Don't want ``free health-care``? You go to jail, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 6 times
Topic started on 1-11-2009 @ 01:54 AM by Vitchilo
Sen. John Ensign (R-Nev.) received a handwritten note Thursday from Joint Committee on Taxation Chief of Staff Tom Barthold confirming the penalty for failing to pay the up to $1,900 fee for not buying health insurance.

Violators could be charged with a misdemeanor and could face up to a year in jail or a $25,000 penalty, Barthold wrote on JCT letterhead. He signed it "Sincerely, Thomas A. Barthold."

The note was a follow-up to Ensign's questioning at the markup.

The note:
www.politico.com...

Let's explain this...

Let's say i'm a libertarian. And I'm voting for Ron Paul. And I don't want this total control of US government over my life. And then this bill passes, and I have to pay the gov 1900$ because they imposed this legislation on me. I chose not to pay it, because, paying a fine to NOT have a service is against the most basic logic plus all the ideology involved.

Then, I would be charged with a misdeamenor, now correct me if i'm wrong, but that would make me lose my gun-owning right if found guilty. Plus, they would charge me 25.000$ and/or send me to jail for 1 year... and of course, there's all the middle ground of taking your car, your rights, your house, your children and your credit score, basically your whole life away, if you don't pay the government.

Their message is basically, BOW DOWN TO US, SLAVES.

So basically, refuse the government ``free health-care`` and YOU BECOME A CRIMINAL.

Obama, congress and the pharma lobby SURE ARE PRO-FREEDOM AREN'T THEY?

THIS IS OUTRAGEOUS and me thinks they try to arrest people over this, innocent people will die, feds and citizens.

So what will the Obama supporters will pull out of their butts to explain this one and how great it is?

EDIT: I tell you right now, I will not pay the 1900$ fine, nor the 25.000$ fine, nor go to jail. So you better come and arrest me right after this bill passes.

[edit on 1-11-2009 by Vitchilo]


reply posted on 1-11-2009 @ 01:56 AM by Janky Red
reply to post by Vitchilo



Should have gone universal healthcare then...

Two hundred years from now we will look likes primates and feudal tifts -
And sure as crap who will look like the apes? I am a Leftist Libertarian
and if the gov. was just the payee as in the universal model there would
no reason for government control in this manner. Anyhow, easy to remember
the government but its much easier to forget the problem. I think my righty
libertarian friends should reform their minds, its all our problem same as a war.

Anyhow don't worry, this fine business will not float - just wait until 2020
when healthcare is $25,000 per family- Via Sub Mexico!


reply posted on 1-11-2009 @ 03:48 AM by Common Good
reply to post by Vitchilo



"I chose not to pay it, because, paying a fine to NOT have a service is against the most basic logic plus all the ideology involved".

THAT...Was the strongest arguement I have heard so far when it comes to healthcare. B-R-A-V-O.

-side note.... I think universal healthcare for everyone would be a good thing, but not now. We simply arent that advanced in medical technology where we can simply give it away to everyone for free yet. In my opinion, until the medical industry advances its practices, cancers are cured at the cost of nothing, and medical equipment and drugs is at the point where it can almost cure anything;we will be foolish to put this healthcare for everyone into effect. WHO is anyone to say what you, or the next guy, or the person next to them, should be doing to help someone else out? If people want to help other people out, thats fine, but forcing people to do things they do not want to do was against the law the last time I checked, and not only that, but it is also just plain out WRONG.


reply posted on 1-11-2009 @ 03:51 AM by Janky Red
Originally posted by Common Good
reply to
post by Vitchilo



"I chose not to pay it, because, paying a fine to NOT have a service is against the most basic logic plus all the ideology involved".

THAT...Was the strongest arguement I have heard so far when it comes to healthcare. B-R-A-V-O.

-side note.... I think universal healthcare for everyone would be a good thing, but not now. We simply arent that advanced in medical technology where we can simply give it away to everyone for free yet. In my opinion, until the medical industry advances its practices, cancers are cured at the cost of nothing, and medical equipment and drugs is at the point where it can almost cure anything;we will be foolish to put this healthcare for everyone into effect. WHO is anyone to say what you, or the next guy, or the person next to them, should be doing to help someone else out? If people want to help other people out, thats fine, but forcing people to do things they do not want to do was against the law the last time I checked, and not only that, but it is also just plain out WRONG.


