Fox anchor admits "Lack of Balance", page 1
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 4 times


reply posted on 28-10-2009 @ 12:42 PM by vor78
reply to post by Rhetoric



Yes, and I'll say it again: on the basis of the clips you've presented, Shepard Smith is the one exhibiting bias for the reason I stated above.

On the other hand, there is no evidence presented to suggest that Shannon Bream's explanation is anything but factual. If Corzine will not grant an interview, what is she supposed to do?

[edit on 28-10-2009 by vor78]


reply posted on 28-10-2009 @ 01:05 PM by Rhetoric
reply to post by vor78





Origionally posted by vor78
On the other hand, there is no evidence presented to suggest that Shannon Bream's explanation is anything but factual.


True, except for her reaction, both physical and ver, ver, ver, verbal.

Clearly, I'm no fan of Fox-News, no surprise there I'm sure, but I just knew that there would be some people here that would refuse to admit that they're not "balanced", even when the networks own Anchor does admit it.

-Denial aint just a river in Egypt folks.


reply posted on 28-10-2009 @ 01:09 PM by vor78
reply to post by Rhetoric



I never claimed that they were balanced. I'm simply saying that on the basis of the evidence you've presented, Shepard Smith is the one who is exhibiting bias, not Shannon Bream, by misrepresenting the poll numbers.

If you have tangible evidence that Shannon Bream is lying and that she has not attempted to interview Corzine , by all means, provide it.


reply posted on 28-10-2009 @ 01:09 PM by Bored To Tears
Originally posted by Rhetoric
reply to
post by vor78





Origionally posted by vor78
On the other hand, there is no evidence presented to suggest that Shannon Bream's explanation is anything but factual.


True, except for her reaction, both physical and ver, ver, ver, verbal.

Clearly, I'm no fan of Fox-News, no surprise there I'm sure, but I just knew that there would be some people here that would refuse to admit that they're not "balanced", even when the networks own Anchor does admit it.

-Denial aint just a river in Egypt folks.


He didn't admit FNC isn't balanced, just that one story.

Live TV can be a bad thing sometimes.


reply posted on 28-10-2009 @ 01:30 PM by Aggie Man










reply posted on 28-10-2009 @ 01:35 PM by Bored To Tears
reply to post by Aggie Man



There really isn't anything to comment on. He called out a journalist because he felt she didn't do a good job and apologized for it.

*snip*


Mod Edit: Removed personal reference aimed at another member.

[edit on 10/28/2009 by maria_stardust]


reply posted on 28-10-2009 @ 04:05 PM by TreadUpon
reply to post by Rhetoric



So let me get this straight...They lead with the interview that WAS granted then Sheep was upset the democrat wasnt coming on. The democrat isnt granting interviews to FOX. So if Shep had it his way, the democrats not granting interviews to FOX is reason enough to stop doing interviews with republicans too?

I was right. He IS a butt-head. FIRED!


reply posted on 28-10-2009 @ 04:19 PM by pavil
reply to post by TreadUpon



Yeah, I don't get how interviewing a candidate that is willing to appear is somehow unbalanced when the other person won't appear on a certain network.

Of course, it needs to be proved that FOX put in requests for the Gov. to appear.

The Polls do seem to indicate a very close and contested race.
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



Bruins goalie Tim Thomas takes stand against U.S Government
  Posted 19 days ago with 88 member flags
Romney: "I\'m Not Concerned About the Very Poor"
  Posted 10 days ago with 73 member flags
The Girl Killed by Obama: She "never saw it coming"
  Posted 4 days ago with 62 member flags
Ron Paul In Nevada - The Caucus Is Rigged!! - w/VIDEO
  Posted 6 days ago with 60 member flags