reply to post by chiron613
If I've got a medical question, I go to medical sources, not to a musician. If I'm looking to hire a band or a musician, I don't call my doctor. If
I have appendicitis, I don't call Smashing Pumpkins.
Great idea! Since a musician could never be a doctor either!
I understan your train of thought and great points,
however a musician may have more 'real life' experience and even a keener insight in many 'gray' areas. Indeed, bordering on ESP even?
As to the title of the post,
as long as the proper research has been done properly,
why does it matter so much who is the one doing it?
There is enough information out there for all to look at.
Enough to make one wonder anyway even being a bit skeptical.
After all, doctors have much to gain from an outbreak, true?
As much as big pharma also?
The vaccine market is booming right now. Already, drug companies have sold $1.5 billion worth of swine flu shots, in addition to the $1 billion for
seasonal flu they booked earlier this year.
But some say it's not just drugmakers who stand to benefit. Doctors collect copayments for special office visits to inject shots, and there have been
assertions that these doctors actually profit handsomely from these vaccinations
articles.mercola.com...
The prospect of a bird flu outbreak may be panicking people around the globe, but it's proving to be very good news for Defense Secretary Donald
Rumsfeld and other politically connected investors in Gilead Sciences, the California biotech company that owns the rights to Tamiflu, the influenza
remedy that's now the most-sought after drug in the world.
money.cnn.com...
Hmmmm.....nah its nothing. Really. Just good bidness. And big money!
Duh! I forgot my whole point.
It is all this,
but mostly it is a distraction to keep us from thinking about the emmense
screwing we're getting. Kinda like the very HC bill. Ironic just a bit, eh?
No big whoop. Keep moving......
S & F!
[edit on 31-10-2009 by dodadoom]