Sirnex: “Point taken, so why no worldwide destruction mythologies? Why no mythologies depicting mountains forming that quickly?”
More appropriately, if you *actually* compare them you'd notice that none even agree with each other. They aren't the same story in the slightest.
You can't just claim that because a people that live near water at various times and experience a flood and turn it into a myth that this must mean
that they all remember some long ago cataclysm.
****The flood stories are about that destruction. They also have in common great conflagrations, falling rocks, mud, gravel and water. The evidence
for sudden elevation is in the mountains themselves. If they were formed slowly they would not have high jagged peaks. Why don’t we see it
happening today? If there was a cosmic catastrophe you likely would.
Their flood myths all speak of destruction, not just rising water.
They did tell the story; you have not reviewed the evidence.
You have not reviewed the Expanding Earth site. Therefore you answer is dishonest.
Essan, I have the book “Cataclysm” by Allan and DeLair They also site these Alaskan finds which were not mentioned in the intro that I sited for
that book, so I went elsewhere for it. Fact is the bones and vegetation were found. Such collections of diverse animal bones are found all over the
world and are all dated to the same time.
Also not mentioned are the Elongated Lakes as evidence of the Cosmic catastrophe.
All oriented NW/SE with the skinny end to the NW. like something came from that direction a gouged the trench. The suggestion is that Earth was hit
with a great hail of cosmic debris
Alaska
lakes
North Carolina also has thousands of lakes, tho not as long, they are likewise oriented in the same direction as the ones in Alaska.
Carolina
lakes