Originally posted by OldThinker
No True Christian has ever been abducted by Aliens! Right?
Here’s a quick summary…Not sure who the authors are, but I agree with the premise.
-Ufologist Dr. J Allen Hynek, asks a penetrating question, “if the aliens have traveled across the universe to be with us, why don’t they stay?
What’s up with all the in and out, here and there? Where are they when we DON’T see them? Great questions!!
-Author Bryan Reeves, also asks why would they travel across the galaxy with a “down with Jesus, up with eastern/oriental philosophy” message?
Doesn’t add up to me, doesn’t make sense!
-“Communion” author Whitley Streiber recognizes that what he saw, MAY be demonic evil…
-Author Dave Hunt acknowledges that real/physical scratch mark have been seen by those under hypnosis…without doing it themselves, documented…how
can this happen?
-‘Mothman’ author and non-christian, John A Keel, likens UFO abduction to biblical “demon possession” Wonder why?
-The video goes on to discuss how the ‘crafts’ are actually demons themselves. Hmm??? Have you seen the new ABC syfy series ‘V’? Guess what
happens to the craft as it is seen by the multitudes? No! OT, it doesn’t turn into a person, does it?” Yep!!!! Check out the trailer and Episode 1
intro below…
1. Dr. J Allen Hynek publically later renounced his previous trust in the government's motives and conclusions about UFOs, emphasizing the
significant number of eyewitness with high credibility and otherwise unexplainable through conventional science
2. Bryan Reeves is challenging the alien's philosophy or reason for being here, which no one actually knows in the first place. So, it's a
textbook case of building a strawman argument.
3. Whitley Streiber - How does he know what "demons" look like? He doesn't. There's no evidence they exist, let alone meet a particular set of
criteria.
4. David Hunt - If in deed scratch marks did appear during a hypnosis session, please explain what evidence you have of who or what caused the
scratches. It's just as likely that he was scratched by an invisible bear made out of cheese. Jumping to the conclusion that "demons" had
attacked him absent a reasonable chain of deduction is absurd. You can't blame "demons" when you've yet to prove that they even exist - a
necessary precursor.
- John A. Keel's point would seem to be that people in ancient times who may have observed ETs would likely have identified them as Demons because
the idea of aliens from another planet would have been far too complex and beyond their comprehension. Demons are the only explanation that would fit
into their limited view of the world at the time.
I first assumed this thread was a joke. It's arrogant to believe you could possibly ascertain an ET's motives, beliefs, and technology. You even
went so far as to recommend people watch the V pilot to gather intelligence!! It's just a fictional TV SHOW!
The quotes you're citing offer little more than a cheap gag. You have transformed speculative gossip into a "reliable source." It also seems that
you had to twist, crop, and embellish upon their words in order to get your message across. If Demons are as powerful as you make them out to be,
why do they require aircraft or spacecraft to get around? That's fairly advanced technology at their disposal and yet they don't seem interested in
abusing their power to destroy mankind or the innocent.
[edit on 7-11-2009 by andrewh7]