serious. Odd considering A H1N1 is not abnormal. Its RNA is in normal flu. Flu death statistics go up and down and we where in a down period when they reacted. It’s like they where expecting a super flu! Why not last year or next year? Its almost as if they knew to expect a pandemic that was already in the works but just hadn’t presented its self yet.
Things that make you go hmmm…………………
Edit to add: I will s&f to keep this in the front of peoples mind.
[edit on 6-11-2009 by liveandletlive]
My understanding is that since the vaccine is “live” you actually become contagious for several days after being inoculated. So wouldn’t that mean the people around you that haven’t gotten the vaccine are then susceptible to the actual virus?
Baxter makes a “mistake” and sends out a deadly mix of virus that ended up in vaccines which are then distributed for use in humans. Even though the possibility of this “mistake” is technically impossible in a bio safety level 3 environment, Baxter is still unable to explain this mishap. The virus mix once introduced in humans would have created the perfect scenario for a mutation that would have increased the portability and deadliness of the newly formed super virus. That’s covenant!
Then mysteriously the U.S. and WHO react to the few cases of H1N1 as though a serious pandemic had begun. Very weird and almost like they where expecting something more serious. Odd considering A H1N1 is not abnormal. Its RNA is in normal flu. Flu death statistics go up and down and we where in a down period when they reacted. It’s like they where expecting a super flu! Why not last year or next year? Its almost as if they knew to expect a pandemic that was already in the works but just hadn’t presented its self yet.
Things that make you go hmmm…………………
Edit to add: I will s&f to keep this in the front of peoples mind.
[edit on 6-11-2009 by liveandletlive]
Pages: ^^TOP^^
The Devil\'s Chord: The conspiracy to open the portal of consciousness and mystery of the octave
Posted 3 days ago with 158 member flags
Posted 3 days ago with 158 member flags
The Coca Cola Conspiracy: The secret cause for the U.S. obesity epidemic
Posted 14 days ago with 139 member flags
Posted 14 days ago with 139 member flags
Bank of America DOES NOT accept U.S. DOLLARS as payment on mortgages
Posted 7 days ago with 85 member flags
Posted 7 days ago with 85 member flags
The Above Top Secret Web sites are a
wholly owned social content community of
The Above Network, LLC.
This content community relies on
user-generated content from our member contributors.
The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership
who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides
a collaborative venue for free expression.
ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Header data: 0.002 seconds
Page processed in: 0.055 seconds
wholly owned social content community of
The Above Network, LLC.
This content community relies on
user-generated content from our member contributors.
The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership
who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides
a collaborative venue for free expression.
ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Header data: 0.002 seconds
Page processed in: 0.055 seconds
