Originally posted by RANT
I'd agree, in any event, that in-tolerance exists on both sides of the aisle. Though I'd prefer to see Dems become LESS tolerant of the BIGOTS, RACISTS and RELIGIOUS INTOLERANTS on your side..
Lets use the libby "lesser of to evils" arguement to look at some issues:
Tolerance:
religious whack-jobs - Gays are bad, abortions bad, you're all going to hell.
environuts - You can't wear lether you monster! You can't drive that SUV! Yo ucan't use that evil ATV or sled on my mountain! You can't eat that! And, if you do your an evil racist bigot.
Lesser evil - cons
Taxes:
cons - It's your money spend it wisely.
libbys - Since you are to stupid to handle your own money, give it to me so I can spend it on things you don't like, and if you don't, your an evil racist bigot.
lesser evil - cons
Affirmitive action:
cons - If you work hard anything is posible.
libbys - If you work hard anything is posible, unless your a white male in which case you are already an evil racist biggot and deserve nothing.
(Now before you jump all over me I unerstand there are people in certain socio-economic classes that need a leg up, but this matter could and should be handled through targeted, privately funded scholarships.)
lesser evil - cons
I could go on and on, but you get the picture.
Originally posted by RANT
Scurry away now.
Kis my a$$
(EDIT - When I first posted, the quotes showed up but all my words disappeared. Is anyone else having this problem?)
[Edited on 5/20/04 by Seth Bullock]


