It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by budski
What I'm saying is, why not discuss the topic rather than the source - because discussing the source smacks of derailment and disinfo attempts.
Originally posted by JohnnyCanuck
Originally posted by budski
What I'm saying is, why not discuss the topic rather than the source - because discussing the source smacks of derailment and disinfo attempts.
If a post comes up that is based upon a tainted or unreliable source...and that is cited as a factual premise for the OP, then it becomes fair game as well.
Opinions are opinions, facts are facts, and the two are not interchangeable.
Originally posted by budski
WIKI is much derided, but is actually a very good source if cross referenced.
MSM can be a good source if cross referenced.
The National Enquirer can be a good source if cross referenced.
You get the idea.
Originally posted by budski
The National Enquirer can be a good source if cross referenced.
Originally posted by Bunch
Trying to find a relaible source on a conspiracy website?
Im with the OP on this one, the basic premise of the thread should be discussed and whoever wants to challenge the information presented should do their own research and present their findings.
What I see here is that people outright dismiss the information because they personally dont like the source and thats just ignorance at its finest.