It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by GenRadek
reply to post by Seventh
You mention the straight "cuts" on the exterior columns as they fall. You forget to mention the fact that at the mechanical floors, all the exterior columns where not staggered like those above and below. It is mentioned in the design and in the FEMA report as well.
Its on page 3, second paragraph:
www.fema.gov...
It could very well explain that issue.
The mechanical floors are seen here as the gray bands:
After a little digging, the mechanical floors were found on: floors 7–8, 41–42, 75–76, and 108–109.
So it is here the splices were all even, which would allow for the columns to appear as if they have been "cut". and dont forget the Skylobbies!
[edit on 11/19/2009 by GenRadek]
Your photos are deliberately misleading. The sections clearly show they did NOT have straight ends, but had jagged sections protruding past the red line drawn over them. That tells me right there that they weren't manufactured that way. They were broken that way.
Let me answer your question with another question- what caused all 500,000 people in lower Manhattan (and parts of New Jersey) to not notice a tremor so powerful that it registered in seismic stations miles away, fourteen and seconds before the towers were hit? The most obvious answer- the tremors recorded *were* from the impact of the plances, and the 14/17 second difference is a timing error of some type. Innuendo of impropriety is still innuendo.
Those tapes were retrieved from Afghanistan, with an unknown chain of custody, so for all I know someone in Afghanistan probably had an uncle that kinda sorta looked like Bin Laden and made a home movie to sell to gullible CIA agents. I myself rely on the bin Laden public statement released on Al Jazeera, where he admitted his involvement-
Bin Laden admits involvement on Al Jazeera Al Jazeera is a favorite media outlet for Al Qaida, so they certainly have their own methods of determining authenticity. The fact that Al Qaida never came forward to denounce the broadcast shows right there they are not contesting it. Plus, Pakistani journalist Hamid Mir personally interviewed Bin Laden shortly after the attack and he all but admitted he had inside information on the attacks. Hamid Mir interview with Osama Bin Laden Hamid Mir himself has said he believes OBL is behind the attacks. Tell me, have *you* ever met and talked to Osama Bin Laden face to face, as he did?
This looks like the beams have been cut as part of the cleanup. What does this prove?
Originally posted by Seventh
Then kindly explain the picture below, if there are no ratchet access holes then the respective section has been cut, also the cuts themselves, the workers used oxy-acetylene for cutting, which leaves tell tall signs, the surface of the cut is scorched all around and relatively smooth, and traces of slag (molten metal) are abundant, also here - Why have all three truss seat fixings been cut out?.
Dave - All data from that day that used specific timings were all using time stamps set to the U.T.C. there are no timing errors here, relative flight data from sources like the radar unit, every single MSM crew, and a whole heap more, all had equipment with 100% accuracy regarding the exact time, to make one mistake would be very unlikely, making two is beyond comprehension, there are reasons that data involving time, do so with intricate precision ie - 07:23:51 and not 07:23. these times are not randomly plucked out of the air by someone, but automatically recorded by instruments set to the U.T.C.
Food for thought regarding plane crashes and seismic reading, the Pentagon impact was a few feet above ground level yet gave no readings whatsoever, what makes you think that planes hitting buildings designed to absorb energy around 1000 feet above ground level would do better?.
October 16, 2001-- An interview with Osama bin Laden was published in a Karachi-based Pakistani daily newspaper, Ummat, on September 28, 2001. In this interview, bin Laden says of the September 11 attacks in the US:
"I have already said that I am not involved in the 11 September attacks in the United States. As a Muslim, I try my best to avoid telling a lie. I had no knowledge of these attacks, nor do I consider the killing of innocent women, children and other humans as an appreciable act. Islam strictly forbids causing harm to innocent women, children and other people. Such a practice is forbidden even in the course of a battle.
Originally posted by The_Zomar
Very good post, I was just about to ask dave if he really thought that the seismic recordings were all broken.
So dave, All the seismic recording stations were in error.
Prove it? You have it backwards once again. The poster of said photo should prove his point.
It would seem that the poster of such a photo should state the time/date/location and show why the beam was not cut by a torch. It certainly looks like it was cut by a torch.
This looks like the beams have been cut as part of the cleanup. What does this prove?
The poster said that there was some proof that these were not cut with a torch. He should provide some statement showing the basis of his claim. Your problem is that you understand very little of the details of these discussions and can only repeat what you read on websites for wingnuts. Why do you do that?
You seem to be very angry.
Your problem is that you understand very little of the details of these discussions and can only repeat what you read on websites for wingnuts. Why do you do that?
You didn't respond to my explanation of why I would ask for any support for an unsupported statement.
Originally posted by impressme
reply to post by pteridine
By the way when are you going to answer my question that I keep asking you.
Why do you believe in the OS and what "creditable Scientific facts" lead you to believe the OS is one hundred present true?
I bet you refuse to answer my question.
In general, the explanations given are consistent with the known facts.
There is no evidence for any other series of events and no detailed proposals for any other series of events to consider.
The many video analyses show buildings falling down. The flyover theory has no support.
There is no evidence for any sort of demolitions.
The rationale provided for such a CD conspiracy is weak.
There are no detailed theories of who, what, when, or how anything other than the OS occurred.
This has been asked for many times but it is hand-waved away with secret explosives set by secret men none of which leave any evidence.
Paint chips are poorly analyzed and claimed to be thermite yet if they were, such a layer would do nothing.
There is the continued simplistic questioning of unexplained details and this is taken as evidence of a coverup.
If it hasn't been investigated ad naseum and completely explained, then somebody must be hiding something.
This will continue on into the future as those who need a conspiracy to believe in will grasp at any straw while the entrepreneurs and egomaniacs take advantage of them.
They are not looking for any truths and they are not denying ignorance.
If anyone had anything at all, there would have been indictments long ago.
They didn't and there weren't.
They still don't and after this amount of time, studying videos with colored lines and arrows will not change that.
The link you provided was about 4.5 minutes long.
The last 30 seconds showed some twisted and torn metal and claimed that it was from explosives.
There is no evidence that this was from anything other than the collapse.