CIT group officially declares bankruptcy, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 23 times


reply posted on 1-11-2009 @ 06:54 PM by RoofMonkey
Originally posted by Trayen11
Wonder what the markets will do about this tomorrow. For me my guess it will do nothing over it, due to the fact that the markets aremanufactured these days anyway. But the fall of CIT might be the begining of the Commercial real-estate collapse.


No... I think Capmark signaled that collapse. They filed Chapter 11 October 25th/26th time frame.

Oct. 26 (Bloomberg) -- Capmark Financial Group Inc., the lender owned by companies including Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and KKR & Co., filed for bankruptcy protection after posting a second-quarter loss of about $1.6 billion.

Capmark, based in Horsham, Pennsylvania, is one of the largest U.S. commercial real estate finance companies, with more than $10 billion in originations, according to Moody’s Investors Service. The company, formerly known as GMAC Commercial Holding Corp., services more than $360 billion of debt. It has struggled as the default rate on commercial mortgages held by U.S. banks more than doubled to the highest since 1994.


www.bloomberg.com...


Meanwhile, Citigroup, who is carrying some seriously bad notes... and about 45 billion in bailout and additional Treasury infusions, has a serious equity problem.

Their "general" lending, however, is almost certain to be severely curtailed. I have seen estimates that it could fall by as much as 90%, and that seems reasonable to me.

...

Of the company’s $1.2 trillion in credit commitments outstanding in the second quarter, $873 billion were credit card lines.


And the charge-off rate on those things is over 10%!


Here and here


[edit on 1-11-2009 by RoofMonkey]


reply posted on 1-11-2009 @ 07:19 PM by Zosynspiracy
reply to post by CookieMonster09



So what if those companies are debt free? That's only a handful out of how many? You know how many jobs Microsoft has outsourced to stay debt free? You know just how big of a government protected monopoly Microsoft has been since its inception? Don't get me started on how crappy Windows products are. The windows operating system is pretty much outdated obsolete junk as soon as it hits the market. Microsoft has ZERO competition...........they are a monopoly. If they had to compete trust me they wouldn't be "debt free".


reply posted on 1-11-2009 @ 07:41 PM by vor78
reply to post by peacelove



I agree. This is the one company that should have been bailed out due to the potential impact on small businesses around the country and the economy as a whole. Hopefully they're correct that they can come out of this and continue to function, because as many have indicated, if they are not able to provide a line of credit for retailers for this Christmas season, we may well see a wave of small business bankruptcies follow in the wake of this one.



reply posted on 1-11-2009 @ 08:06 PM by CookieMonster09

So what if those companies are debt free? That's only a handful out of how many?


You're missing the point. My point is very simple: Companies - and individuals - that are not bloated with debt have a much higher chance to succeed in this difficult economic environment.

And yes, there are companies and individuals who are completely debt-free. As I said before, this is generally rare nowadays, but there are some companies that still manage to run their businesses debt-free, and there still are individuals that manage to stay completely out of debt.

You asked for examples of debt-free companies, and I have you a handful.

Many entrepreneurs who have stayed in business for 10 years or more know the dangers of high debt levels. That's why most successful small businesses and successful entrepreneurs are very careful about taking on too much debt - and when they do, it's for a specific, practical business purpose (acquiring real estate, buying much needed equipment, etc.).

Anyone that works with small business owners in any capacity knows that the ones that succeed generally are very wise stewards of their money.

As far as your rant about Microsoft, read my comment above. You asked for examples of debt-free companies. I made no commentary on Microsoft's products, operating history, culture, etc. I also gave you 3-4 other well-known companies as simple examples of debt-free companies. Take a chill pill.

The benefit of the failure of CIT Group and their ilk, is that it will force entrepreneurs and businesses to run their businesses without relying on credit. Some will fail, and will have to shut their doors. For those that survive this crisis, they will be the better for it. Running a business debt-free is the way most businesses used to run, until our economy become so overbloated with debt and banks became ultra-aggressive in their lending practices.

Again, this is actually a good thing. Because we are cleaning out the waste in our corporate finance circles, and letting the loosey-goosey lenders die a natural death. That's a good thing.

Those banks and lenders that were overzealous in the boom years need to die off so that the well-run, conservative lenders can resume their rightful place in the marketplace.

This country needs sound, conservatively run banks and lenders. We have had way too many insane lending practices for way too long. I am actually glad that CIT failed. It will be painful, but it is a necessary step to a recovery. Giving CIT a bailout is like giving a drug addict more heroin. They need to file bankruptcy, clear out the waste, re-organize, and rebuild.



[edit on 1-11-2009 by CookieMonster09]


reply posted on 1-11-2009 @ 08:13 PM by traderjack
reply to post by projectvxn




They are allowing it, because they are all, and I mean all in on it! Republican, Democrat, whatever! If they are part of the 545 DC Hardcore Cons or part of The Chosen One's Army, they are in on it!


reply posted on 1-11-2009 @ 08:14 PM by honkusbobo
reply to post by CookieMonster09



My question is how "natural" any of this is. Considering that this fiasco is basically a cascading systems failure which began in the housing sector, I'd say the case can be made as to how much role government intervention played in the beginning of this.

Consider the Community Reinvestment Act.

