Nasa Fermi telescope uncovers proof of space time theory, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 14 times


reply posted on 31-10-2009 @ 07:28 PM by berenike
reply to post by sphinx551



Er... let's hope someone can give you an answer.

I'll confess here that I know very little of this sort of thing. I saw the article and thought it might interest people here.

I was surprised that no-one else had found it and posted it, so I'm just hoping that it's the right sort of thing to post in this forum.



reply posted on 31-10-2009 @ 09:16 PM by BuffaloJoe
Originally posted by broli
Maybe you should do your research properly. Here's one hint:
www.aulis.com...


Are you saying a typical scholastic attempt at research would guide you to this site?

That's a pretty offensive response to someone's thoughts. Can you offer proof that none of those scientists that Einstein "plagerized" were influenced by anyone else? Of course not.

This is what scientists do, they do research that includes reviews of peers work. Once in awhile, you get someone who can tie it all together - this is not plagiarism. Einstein provided the push needed to move the world forward past the stumbling blocks that were at that point hypothesis at best. Einstein made it law.

I guess you would say the same of Stephen Hawkings since he spent his life reading other's work to aid his understanding of the universe.

Anyone who makes the statement you made in your post doesn't have a good understanding how scientific research works, are anti-semetic, or simply jump on the bandwagon way too often.

If you'd like to do that research yourself, see if you can tie the Special Relativity effects and Lorentz transformations together on your own.




[edit on 31-10-2009 by BuffaloJoe]



reply posted on 31-10-2009 @ 11:31 PM by Astyanax
reply to post by berenike


Breaking a self-imposed silence to say: well spotted, and many thanks for alerting ATS.

'Tired light' is dead--not that any scientifically literate person ever thought it was alive. A sad day for Young Earth Creationists and electric-universe fantasists, a rare red-letter day for rationality on ATS.


reply posted on 31-10-2009 @ 11:35 PM by Astyanax
reply to post by Le Colonel


Gamma-ray bursts are not very frequent, and rather hard to miss while they're happening.


reply posted on 1-11-2009 @ 06:35 PM by XTexan
reply to post by broli



What were these experiments that proved him wrong? Just asking because if they exist then they can be recreated...


reply posted on 2-11-2009 @ 11:54 AM by Arbitrageur
Originally posted by Astyanax
reply to
post by berenike


Breaking a self-imposed silence to say: well spotted, and many thanks for alerting ATS.

'Tired light' is dead--not that any scientifically literate person ever thought it was alive. A sad day for Young Earth Creationists and electric-universe fantasists, a rare red-letter day for rationality on ATS.


Good to see you posting Astyanax, ATS is only as rational as the posts that people contribute so thanks for breaking your self-imposed silence to add some rationality to a site that can use some.

I agree tired light never made much sense but it's nice to see some more confirmation nonetheless.

@Broli, note that BuffaloJoe has a point. How can you post a link in the science section that claims the moon photos were faked as a source? Links like that belong in the conspiracy section, not the science section. I don't claim to be a relativity expert, however scientists do study each others' work so the originality of any idea can always be examined, however I think Einstein abandoned the ether concept in special relativity which Poincaré who he supposedly plagiarized from did not abandon the ether concept in his scientific writings.



reply posted on 7-1-2010 @ 10:40 AM by kraig87
reply to post by kingoftheworld



I think Einstein may have been way ahead of his time because he used 10% of his brain and the average human only uses like 2-3%

More research into Mapping and unlocking our brains we must do.


reply posted on 7-1-2010 @ 02:53 PM by mnemeth1
Originally posted by Astyanax
reply to
post by berenike


Breaking a self-imposed silence to say: well spotted, and many thanks for alerting ATS.

'Tired light' is dead--not that any scientifically literate person ever thought it was alive. A sad day for Young Earth Creationists and electric-universe fantasists, a rare red-letter day for rationality on ATS.



I think the findings highlight the fact that gamma ray sources aren't coming from "edge of the universe" explosions.

More on the ridiculous non-sense of gamma rays can be found here.

The amount of baseless assumptions in the OP report are too numerous to list.


reply posted on 8-1-2010 @ 12:16 PM by beebs
Interesting news, thanks OP.

reply to
post by Astyanax



Wondering why this has negative implications for electric universe theories?

Do you believe space is empty?

How do gravitational waves propagate?

Can waves travel in something called a 'vacuum' in the true sense of the word(in which we have never actually observed something that displays our preconceived characteristics of 'vacuum')?

Also, it should be noted that they did not get detected at the same moment, but slightly off.

Anyone interested in more history of this sort of problem/question in physics might enjoy:
michelson-morley experiment
zero point





reply posted on 8-1-2010 @ 01:16 PM by Maslo
Originally posted by mnemeth1
Originally posted by Astyanax
reply to
post by berenike


Breaking a self-imposed silence to say: well spotted, and many thanks for alerting ATS.

'Tired light' is dead--not that any scientifically literate person ever thought it was alive. A sad day for Young Earth Creationists and electric-universe fantasists, a rare red-letter day for rationality on ATS.



I think the findings highlight the fact that gamma ray sources aren't coming from "edge of the universe" explosions.

More on the ridiculous non-sense of gamma rays can be found here.

The amount of baseless assumptions in the OP report are too numerous to list.


;;;;


And I think it neither disproves tired light model, neither supports electric universe. All it does is proving that light essentialy travels with the same speed, no matter the wavelenght, to high accuracy.
Pages:     ^^TOP^^