Port Arthur Massacre Setup - False flag to ban guns in Aus, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 45 times


reply posted on 1-11-2009 @ 04:15 AM by dallas18
Here is some information from investigative journalist Joe Vialls

Alleged Port Arthur gunman Martin Bryant. Photo on the left was used by the media to convince you of Martin Bryant's "guilt". Photo on right taken from a different angle, shows identical three men on balcony of the Broad Arrow Cafe, and the man alleged to be Martin Bryant running down towards the bus park at Port Arthur in the presence of a police helicopter.
This frame was shot at 2.45 p.m., more than an hour after the mass murder was over! This damning photographic evidence by itself proves Martin Bryant was deliberately set-up, wrongly accused and wrongly convicted. Remember, a camera cannot lie.
At 1.30 p.m. on Sunday 28 April 1996, an unknown professional combat shooter opened fire in the Broad Arrow Cafe at Port Arthur in Tasmania, Australia. In less than a minute 20 people lay dead, 19 of them killed with single high-velocity shots to the head fired from the right hip of the fast-moving shooter.
In less than thirty minutes at six separate crime scenes, 35 people were shot dead, another 22 wounded, and two cars stopped with a total of only 64 bullets. A moving Daihatsu 4WD driven by Linda White was crippled by a "Beirut Triple", normally reserved for dead-blocking Islamic terrorists driving primed car bombs around the Lebanon.
One sighting shot, a second to disable the driver, and a third to stop the engine before the primed car bomb can hit its target and explode. Very few people know of this technique, and only a handful of experts can master it with only three bullets.
This awesome display of combat marksmanship was blamed on an intellectually impaired young man called Martin Bryant, who had no shooting or military experience at all. As the book "Deadly Deception at Port Arthur" proves in absolute scientific terms, Bryant killed no-one at Port Arthur.
It is now up to the Australian Federal Government and people to track down those responsible for ordering and funding this loathsome terrorist attack against Australians on Commonwealth soil.

source

check this out too "And that explains rather simply just how Joe knew that the Port Arthur Massacre was in fact a Mossad covert operation, because he ran it."

2012unlimited.net...

who knows

[edit on 1/11/09 by dallas18]


reply posted on 1-11-2009 @ 04:45 AM by dallas18
reply to post by Pilgrum



Thanks for the insight mate, always good to have different perspectives shared with conspiracy topics. Do you remember if the following footage was aired by the media?

Originally posted by dallas18
Here is an interesting video, the youtube description:
What we have here is a team already onsite with a camera mounted on a tripod and pre-aimed at the Cafe. Listen also to the comments, "thats a shotgun"...hmm not # someone is shooting a gun here! They are not surprised, and why should they be, no doubt they were actaully WAITING to capture the event! And seeing as they recorded the start, one must assume that they kept the camera rolling and got the entire thing!
If so it was NEVER recorded as being available by the DPP in Court who bemoaned the lack of actual footage. One can only draw the conclusion that this footage actually existing would be very hard to explain. Incidentally, the man running from the Cafe is NOT the gunman who is still inside shooting.




Another video from same people




In these two videos, you can both hear 'that's a shotgun'. In the second, when the person is running away, a woman says it. And she says, 'see that person running there'.It kind of looks like the person running to the bus is carrying a shot gun?

Here is a photo of the same person (it appears), running to a police helicopter



And another image of him running away



This photo was used by the media to convince us of his guilt. It was shot at 2:45 PM an hour after the shootings.

? Is that the footage they were talking about here? If it is why does it appear he is running to the helicopter?

Many months after the massacre took place, but only hours before the Tasmanian judge was due to make a decision that would effect Martin Bryant for the rest of his life, an Australian TV network suddenly presented the public (and of course the judge) with dramatic amateur video footage shown "for the first time ever"


www.whale.to...

I was too young to have been aware of all this when it happened, so it would be great to hear some fellow Australians express what happened with media coverage and political debate regarding gun controls and this event around this time.

[edit on 1/11/09 by dallas18]


Who doctored video footage of a running man adding the soundtrack of shots from another video and presented this as Bryant ( prior to his trial ) which was also used at his trial as evidence which was shown on Channel 9's Ray Martin Current Affair Program ? Was it Channel 9 who did it and if so was it at Ray Martin's own instruction ? ( For Overseas readers Ray Martin was a TV Current Affairs Host with thoroughly anti-gun views ). Was it the DDP or the Tasmanian Police ?

The only media allowed near the scene was a Tasmanian WIN TV crew filming from a great distance who managed to film the capture of Martin Bryant stumbling clothes on fire from Seascape on the morning of the 29th April. Why were they given exclusive treatment - was it because they were part of this deception which was later evidence by them providing fabricated video footage to the CURRENT AFFAIR TV program ? It should be noted Easton told the Senate Inquiry there was "total containment" of the media - this was not true - the WIN TV filming proves that. And that answer was in relation to Senator Quirke's question asking whether ANY media were allowed within viewing distance of Seascape.


loveforlife.com.au...





[edit on 1/11/09 by dallas18]


reply posted on 1-11-2009 @ 05:19 AM by Pilgrum
reply to post by dallas18



I seem to recall seeing that 2nd picture on the news but not the video. If the video is genuine and it was handed in to police as evidence then it wouldn't have been publicly aired until after the trial (long time). Bryant was long gone from there before the police chopper would have arrived as the chopper is normally based at Cambridge airport which is very near Hobart airport some distance out of Hobart - maybe 10-15 minutes drive with sirens from Liverpool St to the runway. He would have made it back to Seascape by then in that hour

Should add my thoughts on the suggestion of a 'false flag' operation - it's somewhat unusual that he was taken in alive IE wouldn't it have been simpler if he'd been shot in that final siege?.



[edit on 1/11/2009 by Pilgrum]



reply posted on 1-11-2009 @ 11:53 AM by krystalice
reply to post by piddles



Give a killer a gun he has an objective.

Give a lunatic a gun he has none.



reply posted on 2-11-2009 @ 08:20 PM by dallas18
reply to post by TiM3LoRd



Ya i have thought this too. arent the us govt trying to get rid of your gun rights? . obviously the US population is far greater than australia's, so there would need to be a lot of 'massacres' to take place for it to be considered a real problem, cause a shock reaction and to demand the solution. something similar to mumbai i would imagine would be neccessary.. you guys have a right to arms though, dont let them take it away!


reply posted on 3-11-2009 @ 12:14 AM by chunder
reply to post by Kryties



Not that I agree necessarily with current gun laws but surely the point is that it would be difficult to slit the throats of 20 odd people in a cafe one by one, as opposed to shooting with a semi-automatic weapon.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Did Carl Sagan know something?
  Posted 18 days ago with 276 member flags
Earthly coincidences...or not.
  Posted 14 days ago with 122 member flags
Was this the real reason why Megaupload was closed down?
  Posted 19 days ago with 96 member flags
The Mysterious Death of Marilyn Monroe
  Posted 16 days ago with 85 member flags
Denver Airport Allows Camera Crew in Underground Facility
  Posted 16 days ago with 83 member flags