Are You Watching It...Or Is It Watching You?!

Looks like a fat kids face from a distance. As for the God and bible reference, there is no God as you were taught. Thus there are no demons as you were taught.

Closest thing to a god introduced into your life were your parents. Notice how your parents have the same characteristics as you were taught about god.

1. You do something termed bad you are disciplined, which is just another word for justified punishment or justified justice.

2. You do something termed good you are rewarded and praised.

If god does exist as religions say...he/she or whatever, is no greater than human.
The only thing that is watching you is a paranoid control freak government.

[edit on 7-11-2009 by superluminal11]

its FAKE! Come on people think about this for a second. Why the heck would you take a picture of the room but not only that but try to get focus on a tv at the same time. People don't do this. "Oh im going to take a picture of my Christmas tree, but ill try to fit as much of the TV into my picture as i can!" Seriously people its common sense. But just my .02cents.

reply to post by divinetragedy79

---

Think of the X Files episode where the crop dusting planes started spraying a chemical that made LCDs tell people to start killing everyone.

Guy gets an oil funnel to the chest, hard to forget.

Same concept here. You were fortunate enough to be aware enough to turn off the radio, others could very well have been implanted and never noticed.

That could explain a lack of public response, rather than someone just targeting you.

Rather, I am glad you are ok, and it is best not to dwell on it.

[edit on 7-11-2009 by GideonHM]

reply to post by mrfire9

---

Why do you think that your common sense is more common sense than the information on a CONSPIRACY WEBSITE?

Come on! Why can't you accept that strange things show up here? Who told you that this was a place to ignore possibilities? You just assume you are aware.

Would you please go back to sleep now? Your government knows what is best for you, and don't forget to get your H1N1 shot! It's good for you. Just ask the WHO, or you can just do what you are told.

I see you only a few months old here, so I'll cut you some slack. I AM not a hard-core skeptic. But when investigating something with outrageous claims, well outrageous proof needs to be provided (or however the saying goes, sorry, I'm running a 103 fever atm)

I've seen the mods put hoax tags up for much less than this. I've seen them drop stuff like this OP to skinkworks within the first three posts..

Please don't piss me off right now, I'm not in the mood. "I think my opinions are the be all end all"? HARDLY.

Whatever you angry about, don't take it out on me. I deal in FACTS, not in spirits and Demons. Maybe you've been burned by charlitons like Blossom Goodchild and Sylvia Brown, or perhaps John Edwards one too many times? and your not in a good mood?

The Fact is the Original photo and the original blowup, ARE NOT the Same image, this has been proven; ad nauseum- throughout this thread.

Stick around here for more than 12 weeks and you too (considering your of sound mind) will start to get annoyed with the Constant Hoaxes that come through here ALL the TIME. I look at every one objectively. Usually, I can't say one way or another whether it's a hoax or not, but we do have image analysis experts here, who can. and 99% they figure out it's a hoax.

But for this Original post. It only takes someone with working eyeballs, and a program like Photoshop to blow up the the TV, to see, that the image bears ZERO resemblance to the blow-up the OP claims some image specialists from "York" produced. The only resemblance is that they both have two eye sockets.

BTW- Sorry if On the Edge (or the OP, sorry if I got your name wrong) already provided names of these so called expects who did this analysis. I missed that But I ask you OP.... Can you post thier names, and some contact information for them when you get a chance? I'd be more than interested in talking to them, and mostly finding out if they're fans of the Thundercats.

But MacATK18, have a good day, and pass that message along to the OP, if you are friends. To please cite the sources that did the original photo analysis back in 96, or was it 90? well whatever yes it's not THAT important to have exact dates, times and names

[edit on 7-11-2009 by Nola213]

Oh. My. God.

So funny yet so wrong.

Heeheehee!! Star for you!
And I agree about the government working on mind control & possibly transmitting thru our electronic equipment!

Update.

I have been able to duplicate this effect on a television screen in real time.

Walk to any TV in your house and say the following chant.

