reply to post by Harte
I know, but it's fun replying to them and seeing what amount of stupidity will be crap spouted next. Although I admit sometimes it is very trying and
annoying to have to deal with the stupidity.
Proof! Of previous Civilizations and Cataclysms!, page 6
privacy
reply posted on 10-11-2009 @ 02:20 PM by Anamnesis
Originally posted by Knowledgeseeker5434
reply to post by sirnex
I keep reading his posts and laugh everytime. He keeps stating geology like its a proven science. Science has come to be wrong and it will stilll be wrong untill we know everything. I meen comeon people, they think the sphinx was built with the egyptians. Yet there are clearly water erosion marks on the base of it. And whens the last time water was that plentiful in it? 10,000 or so years. Many scientists has come forward with this, yet they throw the idea out because it goes against their standard beliefs of history. Answer me this. It took us how long to achieve our current state from our known history. 5,000 years? 6,000? And yet modern homo sapiens have been around for 125,000-150,000 years. If we could advance so quickly in 5,000 what the hell were we doing the other 140,000 years. Common sence tells me somthing most have been happening, oceans shift and sea levels rise and fall. The fact the nearly every culture has a flood myth, most having told of a great people destroyed by the flood and its survivors seeding knowlege across the world. Even the cultures of modren day africa have flood myths, yet clearly to you every flood myth revolves around people who live by the sea
You're funny. First you denigrate someone for believing that Geology is a proven science and then you turn around and cite "evidence" of weathering to "prove" that the Sphinx was not built by the Egyptians. So are you enjoying your cake?
Listen up knuckle heads. Geology IS proven science. I work in the Oil and Gas industry and we use knowledge based upon Geological science everyday in our pursuit of fossil fuels. Expanding earth theory is pure BS. Get it through your heads... it's BS!
Funny thing is that I agree with your contention that previous advanced civilizations existed that we have no knowledge of, but the Google Earth images of a few lines on the Ocean floor are certainly not proof.
I guess that here on ATS, "little boy" logic is acceptable and encouraged.
Rock On...
reply posted on 10-11-2009 @ 02:26 PM by Knowledgeseeker5434
reply to post by sirnex
I admire you for questioning alot, one thing I like about you. Though about our recent technology advance can be atributed to the fact that throughout our history religion has condemed science and such as blackmagic. Is it a coincidence that as soon as religion and government seperated that we advanced so much in only 200 years. I am not a firm believer in aliens, I think we as a people have a potential to advance very quickly. BUt due to the dark ages and such we have progressed very little in the 5,000 years up to the current 200. Im not saying atlantis is real or even if it was in the ocean. But can you tell me that since we advance so fast, what were people doing the other 125,000 years modern man has been around? Wouldnt it make more sence that mankind was once like we are today? Maby not but was destroyed due to some catacylsm, instead of hunting and gathering for 120,000 years living as animals?
I admire you for questioning alot, one thing I like about you. Though about our recent technology advance can be atributed to the fact that throughout our history religion has condemed science and such as blackmagic. Is it a coincidence that as soon as religion and government seperated that we advanced so much in only 200 years. I am not a firm believer in aliens, I think we as a people have a potential to advance very quickly. BUt due to the dark ages and such we have progressed very little in the 5,000 years up to the current 200. Im not saying atlantis is real or even if it was in the ocean. But can you tell me that since we advance so fast, what were people doing the other 125,000 years modern man has been around? Wouldnt it make more sence that mankind was once like we are today? Maby not but was destroyed due to some catacylsm, instead of hunting and gathering for 120,000 years living as animals?
reply posted on 10-11-2009 @ 02:28 PM by Knowledgeseeker5434
reply to post by Anamnesis
I agree with you the the hollowearth/expanding earth theory is bs. Maby the lines were caused by sand. All im saying is perhaps there was an advanced human culture befor our recorded history that was wiped out.
I agree with you the the hollowearth/expanding earth theory is bs. Maby the lines were caused by sand. All im saying is perhaps there was an advanced human culture befor our recorded history that was wiped out.
reply posted on 10-11-2009 @ 02:36 PM by apacheman
reply to post by PaulKCA
When you consider things like the Antikythera device; various anomalies like traces of tobacco and cocaine in Egyptian mummies, electrical devices in Babylon; the recently discovered trans-Amazonian civilization and the African stone metropolis, I've learned to keep an open mind about things of this nature, and not reject an idea out of hand just because it's outlandish.
