Eating Animals is Making us Sick, page 19
Pages: <<  16    17    18    19    20    21    22  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 27 times


reply posted on 10-11-2009 @ 03:32 PM by DevolutionEvolvd
Originally posted by STFUPPERCUTTER
we can go back and forth all day as to whether or not meat is good or bad for us, making us healthy or sick.
but please stop saying people need it. if people needed it i would have died years ago.
you want it, you may like it, you may think its healthy, but you sure dont need it.
you need water, you need air, you need food.
but you do not need meat, its a choice.


You don't need to eat carbs. The body only needs about 120 grams of glucose to fuel the brain and central nervous system, everything else runs on fat. That 120 grams can easily be synthesized from protein in the diet, and, if needed, can be produced from the glycerol molecule that binds fatty acids together to form triglycerides.

Luckily, the body has an amazing ability to adapt to dietary changes. In the short term, burning carbohydrates almost exclusively for fuel is acceptable and is sustainable. In the longterm, however, this process of consuming high-carbohydrate meals causes; oxidative stress, glycation and Advanced Glycation End-products, or AGEs.(which contribute to heart disease, alzheimers and dementia); increased Triglyceride levels, which increases VLDL, which increases LDL; Decreased LDL size(very atherogenic); Decreased HDL; greater liklihood to store fat and not release it, which causes obesity/overfat and causes hunger/overeating.

Carbohydrates, especially fructose, are lipogenic, meaning they cause fat storage and inhibit lipolysis, the release of fat to be burned as fuel.

If, for some reason, you can eat the foods you eat and are healthy, by all means, keep it up. However, generally speaking, Protein/fat promote good health while carbohydrates promote bad health. This is evidenced by clinical trials and is corroborated by multiple observations.

-Dev


reply posted on 10-11-2009 @ 04:04 PM by DevolutionEvolvd
Originally posted by dzonatas

Humans are categorized as to have hands to make tools, like guns.

Hence, we are meant to pull a trigger and to kill.

You just justified Fort Hood as a fact of life we are to just accept as it is "meant to" be by your standards.

Edit: Some of us have human limits.

[edit on 9-11-2009 by dzonatas]


Ahhh yes. You're so much better than us.

If you truly believe that eating meat, which is a healthy choice for human beings, is the same as grabbing a gun and shooting multiple people based on religious/political upbringings, then you, sir/ma'am, have real problems and should be careful with your accusations.

How is eating meat making me sick when meat is devoid of carbohydrates, which cause Obesity and diabetes while contributing strongly to heart disease, all of which are "SICKnesses" that are atop the mortality list in America?

I understand that meat consumption is correlated with incidences of cancer; however, correlation does not imply causation. Carbohydrate consumption is also correlated with incidences of cancer.
Heart Attack incdience is correlated with shaving less frequently. Does that mean that shaving less causes heart attacks? No. How do we know that heart disease doesn't cause one to shave less? Dog tail chasing is linked to hypercholesterolemia. Does that mean that a high choelsterol is caused by tail chasing? No. How do we know that high cholesterol doesn't cause tail chasing?

Confusing cause and effect( or correlation and causation) has been a huge downfall for scientific researchers over the past 50 years or so.

And, unfortunately, the majority of studies published in nutritional research journals are observational due to their low cost and ease of conducting.

-Dev


reply posted on 10-11-2009 @ 08:23 PM by STFUPPERCUTTER
Originally posted by DevolutionEvolvd
Originally posted by dzonatas

Humans are categorized as to have hands to make tools, like guns.

Hence, we are meant to pull a trigger and to kill.

You just justified Fort Hood as a fact of life we are to just accept as it is "meant to" be by your standards.

Edit: Some of us have human limits.

[edit on 9-11-2009 by dzonatas]


Ahhh yes. You're so much better than us.

If you truly believe that eating meat, which is a healthy choice for human beings, is the same as grabbing a gun and shooting multiple people based on religious/political upbringings, then you, sir/ma'am, have real problems and should be careful with your accusations.

How is eating meat making me sick when meat is devoid of carbohydrates, which cause Obesity and diabetes while contributing strongly to heart disease, all of which are "SICKnesses" that are atop the mortality list in America?

