It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Coming in December: World government

page: 2
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in


posted on Oct, 28 2009 @ 11:19 AM
I've read the treaty, and yes, it is similar to a European Union treaty - significant hidden information about a new bureaucracy that will monitor the progress.

It goes on to highlight a implementation, and creation, of a single low-carbon global economy. Other draconian measures on the third world, in the technology transfer program, and the United Nations will meditate it.

The wealth transfer (apart of historical carbon debt measures) comes with penalties and rules on the those receiving the financial support.

[edit on 28-10-2009 by infinite]

posted on Oct, 28 2009 @ 11:23 AM
reply to post by infinite

May you please post a link for everyone to the treaty? I have only been able to find bits and pieces so far. Then again, I'm not very good with Google.


posted on Oct, 28 2009 @ 11:33 AM
reply to post by JJay55

The secret cabal? the royals?Aliens?
There has to be someone at the helm steering this planet, I suppose in all honesty i do not really know That would be a thread all on its own..

posted on Oct, 28 2009 @ 11:36 AM
reply to post by NovusOrdoMundi

Here's a draft treaty in a pdf file.

Copenhagan teaty draft

It's long, have fun reading.

posted on Oct, 28 2009 @ 11:37 AM
link world gov't my a$$.
it would be One Country + Canada, cause there's no way Canada is going in on this!

posted on Oct, 28 2009 @ 11:44 AM

Originally posted by foxhoundone
reply to post by JJay55

The secret cabal? the royals?Aliens?
There has to be someone at the helm steering this planet, I suppose in all honesty i do not really know That would be a thread all on its own..

But you can't name them... right?
You have some very strong opinions about them but it's some vague higher power... hmmmm. That's interesting. just sayin.

There are specific players and they aren't hard to track down with research. Forbes makes a list of worlds richest people every year, but those aren't the big fish. But it's not about wealth, there are other factors to consider like military strength, territory and population.

posted on Oct, 28 2009 @ 11:46 AM
reply to post by ontariocanada

Say what you like matey but when you think about it its not that far off,
Take language for an example English is established as the planets first language, Another example money, All world trade is done in dollar euro or yen, The classic ISS "international" space station.. is that not a one world type project ???..

posted on Oct, 28 2009 @ 11:51 AM
reply to post by JJay55

Your quite correct JJ,
As you state its not money oriented i think it has something to do with leading the human race to a higher plain so to speak, Your quite right i will have to study this thoroughly... Thank you

posted on Oct, 28 2009 @ 11:54 AM
UN-FCCC-Copenhagen 2009

[P = paragraphs]

P.24 - stop unilateral measures from nations states in terms of countervailing goods and services. Overules national law

"Conference of the Parties", governed by the Convention will set short term targets and monitoring their success.

P.36- 37 New institution that will provide legal framework. Provide technological and financial support to developing nations.

P.38 The word "government" appears along with "executive body" in relation to the new institution in p36-37

P.50 Institutional arrangements are explained under the self titled section.

P.55 efficient system of governance

P.57 Bureaucracy are named and explained. Refereed to as "branches"

A few examples. The word "nation state" is replaced by "parties"

posted on Oct, 28 2009 @ 11:56 AM
Someone mentioned the idea of world government not being a bad idea. I agree, a (excuse the nerd reference) Star Trek TNG scenario, where all humans across the globe or simply Earthlings is a preferable goal.


Who will be in charge? US lead globalization is real and happening. There is enough evidence to prove our government has been hijacked by bankers and big corporations, so if we use this country as the example, what are we in store for on a global scale? A world of undereducated consumers?

To stay on topic, I saw the Youtube video that showed the speech in question. I cannot confirm that the man speaking was indeed Lord Christopher Monckton, adviser to Thatcher, but I can say the source is correct as to what he warned of. If it is indeed him, I too wonder what his real agenda is. Given his Thatcher associations, I doubt he has the little people's needs in mind.

posted on Oct, 28 2009 @ 11:58 AM
Whether the OP source is accurate or not, the fact remains that climate change will be used as a tool for politics. And it appears the United Nations are poised to escalate their role to that of a world government.

We strongly believe that the United Nations must become the principal custodian of our global human security…A major restructuring of the world’s income distribution, production and consumption patterns may therefore be a necessary precondition.

These are the words of the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) from their "Human Development Report" from 1994.

This was also from the same report.

“Global taxation may become necessary in any case to achieve the goals of global human security. Some of the promising new sources include tradeable permits for global pollution, a global tax on non-renewable energy, demilitarization funds and a small transaction tax,”

Note that this was in 1994, before most of the "global warming" hype. But the important thing is, this was NOT to reduce the effects of climate change. The UN wanted a tax on global pollution(carbon tax) for the purpose of funding the United Nations, NOT to discourage pollution!

Now the UN's own IPCC is the main voice that governments around the world are listening to when looking at climate change, and consequently, setting carbon taxes or 'emmission trading schemes'. Conflict of interests, maybe?

For more info see this thread:
NWO to be funded by Climate Change!

Note. When the thread refers to NWO, it is not a conspiracy term, but the term used in the reports from the UN and an organization with close ties to the UN called "Socialist International".

[edit on 28-10-2009 by Curious and Concerned]

posted on Oct, 28 2009 @ 12:02 PM

I love to read.

[edit on 28-10-2009 by HappilyEverAfter]

posted on Oct, 28 2009 @ 12:03 PM
reply to post by budski

Yes it's coming but we must watch for any new treaties created from the Group of 20 Leaders,,-G-20. These ones will be irreversible and have a lot more clout than simply economics.

