It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TheRepublic
i guess the fact that no terrorist attacks have taken place on US soil after 9-11, is bush's fault also.
Originally posted by ashley
Unless Bush cheats again he will lose with or without another terrorist attack.
Originally posted by Undomiel
[...] Bush is going to get a reaming no matter what he does. If he defends the nation, he gets a reaming (iraq/afghanistan). If he doesn't defend the nation (a possible terrorist attack in the future), he gets a reaming. If he tightens security he gets a reaming. If his security isn't tight enough he gets a reaming.
Originally posted by TheRepublic
i guess the fact that no terrorist attacks have taken place on US soil after 9-11, is bush's fault also.
Originally posted by TheRepublic
specialasianX:
Every example of pre 9-11 terrorism you gave happend in the clinton administration.
but im sorry, thats bushes fault too right?
Originally posted by mauskov
Originally posted by ashley
Unless Bush cheats again he will lose with or without another terrorist attack.
Cheats? What dope are you smoking..? Bush did not "cheat" the 2000 election. Despite the fact that Gore won the popular vote, Bush won the majority of the electoral vote; this decision was then supported by the Supreme Court. May I also remind you that the Supreme Court was not comprised of judges that Bush had appointed; rather, they were judges appointed by Clinton and the preceding administration.