I understand that meat consumption is correlated with incidences of cancer; however, correlation does not imply causation. Carbohydrate consumption is also correlated with incidences of cancer.
Heart Attack incdience is correlated with shaving less frequently. Does that mean that shaving less causes heart attacks? No. How do we know that heart disease doesn't cause one to shave less? Dog tail chasing is linked to hypercholesterolemia. Does that mean that a high choelsterol is caused by tail chasing? No. How do we know that high cholesterol doesn't cause tail chasing?

Confusing cause and effect( or correlation and causation) has been a huge downfall for scientific researchers over the past 50 years or so.

And, unfortunately, the majority of studies published in nutritional research journals are observational due to their low cost and ease of conducting.

-Dev

i dont know why you feel the need to try and drag others down to your level. if your feeling threatened by other peoples beliefs, i suggest you ask yourself why. jsut because you dont see the problem, or dont care to do anything about it, doesnt mean others are willign to sit idly and do nothing.
i think its great taht some of us have made an attempt to make the world a better place, go take ur negativity eslwhere. and cut back on taht red meat bro, its makign you pretty agressive.


reply posted on 11-11-2009 @ 12:44 PM by DevolutionEvolvd
reply to post by STFUPPERCUTTER



No. You're deterring from the subject at hand and have played a major role in derailing this thread. If you'd like to discuss the ethics and meat consumption then feel free to start your own thread in. That, however, is not the discussion that was intended by the OP.

It's clear you have no idea the physiological effects of nutrient consumption, which explains why you've consistently ignored my posts and instead have attacked me personally.

You and Divenoroums will not garner anymore of my attention, as it's clear I'm wasting my time falling for your trolling tricks.

If you'd like to discuss something with me, like an adult, I'd be happy too. If you can turn your blatant, fact-devoid attacks into intelligent debate, then I'll engage in discussing the MATTER AT HAND. Until then, your posts are nothing but wasted bandwidth, to me.

-Dev


reply posted on 11-11-2009 @ 02:31 PM by dzonatas
Originally posted by DevolutionEvolvd
reply to
post by STFUPPERCUTTER



You're deterring from the subject at hand and have played a major role in derailing this thread. If you'd like to discuss the ethics and meat consumption then feel free to start your own thread in. That, however, is not the discussion that was intended by the OP.

It's clear you have no idea the physiological effects of nutrient consumption, ...


And yet, quoted directly from the article:

"First in a list of four main risk factors was "increasing demand for animal protein," which is a way of saying that demand for meat, eggs, and dairy is a "primary factor" influencing emerging zoonotic diseases. This demand for animal products, the report continues, leads to "changes in farming practices." Lest we have any confusion about the "changes" that are relevant, poultry factory farms are singled out."

"Perhaps in the back of our minds we already understand, without all the science, that something terribly wrong is happening."

"We perhaps know more than we care to admit, keeping it down in the dark places of our memory -- disavowed."

"In the United States, about 3 million pounds of antibiotics are given to humans each year, but a whopping 17.8 million pounds are fed to livestock -- at least, that is what the industry claims. The Union of Concerned Scientists estimated that the industry underreported its antibiotic use by at least 40 percent. "

"Why aren't more people aware of, and angry about, the rates of avoidable food-borne illness?"

I think people feel personally-attacked when those that don't eat animals are infected by those that spread diseases by animal consumption, and so the tolerance eventually breaks and those that don't eat animals strike back in order to regain a healthier ground. They strike back before there is no optional left to gain a healthier ground. They don't want another super-bug just because meat eaters rather go through a fast food instead of out into the woods.


reply posted on 11-11-2009 @ 03:01 PM by Avarus
reply to post by dzonatas



You're right dzonatas, the thread got derailed. It's not about animal rights or the love of eating animal carcasses, it's really about laziness.

I'm a vegetarian exactly because of this societal problem. We consume too much meat, so much that corners are cut to keep up with demand. Whether you believe it's natural for us to eat meat or not, one thing is clear, cold hard cash drives the industry, not healthy choices for consumers.

