reply to post by Janky Red
But in spirit you are using this SANCTION as a wedge, another benchmark which only
redefines the goal.
But in process, your stance is only used to prevent the goal of gay marriage, because the government sanction of marriage would need to be
eliminated.
which would not be supported by people.
The new line in the sand would be "THE GOVERNMENT IS TRYING TO END THE INSTITUTION OF MARRIAGE".
"the humanity!!!!"
YOU damn well know people would not SANCTION THAT... I understand the way it works as do you... You are setting a new goal which would only perpetuate
the same practical outcome.
You are spinning rather wildly
You are hilarious!
Everything in your world hates you doesn't it?
While I feel complimented that you think that my goals and motives are so deviously clandestine and draconian, you couldn't be farther from the truth
if you were paid to do so.
You are not Fighting for the right to love, you are fighting for the privileged of a government approved relationship, with benefits.
You are not fighting for "Rights", you are fighting for the government to be in control of your relationship.
You are not fighting for equality... you are fighting for institutionalized slavery.
It is not the government's right to dictate these things.
It is not the governments right to approve or disapprove of these things.
The government has no legal SAY in our personal lives, because it is BEYOND THEIR JURISDICTION!
I'll say it again.... IT IS BEYOND THEIR JURISDICTION
What you are really arguing FOR, is the governments RIGHT to dictate what happens to your collective assets once you "Break" your relationship
contract.
You apparently have no idea what government is FOR.
-Edrick
