The White House Facebook Page Deleted My UFO Disclosure Topic!

Originally posted by flice
Also keep in mind, just because you write something on the board of what might be a public institution that doesn't mean they don't have the right to delete posts or edit them.

Facebook is NOT a public space in the sense that you can say anything and expect it to remain there... I myself reserve the right to untag, delete or if possible edit anything written on my wall.
I would expect they feel the same way.

Originally posted by ALLis0NE
However, the OP jumped to conclusions and automatically assumed they were "extraterrestrial" when there is still no reason for anyone to believe they are. When you straight claim they have reversed extraterrestrial technology and ask to disclose it, you set yourself up to look like a nut case.

Originally posted by ALLis0NE
Of course they could say "no comment" as to stay neutral and to avoid people jumping to conclusions, but even if they did that people would STILL jump to conclusions.

Originally posted by ALLis0NE
My argument is that they didn't delete the message to "hide information" or to "suppress freedom of speech".... they deleted it because it was a really badly written request that doesn't even deserve an answer.

Originally posted by ufo reality


I don't know who I'd contact. The White House?

[edit on 29-10-2009 by ufo reality]

Dear President-elect Barack Obama,

I recently ran across an article on the Defense Department's website ( www.dod.mil... ) that deeply concerns me. In this article it explicitly states:



This is verifiably false.

In the year 1967, two year before Project Blue Books doors were shut and in the middle of the Condon study, in Montana at the Malmstrom AFB Oscar-Flight Missile Launch Control Center (LCC), a perimeter security guard phoned the on-staff Deputy Crew Commander (DMCCC), Captain Robert Salas, in the LCC capsule to report an inexplicable glowing-red object floating over the facility.


Not believing this Capt. Salas told the man to phone back when something more significant happened.

Five to ten minutes later the guard called again, more distressed, to report that the object was approaching the gate. This time Salas instructed the guard to secure the site and went to wake his commanding officer, Lt. Fred Meiwald, from his scheduled sleep period. While briefing Lt. Meiwald the alarm klaxon sounded and lights at the commander's station flashed indicating missiles were entering a "no-go," or unlaunchable, condition.

In total Oscar-flight lost six to eight missiles that morning. Each silo ran on a completely separate and independent system to prevent cascading failures. Several miles away at Echo-flight, under similar circumstances, another LCC crew lost all ten of their missiles. The loss of one missile due to system failure let alone eighteen is so statistically improbable as to be unprecedented.

The factualness of this is verifiable through FOIA and Boeing documentation detailing to what extent SAC investigated the failures. Robert Salas has also since written a book titled Faded Giant to broaden awareness on this matter. In it, he notes Declassified Strategic Missile Wing documents along with interviews of ex-Boeing engineers’ reveal tests could not identify a cause for missile shutdowns; likely explaining why in one declassified correspondence SAC stated the incident “was of very grave concern to this headquarters." Mr. Salas has also gone before the National Press Club and stated he’s willing to testify before Congress to the truthfulness of this story. ( www.youtube.com... )

With all of this a matter of public record how is it that the DOD publicly states, "No UFO reported, investigated, and evaluated by the Air Force has ever given any indication of threat to our national security?”

The defense implications are obvious and frightening. In view of this event we desperately need public congressional hearings to determine why Blue Book was shutdown. We need to understand why the USAF neglected to inform the Condon study of this case, especially since the findings of the Condon Report were one of the few justifications for closing Project Blue Book. In absence of congressional action we deserve a full report from the DOD and USAF spelling out how this does not constitute a national security threat!

I implore you to discuss this issue with your cabinet, the Congress, the Senate, the Defense Department and the United States Air Force.


The nonsense surrounding this issue has gone on long enough. We deserve real answers about our security!


Concerned citizen,

John Q. Public

1e.) Recruitment/Solicitation:

i) You will not use your membership at The Above Network, LLC site(s) for any type of recruitment to any causes whatsoever. You will not post, use the chat feature, use videos, or use the private message system to disseminate advertisements, chain letters, petitions, pyramid schemes, or any kind of solicitation for political action, social action, letter campaigns, or related online and/or offline coordinated actions of any kind.

ii) You will not use the discussion boards, the chat system or the private message system to collect or ask for the personal information (data mining) about forum members, including email addresses and "real life" names, in any manner whatsoever, or for any reason whatsoever.

iii) You will not post, use the chat feature or use the private message system to solicit members of The Above Network, LLC on behalf of another message board, online community or competitor. You will not attempt to use your membership to encourage or lure other members in any way to other websites or discussion boards in competition with The Above Network, LLC. Doing so will result in removal of your post(s) and immediate termination of your account.

Originally posted by IgnoreTheFacts
Doesn't matter if they delete it or not. This subject will not have any traction, nor get off the ground until we do some serious house keeping.