Nasa Fermi telescope uncovers proof of space time theory

Quote from Daily Mail article:





"In this illustration, one photon (purple) carries a million times the energy of another (yellow). Some theorists predict travel delays for higher-energy photons. Yet Fermi data failed to show this effect"


Link to full article:

www.dailymail.co.uk...

Link to Nasa site:

www.nasa.gov...

Quote:



(A video is included on the Nasa site).


Another article:

news.stanford.edu...


[edit on 31-10-2009 by berenike]

I have question though.
Would this go against Everett's model of many worlds or simply parallel universes?

reply to post by sphinx551

---

Er... let's hope someone can give you an answer.

I'll confess here that I know very little of this sort of thing. I saw the article and thought it might interest people here.

I was surprised that no-one else had found it and posted it, so I'm just hoping that it's the right sort of thing to post in this forum.

I seem to recall there was also a more recent case where travel delays for higher energy photons was actually observed, delays of minutes IIRC.

Thats pretty damn cool. I think that Einstein had help from extraterrestrials because his theories were way ahead of his time.

Maybe you should do your research properly. Here's one hint:

www.aulis.com...

If you want to give credit to a true genius read about Tesla. If it wasn't for the greed and corruption of some individuals we would be visiting other stars.

[edit on 31-10-2009 by broli]

Are you saying a typical scholastic attempt at research would guide you to this site?

That's a pretty offensive response to someone's thoughts. Can you offer proof that none of those scientists that Einstein "plagerized" were influenced by anyone else? Of course not.

This is what scientists do, they do research that includes reviews of peers work. Once in awhile, you get someone who can tie it all together - this is not plagiarism. Einstein provided the push needed to move the world forward past the stumbling blocks that were at that point hypothesis at best. Einstein made it law.

I guess you would say the same of Stephen Hawkings since he spent his life reading other's work to aid his understanding of the universe.

Anyone who makes the statement you made in your post doesn't have a good understanding how scientific research works, are anti-semetic, or simply jump on the bandwagon way too often.

If you'd like to do that research yourself, see if you can tie the Special Relativity effects and Lorentz transformations together on your own.




[edit on 31-10-2009 by BuffaloJoe]

I have a question for the scientists.

How do you know the particles left at the same moment. couldnt one have come from another event, from another gamme ray burst, and just happened to be travelling beside each other? I am no scientist, so I was just wondering. Seeing one event is not enough to close the book.

Ummm... you'd need the String Theory for that, right? Yep, that's a pun

Let's play nicely,kids.

reply to post by berenike

---

Breaking a self-imposed silence to say: well spotted, and many thanks for alerting ATS.

'Tired light' is dead--not that any scientifically literate person ever thought it was alive. A sad day for Young Earth Creationists and electric-universe fantasists, a rare red-letter day for rationality on ATS.

reply to post by Le Colonel

---

Gamma-ray bursts are not very frequent, and rather hard to miss while they're happening.

Maybe you haven't noticed but to date special and general relativity are called THEORIES not laws. And that still doesn't change the fact that Einstein did not include a single reference in his paper.

Your so called science has taken a stray path for the past 100 years and that's nothing to be proud of. Like I said before if you want the prime example of science look up Tesla and read his lectures. Einstein has got nothing on that man yet the only line I can find in my physics books is "the unit of magnetic strength is named after Nikola Tesla."

What I find offensive is the fact that Tesla and most of his big inventions are lost while the atomic bomb is more popular than ever. Tesla knew what we was saying when he didn't agree with Einsteins stolen formulas, because he had the experiments to prove them wrong. But did anyone listen? I guess not.

100 years later and we're still on the stray path.

[edit on 1-11-2009 by broli]

reply to post by broli

---

What were these experiments that proved him wrong? Just asking because if they exist then they can be recreated...

Good to see you posting Astyanax, ATS is only as rational as the posts that people contribute so thanks for breaking your self-imposed silence to add some rationality to a site that can use some.

I agree tired light never made much sense but it's nice to see some more confirmation nonetheless.

@Broli, note that BuffaloJoe has a point. How can you post a link in the science section that claims the moon photos were faked as a source? Links like that belong in the conspiracy section, not the science section. I don't claim to be a relativity expert, however scientists do study each others' work so the originality of any idea can always be examined, however I think Einstein abandoned the ether concept in special relativity which Poincaré who he supposedly plagiarized from did not abandon the ether concept in his scientific writings.