AboveTopSecret.com Video and Media Portal.Books, posters, and more.T-shirts, mouse pads, cups, and bags.Member podcasts.Conspiracy theory wiki.Alternative news headlinesBelowTopSecret.com - off topic and general chit chat.AboveTopSecret.com - conspiracy theories and


 

 

This topic is in the Swine Flu and other Diseases and Pandemics discussion forum.  (rss)


TIME - Jun. 03, 1946 (take a look)




Topic started on 4-11-2009 @ 11:31 PM by TrainDispatcher




From TIME magazine
Monday, Jun. 03, 1946


The other possibility, biological warfare, also had impressive scientific scripture behind it. Wrote General H. H. Arnold in the book One World or None: "It is worth while pointing out that biological warfare, consisting of the spreading of disease, could occupy a position similar to atomic warfare."

Living Killers. For three years, U.S. biological warfare research has been carried on at the University of California under Navy auspices. Virtually nothing has been published about it except that the principal disease under study was "hundreds of years old and one of the greatest killers." But the day after Thomas' original break, other Congressmen, popeyed and anonymous, announced that the Navy had a weapon which could wipe out "all forms of life" in a large city. "It is a germ proposition and is sprayed from airplanes that can fly high enough to be reasonably safe from ground fire. It is quick and certain death."*

While germs are usually specialists, attacking only a limited number of species, some form of biological warfare might be only too practicable. Chances are that pestilence-spreaders would not use old, familiar diseases, but would create new ones by modifying standard bacteria or viruses. With modern knowledge of genetics and biochemistry, this should not be impossible. Human beings would have little natural resistance against such synthetic diseases, which might conceivably spread, in a biological chain reaction, through the world's entire population. Perhaps suitable diseases have already been created in several countries, their organisms kept alive in secret, guarded incubators.

The only defense would be mass immunization in advance. A nation planning aggression would protect its own soldiers and citizens before loosing its high-bred germs upon enemies and innocent bystanders. If all went well, its territory would be left an island of health in a world of poisonous corpses.

So far, no nation's agents had publicly reported such a suspicious "health campaign."

.


TIME.com pg 1

TIME.com pg 2





[edit on 4-11-2009 by TrainDispatcher]



   copyright & usage 
Click here for more Swine Flu and other Diseases and Pandemics topics
Hot Topics   |   Top Topics   |   This Week   |   Subscribe   |   Home


reply posted on 4-11-2009 @ 11:33 PM by dunwichwitch











   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 5-11-2009 @ 01:19 AM by chiron613


Biological warfare has been used at least since the time of one of the plagues, when plague victims' bodies were catapulted into cities under siege. The idea was to spread plague in that city, which I think is what did happen.

To my understanding, it's a lot easier for a small country or a terrorist organization to get hold of biological weapons, than nuclear or chemical. They might not be able to get military-grade stuff, but plain old anthrax or plague would still be pretty bad.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 8-11-2009 @ 12:28 AM by dunwichwitch


Get dreaded ebola!!!!

Kill billions!!!!

Stop messing with us, amateurs!!!



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.















































ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.002 seconds
Page processed in 0.057 seconds
6 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.