Rush Limbaugh- Fox News Sunday-Sarah Palin Ready!, page 5
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 4 times


reply posted on 2-11-2009 @ 07:29 PM by Snarf
Originally posted by vor78
reply to
post by whaaa



I would call them true American patriots. Not because the support Palin specifically, but because they see that there's something very wrong with this country and because they have the strength to maintain their conviction that their favored candidate can help right the ship, whether she actually can or not.


Just because someone maintains their convictions in the face of adversity doesn't mean that they can be trusted or admired...or even supported.

In all the face of their own adversity...local Klan members maintain their hatred of black people.

So if you're going to support someone for holding their convictions, why not your friendly neighborhood Grand Imperial Wizard


reply posted on 2-11-2009 @ 07:32 PM by vor78
reply to post by Snarf



Yeah, well, you can pull an extreme example out of your backside that invalidates it, I suppose. I'm more interested in dealing with this particular case.


reply posted on 2-11-2009 @ 07:34 PM by whaaa
Originally posted by vor78
reply to
post by whaaa



I would call them true American patriots. Not because the support Palin specifically, but because they see that there's something very wrong with this country and because they have the strength to maintain their conviction that their favored candidate can help right the ship, whether she actually can or not.


Do you think that the people that see something wrong with this country and have the conviction to help see us thru hard times but DON'T support Palin are American patriots too.

Or are we as the right wing likes to describe us as "you people" the devisive term so favored by the devotees of Rush, Savage and Sean.
Like somehow that we who have a different approach to the problems are branded socialist, communists, America haters etc.

[edit on 2-11-2009 by whaaa]



reply posted on 2-11-2009 @ 08:11 PM by vor78
reply to post by whaaa



Yeah, she's a Pentecostal. Its not my thing, either, but I know plenty that practice very similar beliefs. Their Christian beliefs are quite a bit different from my own, but on the whole, I've generally found them completely harmless.

That's not to say that your concerns are unfounded or anything, but that speaking for myself, it doesn't bother me and I do not see a connection between her views and those of Hagee (and if that's not an misrepresentation of *his* views, well, that is some ****ed up ****). Everyone has bizarre beliefs if you get right down to it.


[edit on 2-11-2009 by vor78]


reply posted on 2-11-2009 @ 08:31 PM by mrpotatohead
reply to post by OldDragger



The change that Obama promised has tuned out to be not exactly what millions of moderates who put him in office had hoped for. I don't think most Americans who supported Obama had in mind the total Fascist takeover of our lives. We are getting a change, but it's about to change again.

I feel both parties have screwed Americans, as they both live off the fat of the American worker, and the sooner everyone figures out that neither party is better than the other, the better all will be.

That's the change I can believe in. I don't care what color Obama is, I don't care if he was born in the USA, none of this matters. The only thing that matters is getting an entire group of new people in office. people who will follow the constitution, and do what's right for America, instead of following lock step to the party line. it will take a real change, not to this fascist state we have become, but back to our real beginnings.

People who are quick to dismiss Sarah Palin as a country bumkin don't get "it", and never will. They think Obama is so smart, and he is, just too smart for his own good. If Sarah palin were not here and now, there would be another one like Palin, to take her place. That is the essence of the new movement in politics that is happening now. A large portion of the voting masses are tired of business as usual, and want real change. neither party is giving that right now. But, Sarah palin does give a voice to a real change. Like her or not, she will be an influence in the coming elections.

The more the Obama kool-aid drinking press try to character asassinate her, the stronger she gets, and the mader that groups of women voters who support her get.

Try as they will, Obama supporters dismiss her as a complete political sophomore, who has no understanding of world issues. But, I ask you this, with the so called best and brightest team of genuises scripting his every move, and all his statements written out for him on a teleprompter, why are we in the mess we are in? He can't blame Bush #2 forever. I think I'd rather give somebody with some real common sense a crack at leadership, rather than a bunch of Ivy league no-it alls, who are expert at Chicago style politics, but don't know a thing about running a country. So dimiss Palin all you want, but you're only just getting started to see her. There IS, more to come.



reply posted on 2-11-2009 @ 09:06 PM by Teslaforce
Facism? Bush #2's Patriot Act & first Banker Bailout.

www.newsmax.com...

Clinton's dissolution of the Glass–Steagall Act and implementation of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA - North American Union).

Bush#1 "What is at stake is more than one small country, it is a big idea - a new world order...to achieve the universal aspirations of mankind...based on shared principles and the rule of law...the illumination of a thousand points of light...The winds of change are with us now."

Obama is just following along with the program. If we're gonna vote our way out of this, we'd better make it count.