I am opposed to a "One World Government" based on many reasons, including my religious beliefs. There is no way to stop it. A NWO is being created as we speak. Only a few loose ends to fix.

posted on Oct, 28 2009 @ 12:04 PM
Hey I'm all for a world government, but my terms for one are completely different. Freedom, abolishing all money and corporate giants, and banks, all leaders step down, disclosure, we are taught advanced systems and medicine from the Federation and Andross Delegations, and we advance. We adopt a moneyless system of high education, constant retraining and volunteering, that is much smaller hours, say 4 a day, 5 times a week for healthy people, and non-child tenders. And we our health is improved, with extremely good nutrition. All poisons and nuclear gone forever, and advanced energies found. Absolutely no bloodlines, for they are in a galactic time out. Incredible health and dental and education for all and eco homes for all. Nearly all bodies of law abolished. Psi development eveywhere so we begin to ascend, and develop the Universal Understanding and feel each others thoughts, and truly care. No one goes without, no one, no man, woman or child in any country is controlled by religion or government, or the other sex in any way shape or form, and the world becomes cosmic, with local governments still running things, by the people, for the people, in complete unity and understanding of both individual freedoms and sharing and equality.

Otherwise its not happening. NWO will never get off the ground overtly.

posted on Oct, 28 2009 @ 12:15 PM
reply to post by wonderworld

Dont make anything into statements, or affirmations, for we create metaphsyically with our minds, and affirmations, statements, absolutes is one of our of our creational skills. Instead, this is the way to go:

"I am free from the matrix, the people are free, awake, aware and happy, they are healed, and filled with joy, peace and unity. Disclosure is now, we are being taught by our cosmic friends and family. A new utopia is beginning for humanity and earth. We are healing mother earth and nature and she is being restored gently with humanity safe and powerfully protected. Divine Mother's Plan has been achieved, and the earth and its people ascend and evolve."

Envision a powerfully different even taking place, disclosure, and not Vrill. The skies filled with Freedom, and Freedom's representatives, and advancement. People relieved and happy as all is explained, and that the earth changes are being mitigated. The advancement into a unifed, yet free future, with people healed and educated and earth restored and healed as well. See, affirm, state it, and stand up and say NO to anything else, like Max Igan talks about, non-compliance, and in their faces. This other thing, isn't ever going to make it to the light of day.

But, cosmically, done in proper way to ensure world peace and human rights, the United Earth Council, would be needed, to join the cosmos, that is the protocol. If its nwo, and if its set up looking like money, bankers, bloodlines, corporations or controlling Sharia law type regligions everywhere, guess what, someone is lying, for these arent the good guys.

[edit on 28-10-2009 by Unity_99]

posted on Oct, 28 2009 @ 12:27 PM

Originally posted by
reply to post by foxhoundone

There are many benefits that people seem to miss about a single government.

One main one: If there were global standards on working conditions (such as a global minimum wage) there would no longer be any great incentive to outsource/offshore work to countries with cheap labour rates.
[edit on 28/10/09 by]

Unless of course, the same standards prevalent in the 3rd/developing world are forced on the west, whilst welfare states are abolished so it becomes a case of work or die.

Any benefit can pretty much be turned and seen as a negative.

This only becomes beneficial if we are "ruled" by beneficient people - that's not usually the case...

Many thanks for posting the draft treaty - appreciated.

[edit on 28/10/2009 by budski]

posted on Oct, 28 2009 @ 12:28 PM
One world government... 1970 "Colossus: The Forbin Project".

"This is the voice of world control." - cool!

I vote for it. But only if Colossus is in charge.

posted on Oct, 28 2009 @ 12:28 PM
reply to post by budski

Only redistribute wealth around the globe, eh?

And who gets to choose who gets and who loses money???

Another take money from those who work and earn it so it can be given to those who do not????

I must admit, a global minimum wage would help the West and really hurt Asia.
Manufacturing moved their for cheap labor, if that was no longer the case, it would be worth it to build what you consume locally-removes over sea shipping.

[edit on 10/28/2009 by mrmonsoon]

posted on Oct, 28 2009 @ 12:30 PM

Originally posted by mrmonsoon
reply to post by budski

Only redistribute wealth around the globe, eh?

And who gets to choose who gets and who loses money???

Another take money from those who work and earn it so it can be given to those who do not????

But why is an hour of your time more valuable from an hour of someone else's time who just happens to be on the other side of the globe.

Most of the wealth in the west came from quite literally raping the 3rd world, so your argument is more than a little moot.

posted on Oct, 28 2009 @ 12:31 PM
reply to post by wonderworld

Sorry? Why bring "religion" into it??

Wait....allow us to guess.


One of the newer large "religions" that prevail (and currently continue to hamper) in Humanity as it strives to achieve balance.

A true "One World" body of governance will include ALL, regardless of creed.

Even the somewhat disparate beliefs....whether they be of a Giant Tortoise that supports the Universe on its back, or the Judeo/Christion/Islamic traditions that are much more recent --- and yes, those three are ALL the same --- the point of a truly advanced society is being able to accept and incorporate those differences, in a civilized manner. WITHOUT subjecting those who have a different "belief" from yours to unnecessary subjugation.

To follow on the rather 'corny' (yet relevant) notion of the "Star Trek" ideal Universe is the acceptance and polite acknowledgement of diversity that will (hopefully) define a more advanced culture in the future....

[edit on 28 October 2009 by weedwhacker]

top topics

<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in