ATS Debate Tournament: Member Discussion , page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 30 times


reply posted on 7-11-2009 @ 05:12 PM by chissler

ATS Debate Tournament Roster



(Subject to change as more members sign up. Your name being listed here does not guarantee you a spot in the tournament)

1) AllSeeingI
2) vkey08
3) whatukno
4) GUNSINWAR
5) OzWeatherman
6) Snarf
7) hangedman13
8) serbsta
9) dizziedame
10) zazzafrazz
11) Skyfloating
12) ecoparity
13) mblahnikluver
14) stereovoyaged
15) Agent-ATS
16) nyk537





17) habfan1968
18) nixie_nox
19) wormwood13
20) hyperion.martin







The first 16 are our participants at the moment. They are not in the appropriate order just yet. The senior debaters listed will be bumped to the top of the list and guaranteed a seat. The newcomers will be listed in order of who announced their intention to participate first. If a senior debater comes along, they will be slotted in accordingly and everyone below them will bump down the list.

The cut off for the tournament is Sunday, November 15th 2009 @ 12:00AM PST.

On that Monday, all participants will be contacted with their information. Anyone who does not respond within 48 hours will be removed from the list and their seat will be given to a member who is waiting. For example, if that were to happen right now, habsfan1968 would be the first to pick up a vacant seat.

So even though all the seats are currently filled, they can open up quickly. So if you wish to participate, still state your intentions. At this point we're looking at a 16 person tournament, however we may expand it.

Any further questions, send myself, TheBorg or semperfortis a u2u.





[edit on 11-7-2009 by chissler]



reply posted on 7-11-2009 @ 05:18 PM by chissler
reply to post by nixie_nox



The winner is determined by a panel of anonymous judges that read the debate once it has concluded. A critique of both participants and a result is offered to both participants afterwards.

Take a peak in the ATS Debate Forum and you'll see plenty of examples of this.


reply posted on 7-11-2009 @ 05:41 PM by chissler
reply to post by wormwood13



Corrected.

You're on the waiting list because 16 members signed up before you and at this point, we're looking at having a 16 member tournament. If spots open up, which I assure you they will, members from the waiting list will be contacted. I can not guarantee how many will open up, but a few always do.


reply posted on 7-11-2009 @ 05:42 PM by chissler
reply to post by nixie_nox



Participants can not be judges. And judges are 100% anonymous, so requests to be a judge need to be made privately.



reply posted on 7-11-2009 @ 05:43 PM by nixie_nox
reply to post by chissler



Oh my bad. I just meant that if I didn't make into the tournament, I will also play the judge in case. But that seems to be a mute point now.


reply posted on 7-11-2009 @ 06:06 PM by wormwood13
reply to post by chissler



Awww. I was trying to say that I am a seasoned member with a couple of debates under my belt. That's why I quoted from your OP.

Originally posted by chissler
As we've done in the past, spots will be offered to more seasoned debaters over newcomers, if we have more members looking to participate than we can accommodate.


I was just trying to clarify why I wasn't a seasoned debater.


reply posted on 7-11-2009 @ 10:38 PM by serbsta
reply to post by eazyriderl_l



The Debate Forum is a public forum, viewable by all members. So I'm pretty sure you can.


reply posted on 8-11-2009 @ 12:38 AM by whatukno
reply to post by Maxmars



wait your not in this debate tourney?

Oh thank GOD!

I have a snowballs chance in hell now.


reply posted on 8-11-2009 @ 11:16 AM by semperfortis
reply to post by nixie_nox



Research

U2U the Mod for clarification

Those two options should resolve most misunderstanding

Semper
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^