reply to post by Ridhya
I did not insinuate that it could not be scientifically explained, only that you were wrong in that it is only scientific.
If it is purely scientific then could you please explain to me how it is that I have affected others with it, have benefited from a continual practice
of using it and there are results that are not scientifically explainable.
I apologize for attacking you as I did. Nothing personal I am just fed up with people taking position on subjects that they obviously have no
experience in and touting their belief as gospel.
If you had the opportunity to experience a small fraction of what I have and had seen the results for yourself, you just might believe as I do, that
science has not scratched the surface in regards to where life and consciousness begins and ends and therefore have no right to deny the experiences
of others because it does not fit in to the theory.
Science says the psychological effect and sensation is a result of mental stimulation. I contend that it is merely a measurable result of spiritual
activity and at that is just the beginning of a path that science can not even determine how to study, and therefore write it of since it does not
fit.
So you have studies and an education that tell you its physical, I have a life that says its not. I don’t care how science refutes it, you wont
convince me its not real and effective.