As far as Limbaugh is concerned, I'd rather listen to my own *ss; at least if it sh*ts me, I know it's my own.

en.wikipedia.org...


reply posted on 2-11-2009 @ 09:53 PM by Eurisko2012
reply to post by vor78



They DO fear Sarah Palin.
The fear will begin to snowball when the liberals get
swept by the republicans tomorrow.
The next snowball is already on the way. - November 2010 -
We take back the House and the Senate.


reply posted on 2-11-2009 @ 10:14 PM by ZombieOctopus
Originally posted by vor78
reply to
post by ZombieOctopus



That's probably the most compelling argument I've read so far. Afterall, if the people of Canada are in a position to laugh at our expense, we must really be in bad shape.


Exactly. Have you seen our politics? Borrrrrring! American politics is like 24/7 comedy, especially how you guys get so riled up about the most trivial things.

Personally I can't wait to see Palin's campaign, it's like watching a child at a talent show for special children and all the parents in the audience cheering as she sees how many pickles can fit in her nose while singing the national anthem. Palin 2012!!


reply posted on 2-11-2009 @ 10:36 PM by centurion1211
reply to post by Snarf



My point was Palin never said "I can see russia from my house" as whatukno claimed. Period. But soooo many dems seem not to be able to tell reality from SNL fantasy, but they "feel" like they still vote intelligently. This is proof that they don't.





[edit on 11/2/2009 by centurion1211]


reply posted on 2-11-2009 @ 10:47 PM by Snarf
reply to post by centurion1211



Ohh, my bad.

Tina Fey saying "I can see Russia from my house" is so much and entirely different from Sarah Palin saying:

We-- we do-- it's very important when you consider even national security issues with Russia as Putin rears his head and comes into the air space of the United States of America, where-- where do they go? It's Alaska. It's just right over the border. It is-- from Alaska that we send those out to make sure that an eye is being kept on this very powerful nation, Russia, because they are right there. They are right next to-- to our state.


No similarities what so ever




reply posted on 2-11-2009 @ 10:59 PM by centurion1211
Originally posted by Snarf
reply to
post by centurion1211



Ohh, my bad.

Tina Fey saying "I can see Russia from my house" is so much and entirely different from Sarah Palin saying:

We-- we do-- it's very important when you consider even national security issues with Russia as Putin rears his head and comes into the air space of the United States of America, where-- where do they go? It's Alaska. It's just right over the border. It is-- from Alaska that we send those out to make sure that an eye is being kept on this very powerful nation, Russia, because they are right there. They are right next to-- to our state.


No similarities what so ever




No there are none.

But this is some great insight into the "thinking process" used by some (not all) dems and how obama was able to hoodwink them into voting for him to deliver "change" - never mind that few of them bothered to ask what change was and even fewer bothered to try and understand if they even got an answer to their questions. No, they just thought back to those idiot remarks someone convinced them that Palin supposedly said (but never really did) and that's how they decided who to vote for. And pssst! Palin wasn't running against obama, McCain was ...

if it wasn't so pitifully

[edit on 11/2/2009 by centurion1211]


reply posted on 2-11-2009 @ 11:14 PM by Snarf
reply to post by centurion1211



And pssst! Palin wasn't running against obama, McCain was ...

perhaps someone should have told that to McCain and Crew?



reply posted on 3-11-2009 @ 08:02 AM by Victoria 1
reply to post by OldDragger



Didn't come close to working? I beg to differ. obama got 51% of the votes, McCain got 49%. If there were a revote, obama wouldn't win.


reply posted on 3-11-2009 @ 08:04 AM by Victoria 1
reply to post by ZombieOctopus



That is messed up to say that, especially since Palin has a special needs child!


reply posted on 3-11-2009 @ 08:10 AM by vor78
reply to post by Victoria 1



Well, it wasn't quite that close. Obama won 53-46.

Of course, it was also a slightly smaller margin than the victory George HW Bush scored in 1988 over Michael Dukakis. Of course, we all know that Bush I went on to win re-election by another 'landslide' margin in 1992, too. Oh wait...


reply posted on 3-11-2009 @ 08:12 AM by Victoria 1
reply to post by Stormdancer777



That is how the dems get people, because most of them don't look into the truth, they just believe the left wing bias media. I guess that says a lot about the dems huh? LOL-no surprise here.


reply posted on 3-11-2009 @ 08:14 AM by SpacePunk
reply to post by Eurisko2012



Rush Limbaugh has lost his damn mind. Sure, Sarah Palin in the perfect candidate for the presidency if her supporters really, really, want the other candidate to win. She will never be presidential material. She's crooked, she's idiotic, she's.... oh never mind.
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^