Rather, I try to see if perhaps there isn't some bit of verifiable truth hidden somewhere in it to add to other bits of verified truth to help create a better picture of the past. The one thing I am absolutely sure of is that we don't know a whole lot for sure about most of our history, what we know for sure keeps changing, and the planet has a strong record of planetary disasters. I see the debate about the comet impact that may have been responsible for the disappearance of the megafauna and the Clovis people in North America and few things seem far-fetched if that is true, as seems to be the case.
www.theatlantic.com...
When you consider things like the Antikythera device; various anomalies like traces of tobacco and cocaine in Egyptian mummies, electrical devices in Babylon; the recently discovered trans-Amazonian civilization and the African stone metropolis, I've learned to keep an open mind about things of this nature, and not reject an idea out of hand just because it's outlandish.
Rather, I try to see if perhaps there isn't some bit of verifiable truth hidden somewhere in it to add to other bits of verified truth to help create a better picture of the past. The one thing I am absolutely sure of is that we don't know a whole lot for sure about most of our history, what we know for sure keeps changing, and the planet has a strong record of planetary disasters. I see the debate about the comet impact that may have been responsible for the disappearance of the megafauna and the Clovis people in North America and few things seem far-fetched if that is true, as seems to be the case.
www.theatlantic.com...
reply posted on 10-11-2009 @ 02:38 PM by sirnex
reply to post by Knowledgeseeker5434
Half truth. Only through the dark ages did this occur and only with the monotheistic church during that time. Prior to the dark ages the Muslims were an immense help in attaining scientific knowledge and progress. It was the churches wish to deny scientific progression as they viewed science as a means to question the churches power. Again, this was only during the dark ages, not prior to that. You would be surprised how long before the dark ages that we knew the Earth was round and circled the sun, only to be rediscovered centuries later, no thanks to the church.
If your talking about America then I have to disagree. America is not the only nation on the forefront of scientific progression. Many of our modern day advances are attributed to people from other nations.
The dark ages thankfully did not last that long. This time period is during the medieval christian/catholic churches reign of power.
The reason we've advanced so fast today is because of accumulated knowledge. In my opinion.
I don't think that would make much sense as it demands that somehow our ancestors had the same or close to the amount of knowledge we posses today. You don't just one day think gee I'll make a computer and bam you got one.
I admire you for questioning alot, one thing I like about you. Though about our recent technology advance can be atributed to the fact that throughout our history religion has condemed science and such as blackmagic.
Half truth. Only through the dark ages did this occur and only with the monotheistic church during that time. Prior to the dark ages the Muslims were an immense help in attaining scientific knowledge and progress. It was the churches wish to deny scientific progression as they viewed science as a means to question the churches power. Again, this was only during the dark ages, not prior to that. You would be surprised how long before the dark ages that we knew the Earth was round and circled the sun, only to be rediscovered centuries later, no thanks to the church.
Is it a coincidence that as soon as religion and government seperated that we advanced so much in only 200 years.
If your talking about America then I have to disagree. America is not the only nation on the forefront of scientific progression. Many of our modern day advances are attributed to people from other nations.
I am not a firm believer in aliens, I think we as a people have a potential to advance very quickly. BUt due to the dark ages and such we have progressed very little in the 5,000 years up to the current 200.
The dark ages thankfully did not last that long. This time period is during the medieval christian/catholic churches reign of power.
Im not saying atlantis is real or even if it was in the ocean. But can you tell me that since we advance so fast, what were people doing the other 125,000 years modern man has been around?
The reason we've advanced so fast today is because of accumulated knowledge. In my opinion.
Wouldnt it make more sence that mankind was once like we are today? Maby not but was destroyed due to some catacylsm, instead of hunting and gathering for 120,000 years living as animals?
I don't think that would make much sense as it demands that somehow our ancestors had the same or close to the amount of knowledge we posses today. You don't just one day think gee I'll make a computer and bam you got one.
reply posted on 10-11-2009 @ 02:42 PM by OhZone
sirnex
“And yet so forgettable. Why are there no myths or creation stories about this? At least none that I am aware of. Did all the scientists and teachers die during the cataclysm, perhaps all the adults died leaving only the children who would then be unable to restart civilization. Where is the proof for this worldwide cataclysm? Are scientists lying about the various ages for geological features around the world? For what end and purpose would every single scientist, archeologist and geologist have for lying to us?”
