reply to post by poedxsoldiervet
First, my apologies...sometimes I don't filter my words as carefully as I might. I've been fighting this fight for what seems like aeons now and I
get a little impatient at times.
Hmmm, where have you been? Most of the tribes I follow (Apache, Navaho, Sioux, Cheyenne, Cherokee, and Kumeyaay) have long-established industries and
commercial ventures. I have a college education, and have taught many Native American students. And no, I didn't teach history or culture (not
directly, at least): I taught computer science, digital multimedia. Mostly I taught people the mechanics of thinking...
HOW to think, not What
to. The tribes are not as backward as a lot think.
Many years ago, as a college student, I was assigned by the department I worked for (American Indian Studies) to survey Native American students'
records to determine why their graduation rate was so low, and how many credits they would need on average to graduate. What I found was that of our
population of Native American students, most had at least twice as many credits as needed to graduate, but they weren't organized in a way to permit
the issuance of degrees. When I moved on to the personal interview part, the vast majority of the students said the reason was that they studied what
interested them without an eye to a degree because they felt (rather strongly) a degree was pretty pointless, since it wouldn't translate into any
better job opportunities or social acceptance due to prejudice and the way the BIA mandated the use of tribal money. So we had a very highly educated
Native population that was deemed ignorant and lazy by the locals, incompetent to handle their own affairs. many of the older students warned that if
the tribes actually managed to get a commercial enterprise off the ground it would simply be confiscated by local non-Indian business interests as had
been done every time in the past.
Thankfully, though, they did put their knowledge and education to work in positive (and political) ways, and with patience and determination
eventually garnered enough power to begin changing the political climate. It's taken over thirty years of hard work to accomplish and now there is
hope and progress on at least some of the rez's. True, in california it's been casinos, but you take what you can get. And the casino tribes are
diversifying as swiftly as they can.
So put me down as completely, totally, and unwaveringly opposed to assimilation or anything remotely resembling it. We have worked too hard, for too
long, for too many generations to give up now. Sooner or later the tribes will be free again, free of the Americans, free to follow our own ways in
the modern world, free to make our own mistakes and be responsible for them, free to find our own solutions. But to do that we need a land base and a
strong national identity. Becoming just another American is to submit to cultural genocide, to being a person of Indian descent, but not an Apache,
Cheyenne, or Navaho, much like person with French citizenship who was born in the US may be of US descent, but not an American.
I hope you understand the distiction I'm making and why. No one is advocating returning to living in teepees, except at pow-wows and other temporary
gatherings, for which purpose they are technologically vastly superior to anything else. Not ALL tribal inventions were backwards or inferior to
European designs, as you seem to think. Native Americans are fully capable of taking their rightful place among the other nations of the world, if
only the Americans would abide by their obligations and allow it.