AboveTopSecret.com Video and Media Portal.Books, posters, and more.T-shirts, mouse pads, cups, and bags.Member podcasts.Conspiracy theory wiki.Alternative news headlinesBelowTopSecret.com - off topic and general chit chat.AboveTopSecret.com - conspiracy theories and


 

 

This topic is in the Aircraft Projects discussion forum.  (rss)


Russian president backs nuclear spaceship




Topic started on 29-10-2009 @ 07:17 AM by Did you see them


Quote:

"Russia laid out its ambition to gain an edge in the space race by building a nuclear-powered spaceship.

But the plan outlined to a government meeting Wednesday left key questions unanswered, U.S. engineers were skeptical, and a Russian Greenpeace activist voiced concern.

Federal Space Agency chief Anatoly Perminov told the meeting that the preliminary design could be ready by 2012. He said it would then take nine years and 17 billion rubles ($600 million) to build the ship."


www.msnbc.msn.com...


I always thought nuke power in space was banned but ...

"The U.N. outer space treaty, in force since 1967 and ratified by 105 countries including Russia and the U.S., was designed to keep outer space free of nuclear weapons. It makes no mention of using nuclear energy for nonmilitary purposes."

So that's how they get round it.

Anyway it will be interesting to see how this develops given the current economic climate



   copyright & usage 
Click here for more Aircraft Projects topics
Hot Topics   |   Top Topics   |   This Week   |   Subscribe   |   Home


reply posted on 29-10-2009 @ 07:42 AM by Now_Then


$600 million? That don't buy you much in terms of space ship development I wouldn't of thought...

2nd line.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 29-10-2009 @ 07:43 AM by mrwiffler


I'll wager a large sum that nuclear engines have been developed quite extensively. I'm only speculating but I have been looking for evidence for some weeks now. Let you know if I find any.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 29-10-2009 @ 08:16 AM by Chance321


Okey, help me out here. Russia's back in the space race, but I thought they were supposed to be broke? Wasn't that the excuse they gave when the US had to foot the bigger part of the bill for the space station.



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 29-10-2009 @ 08:19 AM by Wayne60


reply to post by Chance321



This could be part of the reason they were broke. They may have been spending what did not have on this idea. Just a passing thought.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 29-10-2009 @ 08:33 AM by James R. Hawkwood


Originally posted by Now_Then
$600 million? That don't buy you much in terms of space ship development I wouldn't of thought...

2nd line.


Well, wages and prices in Russia are lower so with that amount of money, you can do alot, especialy if the tech is available and if you work efficient enough.

Heck! for 20 million dollars you can buy a seat onboard the Soyuz if you want to.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 29-10-2009 @ 08:35 AM by andy1033


Originally posted by mrwiffler
I'll wager a large sum that nuclear engines have been developed quite extensively. I'm only speculating but I have been looking for evidence for some weeks now. Let you know if I find any.


Yep, i would say they must be plenty of generations down the road. Stanton friedman talked about he worked on these sorts of projects, though we only have his word for it, i would suggest that there must be plenty of those types of things going on.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 29-10-2009 @ 08:38 AM by James R. Hawkwood


Originally posted by Chance321Okey, help me out here. Russia's back in the space race, but I thought they were supposed to be broke?


Who is broke? Russia or Roskosmos? Either way, those 2 are anything but broke Chance321.

Russia itself hasnt got any big debpt at all and Roskosmos its budget is growing steadily every year and is so busy at the moment that with the retirement of the Shuttles, space tourism has been put on hold just to accomodate all of the Cosmonauts in the Soyuz capsules.

Wasn't that the excuse they gave when the US had to foot the bigger part of the bill for the space station.


Source please?



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 29-10-2009 @ 08:58 AM by Chance321


reply to post by James R. Hawkwood



Just something I remembered hearing on the news quite a few years back when they first started building the station.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 29-10-2009 @ 07:49 PM by jra


Originally posted by Chance321
Okey, help me out here. Russia's back in the space race, but I thought they were supposed to be broke? Wasn't that the excuse they gave when the US had to foot the bigger part of the bill for the space station.


Back during the 90's after the collapse of the Soviet Union and a financial crisis in '98. Russia was doing pretty poorly, but they've recovered since then and there economy has been growing fairly well it seems.



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.




















































ATS Server: www2.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.005 seconds
Page processed in 0.038 seconds
6 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.