It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ecoparity
reply to post by Maya00a
So every climatologist in the entire World is on the global warming side? Apparently "they" were only able to influence so many given more than half of them are on the other side of the issue.
The popular conspiracy is the same way - unless they can control every scientist in the entire World capable of analyzing a virus or testing a vaccine they can't accomplish the plan without being caught.
Just like global warming, at least a few are going to speak out and leave a debate on the table for people to take sides on.
The anti-vaccine crowd paints anyone who dares to disagree with them as being a "big pharma supporter". They just can't believe there's a balanced point of view in there somewhere.
I'm speaking out about lies being used to manipulate people, I'm not defending the drug companies, in fact I've made several posts in which I make my position perfectly clear. Every few pages someone else comes along, picks a fight over the Baxter incident and uses my position on it to try and paint me as being a supporter of big pharma and so on.
I don't get into bed with parties who have to use dishonest tactics to try and push their agenda, regardless of how the conspiracy shapes up. Real conspiracies don't require lies and word games to stand - they are self evident.
The new strain of swine flu is spreading and thanks to a two week incubation period you won't realize it until it's too late. People are here because they obviously have questions and want to know what's really going on since the WHO and media won't tell them.
Those of you who made your minds up that it's all a hoax meant to get the bioweapon vaccine into you have no purpose here other than to try and push your agenda onto others. I'm not telling anyone what to do, I think each person has to make a decision on their own, especially when it might mean life or death.
Maybe it's just me but I don't want a bunch of lies involved in that decision process. Like it or not, Jane Burgermeister and the GLP forum have done just that, inserted lies into the equation. I have more respect for other people's lives, especially their children than to do that.
Anyone continuing to pimp those falsehoods needs to take that fact seriously enough to either give it a full investigation or stop contributing to the confusion. You might very well end up helping someone to die.
I'm here to help give people accurate information and that doesn't include further childish debates with people I feel are being completely irresponsible. If that means ignoring attacks or placing the people who launch them on ignore then so be it.
Originally posted by ecoparity
Obviously the chart I posted only has the "official" deaths on it. I wanted to see if anyone would notice the 500 or so missing deaths in Europe.
SNIP
Originally posted by ecoparity
reply to post by Maya00a
Obviously not all of my post was directed at you, I was explaining the overall situation.
I've provided sources and documentation for anything I've posted.
There is one source behind the Baxter story, Jane Burgermeister and half the people arguing about it haven't even bothered to check into the source of origin. They just take the reports being passed on by people like Alex Jones and assume they are true.
On July 23rd Jane posted that a military drill in the US was going to be used to launch martial law and that everyone should start attacking FEMA and other government facilities, PREEMPTIVELY.
Usually when someone in the alt media proposes acts of violence without getting arrested or even questioned it's a fairly good bet they are agent provocateurs.
That's the person who gave us the inside story on the "Baxter Incident". A few of us try to give you the actual government documents, an interview with a retired government health official who would have been directly involved in such an incident and we're attacked for it.
I can't help but notice no one is reporting the truth on this or at least "my side of it" as you say. The entire alt media community minus a couple of people are repeating Jane's lies like their gospel and the rest of the sources are pushing the WHO official party line.
There aren't very many of us over here on this side of the fence but somehow we're the bad guys with an agenda in all this? Whatever...
Let's stick to news and updates on Ukraine and save the distractions for the threads they belong in.
KIEV, UKRAINE -- One night at the height of the panic over what people here call the California flu, as 24-hour news stations tracked a rising death toll and politicians speculated about a mystery lung plague, Ukraine's prime minister rushed to the airport to greet a shipment of Tamiflu as if it were a foreign dignitary. Not to be outdone, the president, a bitter political foe, dispatched a top aide to meet the plane, too.
Originally posted by ecoparity
reply to post by Kailassa
If you believe in the Baxter conspiracy then you have Jane Burgermiester to thank for it, she's the source of the entire thing.
She's also the only person to make the claim of "72 kilos" of material. That's her making the quote in the Polish TV video everyone likes to post as proof.
I'll go with the official version of events as related in the EU briefing.
Just to get this straight, you keep making arguments and comments about the Baxter incident yet claim you don't get them from Jane Burgermiester?
That indicates your entire source for your position is secondary blogs and discussions, you've never even gone to the primary source on the issue.
Believe what you want to believe, I don't waste my time on fools.
Christopher Bona, Baxter's director of global bioscience communications, said the liquid virus product was not a vaccine and was developed for testing purposes only. He deferred questions about the purpose of the testing to Avir Green Hills, but said the batch was to be used in animals and was never intended for use in humans.
"It was a combination of just the process itself, (and) technical and human error in this procedure," Bona said. When asked to elaborate, he said to do so would give away proprietary information about Baxter's production process.
Originally posted by Chevalerous
SNIP
I think even Bloomberg-News wrote two articles which most accepted as proof to exactly what happened in that Czech facility when someone there thanfully tested a part of the 72 kg of vaccine material on the ferrets which were meant for vaccine production by sub-contractors to Baxter.
SNIP
[\quote]
Please try to find it! I'm pretty sure that this is original storyline from CZ local newspaper. I hope I have hard copy on some HDD - but I'm bit chaotic being master of hundreds HDDs ... And offcourse working inet link is better argument then personally stored file.