Both forms of galactic alignment on 2012 proven to be false, page 1

I posted this because even the people showing the 2012 theories to be wrong are letting this slip by them. This is the biggest slam dunk, if you do the math this will, without a doubt, demonstrate that Tsarion, Wilcock, Icke etc. didnt do a bit of real research before selling this to us all.

Please watch this. The first 2 or 3 minutes of part one will explain why both forms of alignment are literally impossible, you will kick yourself for not thinking of this before.


I have heard for many years that on December 21, 2012 the earth was going to align with the sun and the center of the Milky Way Galaxy. I used to point to this coming event as the reason there would be a pole shift as well as any number of cataclysms. I discovered recently while doing the research for the 2012 debunked video that this was very untrue.

To show you how scientifically impotent the galactic alignment theories are I will need to show you the difference between the twenty six thousand year precession cycle and the two hundred and fifty million year cycle of the solar system’s revolution around the galaxy. Most 2012 gurus will pick one or the other, or they mix up the two as they stumble through a pseudo scientific presentation that might sound fancy until you see the difference between the two.

First Precession:

precession2

This event is only significant from the earth’s point of view. The precession cycle or the 26,000 year wobble of the earth only causes the EFFECT of the stars changing position on the horizon. and therefore on the effect of galactic alignment. if you were viewing this “precession” from anywhere else in the solar system it would be totally insignificant, There is no gravitational force or radiation to be expected from this event because other than the tilt of the earth, nothing will be any different than the last few thousand solstices, and as such, the Earth will be no closer to the galactic center than any other solstice, in fact we will be much further away from galactic center than the Mayans were at that time.

The other camp of belief surrounding the 2012 alignment issue is probably the more significant of the two because it is dealing with the solar system’s actual location in relation to galactic center. The idea is that our little solar system is moving around the center of the galaxy every 225 to 250 million years or so, and while doing so it is moving up and down in a cycle crossing the plane every 33 million years.

arrow32

So, the question is, are we going to cross that galactic plane in 2012?

Not even close. According to the journal nature, as well as many others, there is evidence of crossing this plane 3 million years ago. This would mean that we are moving away from the galactic plane and won’t be due to cross it for another 30 million years. In addition the margin of error in these calculations in at least 2.1 parsecs or about 6.5 light years making images like these completely meaningless.

To conclude:
If you hear someone tell you that the earth is on a 26,000 year cycle to align with the galaxy ask them how the wobble of the earth will change its position in relation to the galaxy.

Similarly, if you hear someone say that the earth is on a 250 million year cycle to align with the galaxy ask them if they know that this happened 3 million years ago and wont happen again for another 30 million.

[edit on 31-10-2009 by Amenti]

[edit on 31-10-2009 by Amenti]

reply to post by Amenti

---

That's all well and good, but do you really think people who take Tsarion, Wilcock, Icke seriously, can be swayed by logic and rational thought?

I'm being serious. I mean, there aren't that many people left who truly buy into the whole 2012 doom scenario anymore, the ones left are more in the religious/spirituality/loony camp and you won't be coaxing them out of their bomb shelters anytime soon.

Originally posted by ZombieOctopus
reply to post by Amenti

---

That's all well and good, but do you really think people who take Tsarion, Wilcock, Icke seriously, can be swayed by logic and rational thought?

I'm being serious. I mean, there aren't that many people left who truly buy into the whole 2012 doom scenario anymore, the ones left are more in the religious/spirituality/loony camp and you won't be coaxing them out of their bomb shelters anytime soon.

lol well for those who think its all enlightenment and sunshine I recently made this to take a guess at why the "spiritual evolution" thing is being pushed so hard.

reply to post by Amenti

---

honestly you can go both ways on the subject,but it nice see both sides

reply to post by Amenti

---

quick mathematic note, 250 million -3million is not 30 million...im wondering how u got 30 million outta that?

Originally posted by THIseNdsnowoldKings
reply to post by Amenti

---

quick mathematic note, 250 million -3million is not 30 million...im wondering how u got 30 million outta that?

as we travel around galactic center (250mly) we are also moving up and down in a cycle that takes (33 mly)

2012, Awakening within, the third eye...it\'s all coming together.
  Posted 13 days ago with 38 member flags

Russians know, We assume, NASA is silent ...
  Posted 11 days ago with 35 member flags

Sun flares affect our pineal gland, causing mass awakening?
  Posted 3 days ago with 34 member flags

Are we paying attention enough? Strange Sounds in the sky
  Posted 18 days ago with 33 member flags

Bring Your Toothbrush? A Journey To The Stars...
  Posted 8 days ago with 23 member flags

2012 Believers are the Definition of Sheeple
  Posted 15 days ago with 14 member flags

Tell me to stop
  Posted 7 days ago with 11 member flags

The Chevy Silverado 2012 Mayan Apocalpse Commercial
  Posted 7 days ago with 10 member flags

Newest topics, updated in real-time:

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time: