CIT group officially declares bankruptcy, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 23 times


reply posted on 1-11-2009 @ 09:11 PM by CookieMonster09
Canada has one of the world's soundest banking system. Time will tell if that will remain so. Historically, Canada never went crazy with their lending policies, and has maintained a relatively conservative stance in their lending practices, unlike their American brethren.

As far as these American banks and lending institutions dying a "natural death", what I meant was that these bank failures - for anyone with the slightest understanding of lending fundamentals - was inevitable. You simply cannot lend money to unqualified applicants for any length of time before the defaults and foreclosures start to mount quickly. It's basic lending fundamentals.

If people have bad credit, sketchy work history, little if any capital reserves, minimal net worth, weak capacity to repay the loan - etc. - then it should be no surprise that the bank fails when they lend under these circumstances. That's what I mean by the idea that these banks need to die a "natural death". They dug their own graves when they engaged in these reckless lending practices.

Many, many businessmen and bankers in this country shook their head in disbelief at the reckless lending practices during the boom years. Anyone with a modicum of business sense knew that this would eventually come back to bite us, and that bank failures and bankruptcies would be the end result. It didn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that this was a disaster waiting to happen.

That's why CIT's failure is a natural death. The cause was reckless lending. The result was bankruptcy. The two go hand in hand and one naturally follows the other - always has, always will.


reply posted on 1-11-2009 @ 09:19 PM by sligtlyskeptical
Originally posted by peacelove
I could imagine many people looking at this post and not realizing the ramifications and the reasons underlying this bankruptcy.

simply put, CIT has offered commercial loans to most small businesses in our country over the past several years.

so, what does this bankruptcy reveal?

it reveals that the small businesses that have taken loans via CIT is UNABLE to pay off their loans.

unable to pay off their loans... because CONSUMERS are not purchasing.
consumers... which make up 70% of our GDP, are losing their jobs and losing purchasing power.

but the government doesn't care about the small businesses and small people... they will only bail out the big boys.


haha
what is the point in boosting government spending and bailing out big corporations when the PEOPLE are slowly being stripped of what they own?

the ralley we've witnessed in u.s. stocks is nothing more than a 'dead cat bounce', a painful reconciliation is due in my opinion.

i truly believe this is the catalyst.



They couldn't raise money by traditional means any longer. Non traditional means borrowing at higher rates then they were able to lend at. This was CIT's main problem. They lost all their sources of cheap money. Some loans went bad but most of the stuff CIT does is secured by the whole business so they rarely lose money on a loan. It was really a liquidity problem which has been made to look like a solvency problem.

CIT expected to be able to refinance as loans came due as they always did before, but the market changed and the cheap funds dried up. Once they issue a new stock, many of these loan losses and asset writedowns will be reversed and the new stockholders (I get some) will do pretty well, plus get an oversized rate of interest on the new bonds they will recieve.

CIT will be fine, they remain a valuable franchise. None of their operating companies are even part of the bankruptcy. It is just a formality to chnage the equity ownership.


reply posted on 1-11-2009 @ 10:05 PM by ProudFossil
Originally posted by DaddyBare
reply to
post by Trayen11



Guess that means that we tax payers are out the money the government sunk into CIT … All $2.3 billion.


Yes we are out the 2.3 billion. It was given to CIT in exchange for stock. That stock is now worthless and CIT does not have to repay a penny of it. In the list of creditors, the US will be at the bottom of the list.


reply posted on 1-11-2009 @ 10:32 PM by pynner
Originally posted by CookieMonster09
Canada has one of the world's soundest banking system. Time will tell if that will remain so. Historically, Canada never went crazy with their lending policies, and has maintained a relatively conservative stance in their lending practices, unlike their American brethren.



You have NO idea what your talking about...

Folks need to wake up..

ctv2.theglobeandmail.com...

"Canadian consumer debt loads were already heading in a worrisome direction before the crisis. The trend is now accelerating, driven by a large increase in mortgage balances among middle-aged people.

U.S. consumers, chastened by the destruction wrought by their profligacy, have lifted their savings rates to levels above 3 per cent, up from zero ahead of the crisis.

Canadians are going in the other direction. Household debt rose 3.4 per cent in the first half of the year, as personal disposable income fell 0.2 per cent, according to Mr. Tal. The debt-to-income ratio has risen to 140 per cent from 131 per cent in the past year.

Much of the new borrowing is mortgages, which have grown even as Canada's broader economy was contracting."

or

"But the decision to take on bigger mortgages isn't the result of bigger paycheques. In 2004, mortgage credit amounted to about 74 per cent of personal disposable income. Now it's 96 per cent."


or

"But what few Canadians realize is that the housing market has avoided collapse (prices are down 32 per cent in the U.S.) because the Harper Conservatives directed the CMHC to change the mortgage rules to effectively make the Canadian government the biggest sub-prime lender in the world. What's almost as alarming as this reckless policy is that no one in the financial media is talking about it, even though everyone knows the facts."

thetyee.ca...


but hey.. you know everything, right?

