reply to post by jacksmoke
Now Jack, your reply was understandable, given the brief comment I made there.
On many other threads, I'm fairly consistent. Get in, kill as many as you have to - as fast as you can - to win - and then let's get the boys
home.
Anything less is an abomination. Anything less prolongs the suffering of soldiers AND civilians.
Anything less costs unnecessary blood on both sides. Anything less prolongs the misery of the country.
Two men knew how to win in Afghanistan, and did. They were the only two to defeat the Afghanis. It took three years of all-out effort.
We've improved transport, so it shouldn't take more than two if we get serious now. And then we're done with it.
Tell Karzai to take care business in his corrupt administration, and we'll take care of business in the field.
One, big, free-fire zone.
Easy to spot. Those that run are enemy. Those that don't run are just well-disciplined enemy.
Guerrillas have to have mobility, ingress and egress, resupply, and water.
It's not about fighting.
It's about HUNTING. The prey always falls to a determined, skillful hunter.