****Why should this give rise to Creation Stories? Everything was already created. It just got mess up.
sirnex
“If your talking about flood myths, all of these myths are not from the same period of time nor do they depict the same story and if that isn't enough of a clincher, myth floods only exist for those who live around bodies of water. Your assertion that all myths include some type of cataclysm is bogus bunk and an outright lie unless your not actually aware that other mythologies exist without cataclysms. In which case, as seemingly evident so far, get an education.”
****If you compared them you would see that they are from the same time period. It is the later retelling of them that has people confused. Time lines of History are unreliable. Once upon a time there were no calendars.
Sirnex: “I'm still going to have to disagree here. You've failed to show how these civilizations exist under thousands of feet of ocean water and surviving immense pressures that even our most advance subs can't even stand.”
****No one is saying that there are civilizations existing down there. Like elsewhere, there are just the markings of the Ruins.
Sirnex:
“I'm not questioning current habitation, I'm questioning habitation period. Current geology places these areas underwater for millions of years“
****What makes you think that they were there for Millions of years?
.More likely they have been there about 11,500 years.
You didn’t read my links. You arguments are not serious.
Sirnex:
“Are you offering an alternative to the observed effects of how mountains form? If you are I would love to hear it along with any evidences besides look at these pretty looking lines under water they must be roads type arguments“
That's exactly my predicament, I have been where you folks are now and it is exactly through looking into these different claims that lead me against them. Nearly everything I used to believe, such as the thing's posted here in this thread, I later learned through verifying those claims that they were pure BS.”
****Who has observed mountains forming? Would you be surprized to learn that they were actually formed within hours?
And exactly how did you Verify you info? Curious minds want to know?
"This first part of When the Earth Nearly Died challenges contemporary theories by showing in a detailed survey that well-established geological, palaeontological and biological evidence point to this planet undergoing sudden and very major physical changes about 11,500 years ago. (In fact, the 'Ice Age', as proposed by orthodoxy, is abandoned by the authors in favour of a much shorter later period of intense cold). Nearly all the phenomena ascribed to conventional Ice Age theory can be interpreted as the result of natural convulsions of worldwide proportions. The authors - citing much reputable supporting evidence - argue that the great mountain ranges of today and the great crustal displacements which, along with enormous seismic and volcanic eruptions, changed the face of the Earth, in fact happened violently, rapidly and comparatively very recently."
"One of the most fascinating bodies of evidence is provided by animal remains found in caves, especially in Europe, Asia, South American and Australasia. These usually consist of chaotic agglutinated piles of disjointed bones of a variety of species that could never have co-existed in the same environment - tropical species in northern graveyards and northern species at many equatorial sites. Bird remains in Californian tar-pits illustrate this anomaly even more tellingly. We can only conclude that a vast cataclysm brought about such global carnage. "carnage
Such evidence is also Found in Alaska.
Frank Hibben goes to Alaska
"Instead he found miles of muck filled with the remains of mammoth, mastodon, several kinds of bison, horses, wolves, bears and lions. Just north of Fairbanks, Hibbens and his associates watched as bulldozers pushed the half-melted muck into sluice boxes for the extraction of gold.
Animal tusks and bones rolled up in front of the blades "like shavings before a giant plane". The carcasses were found in all attitudes of death, most of them "pulled apart by some unexplainable prehistoric catastrophic disturbance" (Hibben, 1946).
The evidence of the violence of nature combined with the stench of rotting carcasses was staggering. The ice fields containing these remains stretched for hundred of miles in every direction (Hibben, 1946). Trees and animals, layers of peat and mosses, twisted and mangled together like some giant mixer had jumbled them some 10,000 years ago, and then froze them into a solid mass."
Alaska bones
Sirnex, I would like to see your contrary evidence.
.
“And yet so forgettable. Why are there no myths or creation stories about this? At least none that I am aware of. Did all the scientists and teachers die during the cataclysm, perhaps all the adults died leaving only the children who would then be unable to restart civilization. Where is the proof for this worldwide cataclysm? Are scientists lying about the various ages for geological features around the world? For what end and purpose would every single scientist, archeologist and geologist have for lying to us?”
