It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
The IAEA director-general warned other countries not to "jump the gun" or be swayed by politics, urging them to allow the IAEA to conduct its inspections thoroughly and properly.
Apparently referring to intelligence mistakes made in pre-war Iraq, ElBaradei said, "We need to assess the veracity of intelligence information."
He added: "Force should never be used unless every other option has been exhausted, and only then within the bounds of international law ... All of these lessons are applica
Yes they can fend just like Iraq did. Who won the Iraq vs Iran war? It took us like 2 weeks to be done with the "war" part of the Iraq war.
Originally posted by disfugured
reply to post by whoshotJR
Yes they can fend just like Iraq did. Who won the Iraq vs Iran war? It took us like 2 weeks to be done with the "war" part of the Iraq war.
If you call that a victory. All that did was awaken more of the sleeping sheep in the world.
WOMD = X
Al-Qaeda = X
Why is America there = $$$
Originally posted by whoshotJR
reply to post by MegaCurious
Yes they can fend just like Iraq did. Who won the Iraq vs Iran war? It took us like 2 weeks to be done with the "war" part of the Iraq war.
Iran really stands very little chance if the US and Israel decide they want war.
Originally posted by dooper
The only folks who would really have a problem with Iran's facilities getting hit are the Iranians, the Syrians, and of course the turdknockers at the UN.
It will be quick and over with.
No invading forces, point attacks, and we won't have to worry about getting caught up in a civil war as happened in Iraq.
Originally posted by dooper
The only folks who would really have a problem with Iran's facilities getting hit are the Iranians, the Syrians, and of course the turdknockers at the UN.
It will be quick and over with.
No invading forces, point attacks, and we won't have to worry about getting caught up in a civil war as happened in Iraq.
Conclusion
Mistrust between the United States and Iran’s Islamic regime has run deep for almost three decades, and many argue that it is unlikely to be quickly overcome, even if the Obama Administration initiates—and Iran accepts—comprehensive direct talks with Iran. As noted, that possibility might have been made more remote by the violent dispute over the June 12 presidential election in Iran. Despite the internal power struggle, many experts say that all factions in Iran are united on major national security issues and that U.S.-Iran relations might not improve unless or until the Islamic regime is removed or moderates substantially, even if a nuclear deal is reached and implemented.
Others say that, despite Ahmadinejad’s presidency, the United States and Iran have a common long-term interest in stability in the Persian Gulf and South Asia regions in the aftermath of the defeat of the Taliban and the regime of Saddam Hussein and that major diplomatic overtures might now yield fruit.
Link
[edit on 2-11-2009 by tristar]
I support the U.N. but I'm not a turdknocker