Originally posted by ashley
Unless Bush cheats again he will lose with or without another terrorist attack.
? What dope are you smoking..? Bush did not "cheat" the 2000 election. Despite the fact that Gore won the popular vote, Bush won the
majority of the electoral vote; this decision was then supported by the Supreme Court. May I also remind you that the Supreme Court was not comprised
of judges that Bush had appointed; rather, they were judges appointed by Clinton and the preceding administration.
Additionally, what I personally find infuriating about what you've said is this swill about the 9/11 attacks. Here's the deal, sweetheart: The
attacks did take place under Bush's "watch," fine. There's no debate.
Do you honestly think he would have done nothing
if he'd known that there was going to be an attack?
Lest I remind you, as well, Clinton was given three direct
chances to intercept and kill Osama Bin Laden.
What about the bombing of the USS Cole? Pray tell, what administration did that
take place during?
Fact is, none of this is "Bush's fault."
What always gets my goat, too, is that while people like you squaek and rant and rave about how Bush coulda/shoulda/woulda
, you're the same
people that want to slice the defense budget at LEAST in half.
So let me get this straight.
It's acceptable, even laudable, to cut the defense budget, while at the same time expecting our nation to adequately secure itself and prevent
This liberal, leftist garbage makes me sick. Use logic, people. Not everything fits into your patchouli-soaked, birkenstock-wearing, all-natural
::steps off soap box::