****Why should this give rise to Creation Stories? Everything was already created. It just got mess up.
sirnex
“If your talking about flood myths, all of these myths are not from the same period of time nor do they depict the same story and if that isn't enough of a clincher, myth floods only exist for those who live around bodies of water. Your assertion that all myths include some type of cataclysm is bogus bunk and an outright lie unless your not actually aware that other mythologies exist without cataclysms. In which case, as seemingly evident so far, get an education.”
****If you compared them you would see that they are from the same time period. It is the later retelling of them that has people confused. Time lines of History are unreliable. Once upon a time there were no calendars.
Sirnex: “I'm still going to have to disagree here. You've failed to show how these civilizations exist under thousands of feet of ocean water and surviving immense pressures that even our most advance subs can't even stand.”
****No one is saying that there are civilizations existing down there. Like elsewhere, there are just the markings of the Ruins.
Sirnex:
“I'm not questioning current habitation, I'm questioning habitation period. Current geology places these areas underwater for millions of years“
****What makes you think that they were there for Millions of years?
.More likely they have been there about 11,500 years.
You didn’t read my links. You arguments are not serious.
Sirnex:
“Are you offering an alternative to the observed effects of how mountains form? If you are I would love to hear it along with any evidences besides look at these pretty looking lines under water they must be roads type arguments“
That's exactly my predicament, I have been where you folks are now and it is exactly through looking into these different claims that lead me against them. Nearly everything I used to believe, such as the thing's posted here in this thread, I later learned through verifying those claims that they were pure BS.”
****Who has observed mountains forming? Would you be surprized to learn that they were actually formed within hours?
And exactly how did you Verify you info? Curious minds want to know?
"This first part of When the Earth Nearly Died challenges contemporary theories by showing in a detailed survey that well-established geological, palaeontological and biological evidence point to this planet undergoing sudden and very major physical changes about 11,500 years ago. (In fact, the 'Ice Age', as proposed by orthodoxy, is abandoned by the authors in favour of a much shorter later period of intense cold). Nearly all the phenomena ascribed to conventional Ice Age theory can be interpreted as the result of natural convulsions of worldwide proportions. The authors - citing much reputable supporting evidence - argue that the great mountain ranges of today and the great crustal displacements which, along with enormous seismic and volcanic eruptions, changed the face of the Earth, in fact happened violently, rapidly and comparatively very recently."
"One of the most fascinating bodies of evidence is provided by animal remains found in caves, especially in Europe, Asia, South American and Australasia. These usually consist of chaotic agglutinated piles of disjointed bones of a variety of species that could never have co-existed in the same environment - tropical species in northern graveyards and northern species at many equatorial sites. Bird remains in Californian tar-pits illustrate this anomaly even more tellingly. We can only conclude that a vast cataclysm brought about such global carnage. "carnage
Such evidence is also Found in Alaska.
Frank Hibben goes to Alaska
"Instead he found miles of muck filled with the remains of mammoth, mastodon, several kinds of bison, horses, wolves, bears and lions. Just north of Fairbanks, Hibbens and his associates watched as bulldozers pushed the half-melted muck into sluice boxes for the extraction of gold.
Animal tusks and bones rolled up in front of the blades "like shavings before a giant plane". The carcasses were found in all attitudes of death, most of them "pulled apart by some unexplainable prehistoric catastrophic disturbance" (Hibben, 1946).
The evidence of the violence of nature combined with the stench of rotting carcasses was staggering. The ice fields containing these remains stretched for hundred of miles in every direction (Hibben, 1946). Trees and animals, layers of peat and mosses, twisted and mangled together like some giant mixer had jumbled them some 10,000 years ago, and then froze them into a solid mass."
Alaska bones
Sirnex, I would like to see your contrary evidence.
.
reply posted on 10-11-2009 @ 02:57 PM by sirnex
reply to post by OhZone
Point taken, so why no worldwide destruction mythologies? Why no mythologies depicting mountains forming that quickly?
More appropriately, if you *actually* compare them you'd notice that none even agree with each other. They aren't the same story in the slightest. You can't just claim that because a people that live near water at various times and experience a flood and turn it into a myth that this must mean that they all remember some long ago cataclysm.