Discrimination in lending was prohibited, so what are banks to do when they must lend to a vast underprivileged minority caste? The answer was to invent the twin demons of subprime lending and credit default swaps.


reply posted on 1-11-2009 @ 08:18 PM by sligtlyskeptical
Originally posted by jimmyx
this is going to screw up the recovery...this is going to put alot of people out of jobs...it's not going to be pretty. small businesses will start to fold and it could turn into an avalanche

online.wsj.com...


If they fail it won't be because of CIT. CIT will not operate any differently than they have in the past, except now they won't be squeezed for money for at least 5 years. This is goods news for CIT customers. If bondholders hadn't agreed to a prepackaged plan and they liquidated CIT instead then it would have been bad for the economy.

The government however was stupid. They will lose a few billion. If they had instead allowed CIT to become an FDIC bank then they would get paid back and shareholders wouldn't have lost ownership of the company. The goverment didn't interven after Bush left office because CIT is a Republican leaning institution.


reply posted on 1-11-2009 @ 08:22 PM by sligtlyskeptical
Originally posted by honkusbobo
reply to
post by CookieMonster09



My question is how "natural" any of this is. Considering that this fiasco is basically a cascading systems failure which began in the housing sector, I'd say the case can be made as to how much role government intervention played in the beginning of this.

Consider the Community Reinvestment Act.

Discrimination in lending was prohibited, so what are banks to do when they must lend to a vast underprivileged minority caste? The answer was to invent the twin demons of subprime lending and credit default swaps.


Thats another lie. Banks sold almost all their housing loans. So their real losses came from something else like writing insurance that they couldn't back. Even Fannie Mae only has a 4.5% default rate. Interest on their other loans should cover this amount. This is a big deep hole that hasn't been made public yet and all these shenanigans are just being used to cover up something else.



reply posted on 1-11-2009 @ 08:27 PM by honkusbobo
reply to post by sligtlyskeptical



Where have you been the last two years? People have been getting foreclosed on left and right, subdivisions are being abandoned in the construction phase, nobody's buying, and when they do, it's often from a bank that is taking a hit to their books!


reply posted on 1-11-2009 @ 08:28 PM by Trayen11
reply to post by honkusbobo



As to how "natural" all of this is, I cannot speak to that. I will say this, I believe it is obvious that this is starting to spiral out of control. We are up to what 110 banks forclosed this year alone in just the states? I wonder what the entire global number is at. (weirdly enough I did a search and saw no bank closing in Canada.)

But I think it is obvious that we may be reaching a breaking point here. If this is truely the start of the commercial real-estate bubble collapse I think we will see a major and defining crash in the states. The crash will most likely filter into Canada very fast. I know people here in Canada like to say that won't happen as Canada seems to have survive this recession pretty well, and so far that seems to be correct when you compare both countries side by side. But when you take into account a full collapse of USA's commercial sector then Canada is in big trouble as well.

Consider this 80% of our exports go directly south. Take into account no commercial commerce of significant measure happening in the States and it's not a big reach to realise we will have nowhere to put our exports. Que Canada's crash, of course it's not just Canada that will suffer think of UK, China, Germany, France, basically any big trader with the States.

Not to mention the millions in the States that are going to be effected first. You know truth be told I was almost excited thinking im going to graduate college in a few years and all my profs preaching that this is the perfect time to graduate as things will be swinging upward majorly at that time. I will admit I was actually falling for it. But the news today coupled with the possible ramifications of this, you can say I'm nervous now.


reply posted on 1-11-2009 @ 08:37 PM by sligtlyskeptical
Originally posted by honkusbobo
reply to
post by sligtlyskeptical



Where have you been the last two years? People have been getting foreclosed on left and right, subdivisions are being abandoned in the construction phase, nobody's buying, and when they do, it's often from a bank that is taking a hit to their books!


True, but the banks don't own the loans. They were packaged up and sold to individual and institutional investors. Even today, virually every new home loan and refinance is being sold to Fannie and Freddie who then sells it to other investors. In this case, the Federal reserve, because there is no one else left willing to buy them. The point is the banks only retained a small percentage of mortgage loans made over the last decade. I don't think there is any way they lost this much money just on mortgages they held.


reply posted on 1-11-2009 @ 08:48 PM by XPLodER
reply to post by CookieMonster09



i would like to point out with no links or facts to back up what i am saying
that some banks acually own the fed reserve in your country and they are the ones who will emerge with all that is left and
TAX money was paid by the fed to banks that acually own the fed (hard to get your head around i know)
and as the banks that are to big to fail own the fed they get your TAX money the scam is the the banks that own the fed got money to buy out the banks that dont own the fed and americans are on the hook for it
funney that these banks and the fed both have record profit from these transactions and the tax payer has record debt

cit proberly refused to be bought by fed/to big to fail banks
and is being burned at the stake like leiman bros

ps american fed loaned large sums of money to overseas banks to buy fed issuied bonds then after they were sold issuied fiat money against them and bought back the bonds GDP 2.5% was an accounting fraud
good luck world

Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



USDA Forces Whole Foods To Accept Monsanto
  Posted 9 days ago with 99 member flags
Greece wipes out Citizens Debt!! Tells Bankers to suck it
  Posted 10 days ago with 78 member flags
The Collapse of The American Dream Explained in Animation
  Posted 17 days ago with 53 member flags
Obama on the verge of a deal with the banks
  Posted 15 days ago with 23 member flags
EU financial dictatorship agreed to by EU ministers last night
  Posted 17 days ago with 17 member flags
Bankers requesting that Greece become their debt slaves
  Posted 14 days ago with 15 member flags