"Ancient spirits of evil,
transform this decayed
form to Mumm-Ra,
the Ever-Living!"

Stand back, TV will then explode.

Hopefully,this is a more adequate picture of the negative!

If you like,I can e-mail you the image(2.90 mb),for further "debunking" study!

You can tell we're still getting the hang of this! I don't know why it didn't center properly. If you go to my profile,it is in my photo album.

Just for the record,here's another of my photos that I can't explain. My daughter was taking photos of a house she was thinking about renting.(Why she took a picture of a plain old wall,I can't say!)

Again,this wasn't visible to the naked eye,but when reviewing them on screen,these light streaks showed up.

I can't explain it.

And there's this one!
This isn't smoke from a cigarette,either.
It wasn't seen in any other photos from that particular roll of film,but doubt I could find the negative if I tried. It's buried in with too many others.
Just another example of,"What the Heck?!"

A different shot of the negative with different ambient lighting. I think my husband may have modified the resolution setting on the camera for this one as well.

While cruising the Internet I ran across these photos. They seem like the OP's pictures. I really don't know what to think about it. Debunkers please take a shot at this one.

I must add to this by saying...

"feel the thunder, feel the roar...thundercats are loose"

Had me laughing when i this!

reply to post by GTORick

---

I wouldn't even attempt to debunk it! Looks pretty serious to me!

By the way,those other photos I talked about,and the long story that goes with it,are on the thread I just posted,"Catch and Release".

reply to post by On the Edge

---

On the Edge,

Thanks for posting the new pics. I don't really have an opinion on a hoax or not...I have about as much technical expertise as your average 85 year old, but regardless the photos are interesting. Please post more if you have them.

Easy!


Long exposure + moving of camera/lights (same as my avatar).



Similar principle, fast moving out of focus white object or smoke. Nothing paranormal whatsoever - these kind of pictures and hype surrounding them makes the genuine people with truly unexplainable images look bad. Can the mods please move this to the HOAX section already? The first images are clearly MUMM-RA's abode.

Snarf.

reply to post by Goathief

---

I'm no expert on these matters,but how can everything else remain in focus and show nothing out of the ordinary? (There was no one smoking in that second photo.)

I've seen photos of this kind in "ghost" categories before. Heck,look at all the interest over mere "orbs"!

I also don't know how to explain why things that aren't visible to the naked eye suddenly become visible once captured.

My daughter,who has had her share of "paranormal experiences" herself took the photo with the window.

You can't argue that certain things are drawn to certain people,for reasons unknown.

Aside from holding the negative in your own hands,what can I do to convince any of you that this is not a hoax,..??

www.ephotozine.com...


Doesn't have to be cigarette smoke... but if you insist that there was none I'd say that you moved a white object in front of the camera.


Indeed, and all of them are utter JUNK and damaging to serious studies of the paranormal. Orbs are either insects or dust particles, that's all there is to it. Nothing paranormal whatsoever, just like your latest two photographs.


Oh my, that one is the most blatant use of a slow shutter speed and an unstable hand I've ever seen - it really is that simple to debunk. Ask yourself this, why would that photograph even imply paranormal to you?


That's only because you want them to be, you are trying to see a paranormal event in anything and everything as a means to justify your beliefs. That's the truth right there.


Even if people were to obtain the negative of the first one you posted it's clearly from the Thundercats and on a television screen - you do the reasoning. It's only unclear to those who are desperately searching for something else.


[edit on 9-11-2009 by Goathief]

It seems like alot of you who are finding fault with these photos as an opportunity to attack my faith,saying I need them to "justify" my beliefs! That is ridiculous!

My faith does not need "justification",and my faith isn't stemming from photos,but from a long-held faith in the gospel of Jesus Christ.

I don't claim these are evidence of anything,except what I considered
to be things I could not explain.

I admit to not knowing,and you claim the opposite,as though you were there.

I do look for reasons to connect what I see to my own personal experience,..who doesn't?

Examine the photo again and tell me if you see any little light indicating that the television is On,as you say.