Just so you got it: "Conservatives directed the CMHC to change the mortgage rules to effectively make the Canadian government the biggest sub-prime lender in the world."





[edit on 1-11-2009 by pynner]


reply posted on 1-11-2009 @ 10:56 PM by CookieMonster09

but hey.. you know everything, right?

Pynner - Check your facts. Apparently, you can't read a word of what I wrote.

First, the Canadians have nothing on the greedy recklessness of the American bankers. Not even close.

It comes as no surprise that the government of Canada has intervened in the mini-mortgage crisis in Canada. That's to be expected.

And it comes as no surprise that more Canadians are increasing their debt load. That comes as hardly a surprise given the economic woes. But Canadian consumers are not bankers, now are they? They may be depositors - true enough - but they don't run the banks. Bankers do.

A little uptick in debt for the Canadian consumer? Ha. What a joke. You wouldn't believe the debt the Americans carry - credit cards, student loans, car loans, mortgages, home equity lines of credit, more credit cards, more credit cards, retail credit cards, etc. etc. We borrow more money to pay for what we borrowed.

Americans increased their savings rate? Yeah. I really believe that one. Many Americans are getting laid off, losing their homes, and you actually believe that they are saving more money? Where have you been? Have you even looked at our unemployment numbers lately? Huh? If anyone is saving more, it's the 2 pennies in their piggy bank that they saved when they were a kid. Most Americans are in debt up to their eyeballs.

(Funny how you forgot that I said the word, "Historically". I am not talking future events. Learn to read. I also said that only time will tell.)

Banking in Canada is widely considered to be the most efficient and safest banking system in the world. This according to a 2008 World Economic Forum Report which surveyed 12,000 corporate executives. (But then again, you know everything, right? More than 12,000 corporate executives who must be smoking bananas, right?)

So consider Canada the best of the worst if you deem fit. I would rather put my money in a Canadian bank than an American bank given the rate of bank failures we are seeing these days. We have over a 100 bank failures here.

At least Canadian bankers have a history of being a little more intelligent with their lending criteria than our American bankers.


reply posted on 2-11-2009 @ 03:27 AM by eldard
reply to post by Trayen11



R got it again! He posted this pic on his site Oct. 31:




reply posted on 2-11-2009 @ 06:36 AM by Nimrod
reply to post by pynner



Pynner, you are absolutly right about the federal gov. being now the biggest mortgage lender.

Where this astounding deficit this year went from ?

Flaherty bought up via Housing and mortage corporation and by the federal government 125 billions in mortage loans.

During the last federal election, it went almost unotice by mainstream medias, on purpose I guess. 75 out the 125 Billions was used to buy dubiuous mortages from banks.

It maintained a high level in house pricing, so it kept equity for consummers to keep on spending. But how much did we (as citizens) lost in these trades ?

125 Billions for Canada is quite 1 250 billions for the USA. If Canadian banking system is the soundest on earth ! well, how is it around the globe ? Freaking...... But canadian stimulus package is amazingly quiet and secret.


reply posted on 2-11-2009 @ 06:43 AM by Trayen11
reply to post by eldard



It was not really a stretch for him to do that as it was all over the news on the 30th....hell even before that. I even posted a thread here on the 29th saying they were going to declare.

This actually is not big news as most new it was coming anyways, R did not call this he just did what I did. Saw it on the news and posted it to his website.

Link to my other post about this

www.abovetopsecret.com...

[edit on 11/2/0909 by Trayen11]


reply posted on 2-11-2009 @ 07:16 AM by Trayen11
reply to post by Cabaret Voltaire



Not to burst your bubble there, but I seriously doubt the market will go down today. As I said at the begining of this thread, odds are the market will end up. People are going to spin this saying because this has been seen coming, the markets have already adjusted to it.

And dont you worry, the PPT will be out in full force to prop that baby up should it start to drop. got to keep the illusion that all is well, to keep those suckers in the market. Or draw some new ones in.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



USDA Forces Whole Foods To Accept Monsanto
  Posted 9 days ago with 99 member flags
Greece wipes out Citizens Debt!! Tells Bankers to suck it
  Posted 10 days ago with 78 member flags
The Collapse of The American Dream Explained in Animation
  Posted 17 days ago with 53 member flags
Obama on the verge of a deal with the banks
  Posted 15 days ago with 23 member flags
EU financial dictatorship agreed to by EU ministers last night
  Posted 17 days ago with 17 member flags
Bankers requesting that Greece become their debt slaves
  Posted 13 days ago with 15 member flags