Originally posted by yeahright
reply to post by Fromabove
I've never seen his parentage seriously questioned. That would be all you'd need to verify to get the ball rolling on a genealogical study, isn't it?
Originally posted by genius/idoit
reply to post by Benevolent Heretic
That's a pretty cavalier attitude to that revelation don't you think? Have you traced your ancestry,are you related to all but one president?I have and I'm not and I traced my ancestry back to the battle of sterling.
Originally posted by genius/idoit
reply to post by Benevolent Heretic
That's a pretty cavalier attitude to that revelation don't you think? Have you traced your ancestry,are you related to all but one president?I have and I'm not and I traced my ancestry back to the battle of sterling.
Royal descent is common among residents of the United States, as in other countries. It has been estimated that probably as many as 150 million Americans (half of the population) have traceable royal European descent
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Originally posted by ClintK
Mathematically, this is not surprising.
Originally posted by liveandletlive
Being "related" and being related to a family that intermarried in order to keep the blood line "pure" are two different things!
And what evidence do you have that this has happened? I know it's a conspiracy site and this IS the Secret Societies forum, but we still need to use logic and reason... don't we? Evidence... facts... ring a bell?
Originally posted by liveandletlive
So how many people here on ATS are members of the Royal blood line?
Probably quite a few. As I said, my husband is related to James Buchanan (by blood) but many people (I would guess most) haven't had a genealogy chart done.
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
I have said it time and time again but anyone who takes the time to read the Treaty of Paris that established the United States after the Revolutionary War and researches the words and titles used, and then can take honest note that the treaty is being dictated to us by the English King and what and how it is being dictated will likely conclude nothing was won in the Revolutionary War but the right to incoporate as a franchise.
In the opening Paragraph of the Treaty the King reserves the right to be the United States Prince Elector (a Holy Roman Empire Title meaning one has the power to appoint an emperor, prince or King for the Empire) and to also be our treasurer!
It is also pretty apparent when you read the treaty literally and thats how treaties are meant to be read as that is how they are written that the King's main power is not dirived from being the English King but by being a Prince of the Holy Roman Empire and Prince Elector of the Holy Roman Empire, and Arch Treasurer of the Holy Roman Empire.
This is the King's full title note the first, note the last.
It having pleased the Divine Providence to dispose the hearts of the most serene and most potent Prince George the Third, by the grace of God, king of Great Britain, France, and Ireland, defender of the faith, duke of Brunswick and Lunebourg, arch- treasurer and prince elector of the Holy Roman Empire etc., and of the United States of America
You can see how right in the treaty that he delcares himself to the prince elector of the United States (he choses who will be President, and that he is the arch-Treasurer of the United States, he controls our money.
This is a legal binding treaty by the way people.
While on the surface it appears through stories like the OP's post that it's England controlling us or ruling over us secretly, I contend that just as the title suggests all roads lead to Rome, and the English Monarch derives their power over us via Rome and the power that Rome gives them.
Most people disagree with me on this but I truly believe we are an incoproated state of the Roman Empire.
Treaty of Paris
"Akhenaten was not a visionary but rather a methodical rationalist. Akhenaten was a rational philosopher who took the throne of perhaps the most powerful empire on earth at that time, and implemented reforms one by one as soon as the necessary political conditions had been created. Akhenaten manipulated the power of the priestly institutions at his command very brilliantly. The new religion could be summed up as there is no god but Aten, and Akhenaten is his prophet. " - Jimmy Dunn
Akhenaten was the first head of state on the Earth to decree the concept of one God. Akhenaten called himself the Son of Aten, prefiguring the legend of Jesus.
Akhenaten also provoked a change in art. In the long history of Egyptian art, Pharaohs were generally presented as ideal figures, with athletic bodies and handsome faces. Portraits and statues made during Akhenaten's rule were much more realistic in style, often showing Akhenaten and Queen Nefertiti, Akhenaten's Chief Royal Wife, in intimate, affectionate poses or with their children, six daughters, on their laps. At times, Akhenaten is shown riding with Nefertiti in a chariot, kissing Nefertiti in public and with Nefertiti sitting on his knee. Akhenaten himself was portrayed with a long, narrow face, wide hips on a somewhat deformed body, a small potbelly, and unusually long fingers and toes.
The Heretic Akhenaten