They don't look anything remotely similar to that at all to me.
Er, yea... the expanding Earth. Somehow I think not.
Mountain formation is a slow process, so of course I haven't observed it occurring. How come we don't see mountains forming today if it's such a quick process?
And somehow all life managed to survive and live to tell the story! Oh wait... they forgot to tell the story.
And I would like to see scientifically verified evidence of yours.
Why should this give rise to Creation Stories? Everything was already created. It just got mess up.
Point taken, so why no worldwide destruction mythologies? Why no mythologies depicting mountains forming that quickly?
If you compared them you would see that they are from the same time period. It is the later retelling of them that has people confused. Time lines of History are unreliable. Once upon a time there were no calendars.
More appropriately, if you *actually* compare them you'd notice that none even agree with each other. They aren't the same story in the slightest. You can't just claim that because a people that live near water at various times and experience a flood and turn it into a myth that this must mean that they all remember some long ago cataclysm.
No one is saying that there are civilizations existing down there. Like elsewhere, there are just the markings of the Ruins.
They don't look anything remotely similar to that at all to me.
What makes you think that they were there for Millions of years?
.More likely they have been there about 11,500 years.
You didn’t read my links. You arguments are not serious.
Er, yea... the expanding Earth. Somehow I think not.
Who has observed mountains forming? Would you be surprized to learn that they were actually formed within hours?
And exactly how did you Verify you info? Curious minds want to know?
Mountain formation is a slow process, so of course I haven't observed it occurring. How come we don't see mountains forming today if it's such a quick process?
Nearly all the phenomena ascribed to conventional Ice Age theory can be interpreted as the result of natural convulsions of worldwide proportions.
And somehow all life managed to survive and live to tell the story! Oh wait... they forgot to tell the story.
Sirnex, I would like to see your contrary evidence.
And I would like to see scientifically verified evidence of yours.
reply posted on 10-11-2009 @ 03:12 PM by Anamnesis
Originally posted by PaulKCA
reply to post by Anamnesis
More Intellect! Mirroring truth! Bliss!
Quipy little fella, aren't ya?
I have an idea, instead of offering your snide little remarks as a dismissal of all things "sheepish". Why not offer up some sound evidence that supports your theory? Then make a few predictions based upon that theory which can then be verified? Oh wait... that seems a little to "scientific" for your liking I bet.
In case you haven't noticed. Science has provided you w/many wonderful things so you can pursue anti-intellectualism from the comfort of your own home! While you sit there in your PJ's contemplating just how wrong and un-truthful science is, real people are out in the real world using "sheepish" science as a TOOL to give you all the comforts you can imagine!
The next time you get the idea that science is wrong, take a look around you brother. That PC or MAC you're using, Science! That TV you're watching while you hatch the latest conspiracy theory, Science! AND.... the Gas you put in your vehicle to drive down to the video game store... just how do you think that it was found? Right again, oh pinnacle of truthfulness, Geology makes it possible.
[snip]
Ill-mannered remark removed
[edit on 10/11/09 by masqua]
reply posted on 10-11-2009 @ 03:28 PM by Essan
reply to post by OhZone
Have you actually read Hibben's book? He has been much misquoted out context
Have you actually read Hibben's book? He has been much misquoted out context
reply posted on 10-11-2009 @ 03:38 PM by PaulKCA
reply to post by Anamnesis
Bliss Pure Bliss!
From your first post;
You're funny. First you denigrate someone for believing that Geology is a proven science and then you turn around and cite "evidence" of weathering to "prove" that the Sphinx was not built by the Egyptians. So are you enjoying your cake?
Listen up knuckle heads. Geology IS proven science. I work in the Oil and Gas industry and we use knowledge based upon Geological science everyday in our pursuit of fossil fuels. Expanding earth theory is pure BS. Get it through your heads... it's BS!
Funny thing is that I agree with your contention that previous advanced civilizations existed that we have no knowledge of, but the Google Earth images of a few lines on the Ocean floor are certainly not proof.
I guess that here on ATS, "little boy" logic is acceptable and encouraged.
You're here aren't you?
And this one;
Quipy little fella, aren't ya?
Not so little!
