Secret copyright treaty leaks. It's bad. Very bad., page 6


Pages: <<  3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 71 times


reply posted on 9-11-2009 @ 03:59 AM by space cadet
reply to post by budski



As I sit here using the internet to fill my mind and extra time at work, I have to say that no more internet sounds good to me. Throw in the cell phones and I will be jumping for joy! This world does not have to have either, it was not so long ago that, believe it or not, there WAS NO INTERNET! And life ran along just fine. Same with the cells. Just think of all the jobs that it would re-create if folks had to go back to couriers, and paper products! We can recycle, it does not mean all the trees need to be chopped down! And no more unseen waves would be passing through our bodies 24-7, oh, a girl can dream!


reply posted on 9-11-2009 @ 11:57 AM by mgmirkin
* That ISPs have to proactively police copyright on user-contributed material. This means that it will be impossible to run a service like Flickr or YouTube or Blogger, since hiring enough lawyers to ensure that the mountain of material uploaded every second isn’t infringing will exceed any hope of profitability.


Do they not even know the difference between an ISP and a web site?

Flickr, YouTube and Blogger are not ISPs... The article's comment above is therefore nonsensical...

Pretty much all court rulings have set the precedent that a community website is NOT responsible for the posts of its end users. They're responsible for their own content.

If ISPs are to be responsible for "active" policing, then certainly ISPs will have a tough time of it. But Flickr, YouTube and such are NOT ISPs.

That said, copyright law seems to get progressively worse and worse over the years and remove more of our rights to view and use materials we've purchased AS WE SEE FIT. Fair use has gone down the drain.

Once I've purchased a CD or a DVD, I should be able to copy it or use it however the bloody hell I want for my own personal private use. Obviously that does not confer on me the right to make it available for others who have not paid their dues to be able to view it. But, I should bloody well be able to copy it to my computer, or an iPod, or make a backup copy so the primary doesn't get scratched / fingerprinted, etc. That such is apparently "not allowed" is a bit ridiculous. Ya' buy a toaster, the toaster company doesn't get to come into your home and tell you how to use your toaster. You can disassemble it, reassemble it, turn it into modern art. But God forbid you buy a CD or DVD and use it other than the way it's intended by the fascist MPAA / RIAA to be used. Ridiculous.

Pages: <<  3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



Israel angered over IAEA vote on nuclear arsenal
  Posted 13 days ago with 79 member flags
Neil Armstrong dead at age 82 - report
  Posted 17 days ago with 63 member flags
Judge orders release of detained Marine veteran
  Posted 19 days ago with 58 member flags
Birds hold \'funerals\' for dead
  Posted 10 days ago with 55 member flags
TSA agents swarm Ron Paul\'s plane, demand explosives check
  Posted 11 days ago with 47 member flags
Mysterious Changes in Ocean Salt Spur NASA Expedition
  Posted 1 days ago with 36 member flags
Ga. Murder Case Uncovers Terror Plot by Soldiers
  Posted 15 days ago with 32 member flags