White house visitors list, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 4 times
Topic started on 30-10-2009 @ 11:56 PM by unfndqlt
Just another fine example of the elite's double standard when it comes to the law. Is this a huge event or conspiracy no, probably not, but a blatant slap in the face of every law abiding citizen.


No previous administration has released such a list, though the information out so far is incomplete. Only about 110 names —and 481 visits —out of the tens of thousands who have visited the Obama White House were made public. Like the Bush administration before it, Obama is arguing that any release is voluntary, not required by law, despite two federal court rulings to the contrary.





Not that Bill Ayers The White House warns that many names that may appear familiar — and controversial — do not in fact refer to the most famous people to carry those names. Jeremiah Wright is on the list, but it's not the president's former pastor. This Michael Jordan is not the basketball player. This Michael Moore is not a filmmaker. The William Ayers who took a group tour of the White House isn't the former radical from Chicago who figured so prominently in the 2008 campaign. And the Angela Davis on the list has a different middle initial than the activist and former fugitive.


Really.... I mean really? Every one of these examples is supposed to be just coincidental? My feeling is; some are real, and some are not. Is it really that surprising, no not really, but I guess in an ideal world we would be allowed to see and understand what is truly going on.

www.msnbc.msn.com...

[edit on 31-10-2009 by unfndqlt]
edit again for gramer

[edit on 31-10-2009 by unfndqlt]


reply posted on 31-10-2009 @ 12:02 AM by honkusbobo
reply to post by unfndqlt



Flagged and starred. Now, I'm not questioning the veracity of this, because I believe I saw it on Drudge, which, IMO at least, is usually pretty solid, but can you put up a link for the rest of us?


reply posted on 31-10-2009 @ 09:58 AM by unfndqlt
reply to post by whatukno



Its not about left or right. The big deal is there have been two court cases, both against the previous administration that they have to disclose this information. I have a problem when they say to be more transparent then ever, then disregard court orders saying they have let us know whos visiting the white house. It is not surprising in the least bit though. I'm just trying to point out the hypocrisy.


reply posted on 31-10-2009 @ 10:04 AM by whatukno
reply to post by unfndqlt



I understand, I agree that this information should be made public. It's after all our house. We the people should know who enters our house.

But you know the opposition will take every opportunity to ridicule and freak out about EVERY single person that goes into the white hose.

But, it's our house after all, we deserve to know who goes in there.


reply posted on 31-10-2009 @ 10:44 AM by whatukno
reply to post by dizzie56



Ugg! I am so sick of that.

Really people. Everyone knew when Obama said that his administration would be the most transparent in recent history it was a complete and utter lie.

Politicians lie. Yes this is an easy lie to say. Cmon, is this any worse than "no new taxes."?


reply posted on 31-10-2009 @ 11:23 AM by dizzie56
Originally posted by whatukno
reply to
post by dizzie56



Ugg! I am so sick of that.

Really people. Everyone knew when Obama said that his administration would be the most transparent in recent history it was a complete and utter lie.

Politicians lie. Yes this is an easy lie to say. Cmon, is this any worse than "no new taxes."?


No, its not worse, but does it make it better because everybody else is doing it? That is how the man got voted in by the masses thru his lies that you and I saw. A lie is a lie and the lier should be reminded of it whenever possible as well as the believers of the said lie.



reply posted on 31-10-2009 @ 11:43 AM by whatukno
reply to post by dizzie56



If you voted for Obama over this lie, than you deserve what you get.

People need to really research what they are voting for. No matter what it is.


reply posted on 31-10-2009 @ 12:17 PM by dizzie56
Originally posted by whatukno
reply to
post by dizzie56



If you voted for Obama over this lie, than you deserve what you get.

People need to really research what they are voting for. No matter what it is.


Your correct on both. But most people need to get a swift kick in the rear to realize that it is a lie instead of just being gullable.


reply posted on 31-10-2009 @ 04:36 PM by Eurisko2012
reply to post by unfndqlt



Here is the list so far.
Lincoln Bedroom Visitors - Michael Moore How many times?!
George Soros is making himself at home.
I wonder who they left off this list?


reply posted on 1-11-2009 @ 06:36 PM by jerico65
news.yahoo.com...

Celebs, Democratic fundraisers, lobbyists.

People are cheering that Obama is being "transparent", but forgetting that he said he wasn't going to be dealing with Lobbyists, etc.

So much for that promise.
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Senator Paul is being detained at the Nashville Airport by the TSA
  Posted 18 days ago with 89 member flags
Bruins goalie Tim Thomas takes stand against U.S Government
  Posted 18 days ago with 88 member flags
This is what happens when Ford announces they are hiring
  Posted 19 days ago with 77 member flags
Romney: "I\'m Not Concerned About the Very Poor"
  Posted 9 days ago with 73 member flags
The Girl Killed by Obama: She "never saw it coming"
  Posted 3 days ago with 62 member flags
Ron Paul In Nevada - The Caucus Is Rigged!! - w/VIDEO
  Posted 5 days ago with 60 member flags