I have an idea, instead of offering your snide little remarks as a dismissal of all things "sheepish". Why not offer up some sound evidence that supports your theory? Then make a few predictions based upon that theory which can then be verified? Oh wait... that seems a little to "scientific" for your liking I bet.
Already have naive one! Why don't you offer us all data to the contrary?
In case you haven't noticed. Science has provided you w/many wonderful things so you can pursue anti-intellectualism from the comfort of your own home! While you sit there in your PJ's contemplating just how wrong and un-truthful science is, real people are out in the real world using "sheepish" science as a TOOL to give you all the comforts you can imagine!
Don't recall having mentioned anything about science, believe you are confusing me with some one else, "not surprised"!
The next time you get the idea that science is wrong, take a look around you brother. That PC or MAC you're using, Science! That TV you're watching while you hatch the latest conspiracy theory, Science! AND.... the Gas you put in your vehicle to drive down to the video game store... just how do you think that it was found? Right again, oh pinnacle of truthfulness, Geology makes it possible.
No TV since 2001! Been learning the truth about the world in which I live continually my whole life instead of accepting what others tell me to believe and digitally for the past decade and a half! To the exclusion of the need for acceptance!
Please... go push your little boy logic on someone with enough lack of sense to believe your garbage.
You first! Little One! Not pushing anything, take it for what it is or preferably Leave it! No one has solicited your input here!
[edit on 10-11-2009 by PaulKCA]
[edit on 10-11-2009 by PaulKCA]
[edit on 10-11-2009 by PaulKCA]
Bliss Pure Bliss!
From your first post;
You're funny. First you denigrate someone for believing that Geology is a proven science and then you turn around and cite "evidence" of weathering to "prove" that the Sphinx was not built by the Egyptians. So are you enjoying your cake?
Listen up knuckle heads. Geology IS proven science. I work in the Oil and Gas industry and we use knowledge based upon Geological science everyday in our pursuit of fossil fuels. Expanding earth theory is pure BS. Get it through your heads... it's BS!
Funny thing is that I agree with your contention that previous advanced civilizations existed that we have no knowledge of, but the Google Earth images of a few lines on the Ocean floor are certainly not proof.
I guess that here on ATS, "little boy" logic is acceptable and encouraged.
You're here aren't you?
And this one;
Quipy little fella, aren't ya?
Not so little!
I have an idea, instead of offering your snide little remarks as a dismissal of all things "sheepish". Why not offer up some sound evidence that supports your theory? Then make a few predictions based upon that theory which can then be verified? Oh wait... that seems a little to "scientific" for your liking I bet.
Already have naive one! Why don't you offer us all data to the contrary?
In case you haven't noticed. Science has provided you w/many wonderful things so you can pursue anti-intellectualism from the comfort of your own home! While you sit there in your PJ's contemplating just how wrong and un-truthful science is, real people are out in the real world using "sheepish" science as a TOOL to give you all the comforts you can imagine!
Don't recall having mentioned anything about science, believe you are confusing me with some one else, "not surprised"!
The next time you get the idea that science is wrong, take a look around you brother. That PC or MAC you're using, Science! That TV you're watching while you hatch the latest conspiracy theory, Science! AND.... the Gas you put in your vehicle to drive down to the video game store... just how do you think that it was found? Right again, oh pinnacle of truthfulness, Geology makes it possible.
No TV since 2001! Been learning the truth about the world in which I live continually my whole life instead of accepting what others tell me to believe and digitally for the past decade and a half! To the exclusion of the need for acceptance!
Please... go push your little boy logic on someone with enough lack of sense to believe your garbage.
You first! Little One! Not pushing anything, take it for what it is or preferably Leave it! No one has solicited your input here!
