ATS News 05: China Developing Anti-Gravity Technology for Stealthy Missles

reply to post by AboveTopSecret.com

---

I guess Gary Mckinnon was either correct or partialy correct when he stated that the phenomena of anti-gravity would trickle down through government contractors. It is all too bad that science has far exceeded a science of mind. What do we(The abductees and experimentees) get for all of our troubles? A high ranking posistion or what? As an experimentee I will not be denied my high ranking posistion of Terrestrial Officer and thus I stake my claim. "There exists therefore for the individual an I-Time or subjective time this in its self is not measurable." A.E. 1879-1955 "This is a work of transmission to all of those in the channel." Rudy Rucker Infinity and the Mind

---

---

reply to post by AboveTopSecret.com

---

Their agenda is a 1-2-3 punch! A SLOW GRIND KNOCK-OUT!

1. Your wallet... Simply, hit em hard by putting the population in the poor house and bail out the culprits.

2. Your Health... Create a pandemic for drug company profits, then flood the globe with conflicting versions of a growing swine flu Boogey Monster.

3. Your Saftey... Ramp up all living or dead "Boogey Monsters", create conflicts to install millitary bases around the world, jail or kill anyone WHO is not on their hand picked winning team.

Now I ask the question: "Where is Jesus when we need him?"



[edit on 6-11-2009 by Level X]

reply to post by Springer

---

Okay Springer. Then I think there is one thing missing from these broadcasts. You should have Johnny A where a tin foil hat during the broadcasts. After all, you don't want to come off as stuffy and gloomy and doomy. I think a tin foil hat on Johnny is the perfect solution.





[edit on 8-11-2009 by Excitable_Boy]

reply to post by Excitable_Boy

---

Tell you what, you go do a completely serious news cast and we'll see which is better and gets more traction. We'll see which one opens more eyes and attracts more people to the topics.

How's that?

Springer...

reply to post by Springer

---

It amazes me how difficult a time you have with constructive criticism. I will admit my last post was quite tongue in cheek but prior to that I was truly trying to give good contructive ciriticsm. You only like to hear the people that are telling you how awesome the show is and how great this is and how wonderful Johnny is and blah blah blah.

I was truly trying to help. How do you learn and grow if all you are willing to listen to is positive feedback? Everyone on here that has not said good things and not kissed your butt and the butt of the whole site has gotten knocked down or had their posts removed.

Why even have a thread to discuss each show if all you want to hear is positive feedback? Seriously...

[edit on 8-11-2009 by Excitable_Boy]

reply to post by Excitable_Boy

---

That is completely untrue. I don't know where you grew up but calling people names and making rude remarks about their appearance/physical gestures is not "constructive criticism", it's childish bashing, usually out of envy or malice.

After I removed your insulting, snide post you moved on to "everything must be serious", I responded as to why that's not so and you went on to inform me that I was comparing apples and oranges. OK, We agree to disagree...

You kept on, so I suggested you go do a news a show and make it as serious as you think it should be and we'll see who attracts more people.

Nothing has been removed from this thread but vile insults and childish innuendo/mockery.

Springer...

Is it just me or does Johnny Anonymous remind anyone of Max Headroom?

Just sayin.