I keep saying it

What about ten years and the current inflation or private premiums

Can you afford double what you pay now?

I cannot - I work the industry and it is a middleman scam frankly

So will you be able to?


reply posted on 1-11-2009 @ 04:21 AM by Common Good
reply to post by Janky Red



10 years? Who knows what this world is going to be like in 10 years.
The way this govt is just running off and doing as they please should make you think that there might not even be an America in 10 years.

You can say...Ok...I think its time for EVERYONE to have cars. EVERYONE.
Well ok...that sounds good and all..but whos going to buy my car? You are. Are you ok with that?


reply posted on 6-11-2009 @ 07:13 PM by Seiko
reply to post by pieman



I just flabbergasted you looked this up yourself. You don't get all your news from chain emails?

The only reason I popped into this thread was to refute the idea of 'free", but it seems pointless now.


reply posted on 6-11-2009 @ 07:20 PM by pieman
reply to post by Seiko



actuially, i find that my most reliable source for news and views is the graffiti on the back of toilet doors, it just so happened that i was in cornell university law library earlier today and needed to take a dump............


reply posted on 6-11-2009 @ 09:45 PM by ANNED


I am a veteran on a combination of service connected and veteran disability pension. and i have free health care through the VA.

At the $985 i get from the VA a month after paying rent, utilities,
car insurance i have very little money left over.

And there is no way i am going to buy health insurance.

And they can not take it from my taxes because i do not pay any as the VA disability is not counted as taxable income.

Throw me in jail that would be a joke as it would then cost the jail system even more for my medical care then the VA pays.
and they could not even get me to work while i was in jail as i am disabled.

I do not think to much of this health care bill as it looks like it is written to just increase the profits of the insurance industry.

Most of the information from both sides in this debate has been bogus.

And the insurance industry has been feeding much of this information into the debate just to get what they want and eliminate what they don't want from the bill.

How many of you that have been following this bill have checked the sources on claims that have been made for and against this bill.

Many of the claims i have checked have ether bogus sources or sources that disappear within days after the claims are made.

This leads me to believe that the insurance industry is behind a lot of the disinformation.
and are shaping this bill with disinformation to get just the wording they want to increase there profits and cut there cost.

one story i keep hearing is if people that were injured in auto accidents that had to file for bankruptcy because of there medical cost because of the accident.
what happen to they auto insurance paying for this medical.
or was these stories of people that were driving without auto insurance and that is why they had to file banlruptcy.

and what and who will pay medical cost for auto accidents after these health care bill passes.
WILL the insurance companies DOUBLE DIP on us by requiring us to pay for health care insurance plus pay for medical cost under our auto insurance policies.

paying medical costs is one of the higher cost for the auto insurance industry.
and many of these companies sell both health insurance and auto insurance.


reply posted on 7-11-2009 @ 12:48 PM by MemoryShock
There is a more in depth thread on this topic here.

Please contribute any further questions and/or comments to the above linked thread.

Thank you.

Thread Closed.
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Senator Paul is being detained at the Nashville Airport by the TSA
  Posted 19 days ago with 89 member flags
Bruins goalie Tim Thomas takes stand against U.S Government
  Posted 18 days ago with 88 member flags
This is what happens when Ford announces they are hiring
  Posted 19 days ago with 77 member flags
Romney: "I\'m Not Concerned About the Very Poor"
  Posted 10 days ago with 73 member flags
The Girl Killed by Obama: She "never saw it coming"
  Posted 3 days ago with 62 member flags
Ron Paul In Nevada - The Caucus Is Rigged!! - w/VIDEO
  Posted 5 days ago with 60 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Anonymous hacks CIA
  Breaking Alternative News, Posted 15 hours ago, 109 replies
Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 10 hours ago, 94 replies
Hollow Earth Theory New Evidence.
  General Conspiracies, Posted 9 hours ago, 61 replies
Free will
  Philosophy and Metaphysics, Posted 13 hours ago, 50 replies