[edit on 10-11-2009 by PaulKCA]
[edit on 10-11-2009 by PaulKCA]
[edit on 10-11-2009 by PaulKCA]
Ancient Walled City, Older than Egypt\'s Pyramids, Unearthed off US Georgia Coast
Posted 14 days ago with 102 member flags
Posted 14 days ago with 102 member flags
42,000-year-old paintings : \'The oldest work of art ever\' discovered
Posted 5 days ago with 26 member flags
Posted 5 days ago with 26 member flags
Newest topics, updated in real-time:
Europe to USA : Give more money to IMF so we can bailout Greece
Global Meltdown, Posted 3 minutes ago
Global Meltdown, Posted 3 minutes ago
Afghanistan Base 'Aryan' Raises Objections From Soldiers Over Name
Breaking Alternative News, Posted 4 minutes ago
Breaking Alternative News, Posted 4 minutes ago
Judge Napolitano says FreedomWatch cancellation was NOT because of message & stop sending emails
US Political Madness, Posted 27 minutes ago
US Political Madness, Posted 27 minutes ago
Justice Breyer robbed by machete-wielding intruder at West Indies vacation home
Other Current Events, Posted 39 minutes ago
Other Current Events, Posted 39 minutes ago
If race doesn't exist why are there policies to fight Racism?
Social Issues and Civil Unrest, Posted 44 minutes ago
Social Issues and Civil Unrest, Posted 44 minutes ago
Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:
I'm 24 and I feel Doomed- A rare Case - 28 reported Worldwide
Medical Issues & Conspiracies, Posted 16 hours ago, 31 flags
Medical Issues & Conspiracies, Posted 16 hours ago, 31 flags
Newest 9/11 Documentary - Proof 9/11 was an inside Job
9/11 Conspiracies, Posted 7 hours ago, 19 flags
9/11 Conspiracies, Posted 7 hours ago, 19 flags
Israeli diplomat's car in India hit by blast
Breaking Alternative News, Posted 12 hours ago, 17 flags
Breaking Alternative News, Posted 12 hours ago, 17 flags
Frozen continent! Europe's rivers, lakes and even seas are iced over
Fragile Earth, Posted 14 hours ago, 16 flags
Fragile Earth, Posted 14 hours ago, 16 flags
What have you become America? "America's homeless resort to tent cities"
Social Issues and Civil Unrest, Posted 6 hours ago, 13 flags
Social Issues and Civil Unrest, Posted 6 hours ago, 13 flags
The Pirate Bay Says Goodbye to (Most) Torrents on February 29
Breaking Alternative News, Posted 9 hours ago, 12 flags
Breaking Alternative News, Posted 9 hours ago, 12 flags
Israel Blames Iran Of Bombings In India, Georgia
Breaking Alternative News, Posted 10 hours ago, 11 flags
Breaking Alternative News, Posted 10 hours ago, 11 flags
Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:
The Secret of Freemasonry Seen in the Reflection of a Mirror - What do you see?
Secret Societies, Posted 8 hours ago, 131 replies
Secret Societies, Posted 8 hours ago, 131 replies
Israel Blames Iran Of Bombings In India, Georgia
Breaking Alternative News, Posted 10 hours ago, 82 replies
Breaking Alternative News, Posted 10 hours ago, 82 replies
Bin Laden told children 'live in peace in the West'
Other Current Events, Posted 8 hours ago, 73 replies
Other Current Events, Posted 8 hours ago, 73 replies
Israeli diplomat's car in India hit by blast
Breaking Alternative News, Posted 12 hours ago, 52 replies
Breaking Alternative News, Posted 12 hours ago, 52 replies
I'm 24 and I feel Doomed- A rare Case - 28 reported Worldwide
Medical Issues & Conspiracies, Posted 16 hours ago, 52 replies
Medical Issues & Conspiracies, Posted 16 hours ago, 52 replies
What have you become America? "America's homeless resort to tent cities"
Social Issues and Civil Unrest, Posted 6 hours ago, 48 replies
Social Issues and Civil Unrest, Posted 6 hours ago, 48 replies
Newest 9/11 Documentary - Proof 9/11 was an inside Job
9/11 Conspiracies, Posted 7 hours ago, 45 replies
9/11 Conspiracies, Posted 7 hours ago, 45 replies
The Above Top Secret Web sites are a
wholly owned social content community of
The Above Network, LLC.
This content community relies on
user-generated content from our member contributors.
The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership
who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides
a collaborative venue for free expression.
ATS Server: www2.theabovenetwork.com
Header data: 0.003 seconds
Page processed in: 0.501 seconds
wholly owned social content community of
The Above Network, LLC.
This content community relies on
user-generated content from our member contributors.
The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership
who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides
a collaborative venue for free expression.
ATS Server: www2.theabovenetwork.com
Header data: 0.003 seconds
Page processed in: 0.501 seconds