In the end, people do whatever they want, but I would recommend stop feeding 'the beast'. Go get some local farm raised beef or hunt for rabbit. McDonald's has enough of our money.


reply posted on 12-11-2009 @ 06:39 AM by Epipactis
reply to post by Rawhemp


I see this thread has moved along a fair bit since last I looked but before I get round to reading it through, I thought I should address this fruity concern, to a perceived degree.

First I should say that I consider vegans to be highly moral people with ethical concerns, but I don't agree with their position in these moral matters.

Some of the Jains of India carry a brush with which to brush the ground before them, that they should not inadvertently step on an ant or other such small invertebrate, and accidently kill it. Other Jains wear face masks that they do not breath in microbial aerial organisms and thereby kill them.
On that basis I should stop showering regularly and washing the streptococcal bacteria who I host on my skin, down the plug hole, where they could perish.
Where up the chain of being do you say to yourself it is forbidden to kill another biological entity?
Ultimately I would apply that rule only to my own species, although I would try to respect all others as being part and parcel of the great chain of evolving being that is the Earth Biosphere: Ngaigaia: Ngai is the Masai Earth Mother Goddess, as is Gaia the Greek Earth Mother Goddess:
Combining the two has a pleasing poetic ring to my ears as well as being pleasing to my own individual metaphysical sense & sensibilty, so I would ask your indulgence there:
I should add here that whilst I believe it wrong to kill one of your own kind, if under attack thereto, then everybody has a justified right to self defence:

Orang utans ~ meaning 'Gentlemen of the Jungle' in Malay, I read somewhere long ago ~ perhaps just a poetic fancy!
Because of the relative scarcity of fruit in the rain forests of Borneo and Sumatra, I understand that orangs find it necessary to live mostly solitary lives: Although in zoos where we provide them with all the fruit they need they seem happy to coexist side by side.

Another question that pops up into my head when thinking about vegans is a concern as to what the Esquimaux, as some Inuit are called, think about it. I'm sure that if the vegans of the world were to send the Esquimaux baskets of fruit to eat they would enjoy the gift. I also think that they would insist that they need to eat animal flesh & blubber, if they are to stoke up their metabolism to the degree necessary to survive sub zero temperatures for much of the year, in lands of little or no vegetation.

Polarised 'Good & Bad' in a Bonobo primate organism:
The bonobo primate is in behavior, and on the face of it, a saintly creature.
However, it has to be said that I find their rear ends to be something of an embarrassment to adjust one's gaze to.
In terms of polarities I would say that human primates learn to accomodate perceived metaphysical good & bad polarities within their up & down chakra system:
Where bonobo primates are concerned however, this perceived 'good & bad' polarisation is more visually evident seemingly. It is as if being such saitly creatures, all the 'bad' in the bonobo has retreated to the rear end.
If anybody wants an embodied visualisation of a perceptual biological 'devil' then look to the bonobo rear end for a quintessential representation thereto, perhaps:
Like Janus?
We all have what can be perceived to interpretation good & bad instinctual impulses that need accomodation & harnessing within society:

If we are, as I believe, evolving into a cosmic consciousness species of primate humanoid ape, then we require all the past knowledge and modes of understanding, philosophical, theological, scientific, that contribute towards the attainment of stellar plasma fusion generated neutrinosynthesiser 'Holy Ghost' interstellar quantum leaping cosmic consciousness:
I stress the words modes of understanding over a perception as to modes of behavior, within a given environment:
Vegan good?
Vogon good?
Pages: <<  16    17    18    19    20    21    22  >>    ^^TOP^^



The Church of HIV: Inventing the AIDS Virus
  Posted 6 days ago with 64 member flags
DIY lets cure cancer simple as that
  Posted 2 days ago with 19 member flags
5 Mainstream Diseases Respond to this drug ! - Breakthrough!
  Posted 19 days ago with 14 member flags
Why are dead people waking up around the world?
  Posted 5 days ago with 12 member flags
Dying For A Smile
  Posted 13 days ago with 11 member flags
Harvard To Be Tried for Alzheimer\'s Research Fraud
  Posted 6 days ago with 10 member flags