Coast to Coast AM - 04 Nov 2009 - ET Disclosure, page 1

On a personal note, i kind of agree with Stephen Bassett, about the differences in perception between Europeans and Americans, especially on the political side of this subject. The guest also is sure that disclosure is inevitable. Hope you enjoy!

Mod: I did a search, but found nothing. If already posted, please delete.

[edit on 5-11-2009 by lagenese]

reply posted on 6-11-2009 @ 12:15 AM by lagenese

I've listened to the whole series twice. It's amazing how clearly Steven Bassett sees the reality of disclosure. I do know one thing; he's following very closely what David Wilcox said in an earlier interview on coast to coast.

I also see that Steven Bassett is more down to Earth when he explains the mechanism of disclosure, especially from the European point of view.

reply posted on 6-11-2009 @ 04:28 AM by MurrayTORONTO

Listening now... I always love a good c2c interview to sit back and relax and listen to haha.

reply posted on 6-11-2009 @ 04:30 AM by obamalivechat

anyone want to sum it up so im not watching 8 videos?

reply posted on 6-11-2009 @ 06:12 AM by krystalice

At least some one ins't jumping ship into assuming the dates of disclosure this time around.

reply posted on 6-11-2009 @ 07:06 AM by IgnoreTheFacts

I personally think Steven Basset is harmful to this subject, and his actions in the past do nothing more than to shore up the giggle factor so many around here are so keen to promote.

In several past interviews Steven has said that any publicity is good publicity for this subject, not matter who or what.....or how ridiculously laughable it is. I find this to be counterproductive towards the goal of government disclosure....as that will not happen until the mainstream media hits this subject hard and responsibly, but in order to do that we must shed the cloak of "laughablility" that we are saddled with.....thanks to people like Basset and the legions that give these morons a stage.

He did an interview on the Paracast that was pretty revealing..... I can't wait for tools like this guy to sit down and shut up, but the problem is for every moron like him that gets out of the subject, more are willing to jump on stage to take over....I guess the only real solution here is to take away their stage (audience). But that wont happen due to the overwhelming ignorance that permeates this subject.

[edit on 6-11-2009 by IgnoreTheFacts]

reply posted on 6-11-2009 @ 07:14 AM by andy1033

reply to post by lagenese

I totally disagree with you, i do not think these people like him and greer have even thought what it means.

When do people learn, that aliens or government is not there for us.

You all remind me of that scene in independence day, where the people are standing on the roofs and celebrating, while the aliens sh1t all over them.

Naviety in this subject is very bad, and it does bring alot of ridicule to this subject.

Personally i do not want disclosure as i think humans are just mostly scum, who do not deserve it. Something so profound, what would humans do.

If it ever happens we will have more power in our own lifes taken away from governments, and more condescending tripe from people like michio kaku, who is nothing more than a nazi death camp scientist, with a smile.

Do not like basset, and he has not the mind to figure out all the implications, i like how the last caller stumped him, with the fact is what will the government do with all the people they called crazy, and society mocked for so long. The re is a question, that no one has asked on here, and well done for that caller for stumping, the clown basset.

[edit on 11/6/2009 by andy1033]

reply posted on 6-11-2009 @ 07:19 AM by andy1033

Originally posted by lagenese
I also see that Steven Bassett is more down to Earth when he explains the mechanism of disclosure, especially from the European point of view.

The only reason europeans are not as wound up about it, is that american media, have went to town all these years to ridicule the subject. Its not that mush of a ridicule in europe, to talk about ufos and aliens.

Just look at how mexico treats the subject to usa. Just next door, but usa media, just make it into a big laugh, while mexico knows its serious.

American media are the fault, that americans take it as a joke, not the people.

reply posted on 6-11-2009 @ 07:25 AM by lagenese

reply to post by andy1033

If you want to know my opinion on the subject, here it is:

- It wont be the governments who will make it happen
- When humans will be ready, ET's will disclose for all to see
- When they do, it's going to be worldwide, and people will start looking in the air instead of looking on the ground.
- The benevolent ones are not interacting with governments

I posted this interview because i know many people "want" to know.
I see full interaction with the benevolent ones towards the end of the 21st century.
Disclosure will happen before, but it's gonna be very slow, so humans have time to adapt to the "new reality".

Also, i have no particular interest in Stephen Bassett. It's just interesting, that's all.

reply posted on 6-11-2009 @ 07:40 AM by andy1033

reply to post by lagenese

I just think anyone who thinks aliens would have our interests at heart if they have feelings, would be wrong. How do we feel towards animals, we do not care for them, and we have emotions, like empathy etc...

We have no idea if aliens would feel like us. All this bull about oneness, and love everyone is rubbish.

Though i think that if aliens came they would have to operate in our reality and thats where i think we already have weapons, to stop them to a certain extent. I seriously doubt they will care too much, about our need to know, and why should they.

I never said, you as op, where for what bassett said, i just said that he is very naive, and all these people hoping for this, have not really thought it through. I just like how the bloke stumped him at the end. There must be so many reasons why disclosure is bad, compared to any positives.

Why would any government ever want to tell people, they are not in control, of your safety and lifes?

reply posted on 6-11-2009 @ 07:52 AM by lagenese

reply to post by andy1033

Well, the benevolent ones do care about the human race, but not in the way we see it. It's all about the level of consciousness. Consciousness is the next big step for mankind. We cannot compare emotional views on this matter with consciousness, it does not go together. The polarity in our experimental consciousness is the reason disclosure has not happen yet. When any being is fully conscious, there is no more polarity.

The new era that is coming will require conscious beings, to be able to interact with other civilizations throughout the universe.

reply posted on 6-11-2009 @ 08:12 AM by redoubt

Just a quick note or three on the subject of whether ET 'cares' about humanity...

When we apply ourselves to delving what may be the thought processes and motivations of any alien race, we can only apply what we know of ourselves. We have no common frame of reference, besides imagination, to anything that we do not know.

So, to say that ET does or does not this or that, is entirely conjecture based on how we ourselves, view ourselves.

Now, I do understand that there are those who claim to have been... or are still in contact with alien entities and from that, we can rest assured of this or that. But short of a worldwide connection and communication, there is just too much room for logical doubt.

This is all one reason why the UFO community is so very divided unto itself. If we had some fundamental, undeniable truths, then we would have a solid foundation on which to meet. But short of that charter, we are groping in the dark for the light switch and getting mad when someone tries and touches us the wrong way.

Best

[edit on 6-11-2009 by redoubt]

reply posted on 6-11-2009 @ 08:30 AM by lagenese

reply to post by redoubt

Yes, the division in the UFO community is cause by the division in our conscience. That division, also known as polarity, is the reason why disclosure has not happen yet.
When i speak of what i "know", i speak from deep understanding and experience. Consciousness is the key to disclosure. The only exception would be if humans would be a serious "menace" to mankind's survival as a species.
"If we had some fundamental, undeniable truths, then we would have a solid foundation on which to meet."
Even if humans would have the undeniable truth, there would still be divisions between humans on the subject. Some would accept, some would deny and others would be somewhere in between.

[edit on 6-11-2009 by lagenese]

reply posted on 6-11-2009 @ 10:17 AM by lagenese

According to Dr. Pete Peterson in his interview with project Camelot, the disclosure date would be November 27th. His sources revealed that air time was booked for that date with all the major TV stations...
Just goes to prove that some will put dates forward, and other wont, because if it doesn't happen, you loose credibility towards the population...
The main problem is the divisions between humans. That division prevents any concrete action in this disclosure...

Pages: ^^TOP^^