Stop Taking Genesis so Literally!, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 3 times


reply posted on 27-10-2009 @ 08:05 PM by SamsBoni
reply to post by Nosred



What about the part in Genesis where it says God created the Earth before the Sun. How could that be possible with what we know about how Solar Systems formed?



reply posted on 27-10-2009 @ 08:08 PM by halfoldman
reply to post by Nosred



What do you mean by Genesis? Genesis chapter 1 tells a wholly different tale than Genesis 2. In one we find creation similar to evolution, first fish, than land-animals, then all humans (male and female). In chapter two God first creates Adam, then the animals, and then only Eve from his rib. So the Bible starts with a major contradiction!


reply posted on 27-10-2009 @ 08:16 PM by SamsBoni
reply to post by halfoldman



I thught you wanted to be a priest,but you don't believe the Bible? I don't think they would care you are gay nearly as much as they would care that you don't believe the Bible. Not trying to insult, just to bring up the irony of someone who doesn't believe the bible wanting to be a priest.


reply posted on 29-10-2009 @ 02:54 PM by hotpinkurinalmint
reply to post by one_enlightened_mind



What are the extra-biblical sources you speak of? Are they sources that existed thousands of years ago that the first people to hear the bible would be familiar with? Or do these sources originate several centuries later in Europe or the USA.

Archaeology suggests that many of the Bible's stories, especially the ones that appear in the early parts of Genesis, were borrowed from legends that existed in the Ancient Near East. Characters like Noah, Adam, and Eve appear in Messopotamian legends.

This is not to say that the authors of the Bible were somehow dishonest or plagiarists. The original audience of the Bible was aware of the older legends. To them, Genesis (or early version(s) of Genesis) were not the first time they heard of Noah or Adam and Eve.

Genesis was nevertheless novel to these original audiences because it put a new spin on what were very old stories. No longer was the creation of the world, as was understood at that time, governed by multiple gods, but rather only one God created the world. No longer was the world governed by gods who allowed anybody to do as they pleased and who themselves were morally suspect, but the world was now governed by a single god who demanded moral behavior.



reply posted on 30-10-2009 @ 02:48 PM by gaiscíoch
The sun does not make night and day.

The rotation of the earth on its axis creates night and day.

You can create "light" without creating "night and day".

First God made heaven & earth 2 The earth was without form and void, and darkness was upon the face of the deep; and the Spirit of God was moving over the face of the waters. 3 And God said, "Let there be light"; and there was light. 4 And God saw that the light was good; and God separated the light from the darkness. 5 God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And there was evening and there was morning, one day.


Its important to not lose scientific reasoning when reading the Bible.

There is no room for a "gap theory" in which God took 7 million years to create the earth.

It says god seperated the light from the darkness and called them night and day. That's a 24 hour period.

Science and religion went hand in hand way back when. Then it all went array like Israel and Palestine.


This is the part that boggles me about atheist scientist.

They believe intelligent life came about on our planet because of chance. The circumstances and sequences of events involving earth where just right to harbor the formation of the first living organisms and then evolution led to more advanced organisms.

Which means they have to believe its possible for life to have formed in other places of the universe. Which means as an atheist you have to believe in the potential for "aliens".

If you have to believe in the potential for aliens you have to believe in the potential for alien life forms that are far older, more advanced or even powerful than the human race. What kind of arrogance would lead to someone thinking that just because they are human means humans are the most advanced beings in the universe?

If you believe in the potential of more advanced and/or more powerful beings in our universe then you believe in the potential for a creator and a "God" type being.

Because what is a "god" if not a super advanced alien life form?

The problem with most atheist scientist is that they cannot seperate Hollywood and fairytales from scientific logic.

They believe if its been made into a Hollywood movie or been handed down from generation to generation as "folklore" then its "fantasy" and thus cannot be a approached from a scientific point of few.

This lack of an ability to let go of this predetermined bias as to what is "scientific" and what is not is the very root of the conflict between "religion" and science.




[edit on 30-10-2009 by gaiscíoch]


reply posted on 31-10-2009 @ 01:31 AM by The Matrix Traveller
reply to post by one_enlightened_mind



hmmmm I do like what you said....

Species must change and adapt or die


I guess we haven't adapted yet ????

I must bring this to peoples attention, especially those who have read the bible...

But what about Man???

Acording to the bible.....

That was said to be, that MAN was Created in the Image of God ???

Not A'Dam....

It is Not written anywhwere that "A'Dam" was Created in the Image of God.

It is only an asumption by the one reading the bible..

I repeat: It says that "MAN" was Created in the Image of God.

It doesn't say A'Dam was Created in the Image of God....

You talk only of the Dead.

A'Dam and his descendants and Not the Living one called MAN !

It is written in The Gospel of Thomas.

Quote;
56.
Jesus said,

“Whoever has come
to understand
the World,
has found only
a corpse,
and whoever
has found
a corpse,
is superior
to the World.”



The Descendants of A'Dam have coveted the title of MAN!

A'Dam is the human Species or Primate, but MAN is the title given to the Soul and Not A'Dam.

It is written in The Gospel of Thomas (as I have said before)...
Quote;

39.
Jesus said,

“The Pharisees
and the Scribes
have taken
The Keys of Knowledge
and Hidden Them.

They themselves
have NOT entered,
nor have they allowed
to enter
those who wish to.

You, however,
be as wise
as serpents
and as innocent
as doves.”


I guess the keys were taken by the Scribes and the religious leaders ???

And if we look at Genesis we find just such a happening, where all assume A'Dam is "MAN" because of what we are taught by the clergy.

But the One, they refer to as The saviour, is the "Son of MAN" and Not the "Son of A'Dam" or that mater any descendant of A'Dam.

It is Written in The Gospel According to John, Ch. 3 V. 13...

Quote;
13.
"No one
hath ascended
into heaven,
save He
that came down
from Heaven,
that is,
the Son of Man
who is in Heaven
"


So this is where it tells You that MAN is in Heaven and Not on Earth as the Descendants of A'Dam are.

Man can Not ascend into Heaven because he is already in Heaven, but the Descendants of A'Dam or human species primates or whatever, walk on the Earth and can't ascend!

[edit on 31-10-2009 by The Matrix Traveller]


reply posted on 1-11-2009 @ 12:34 PM by halfoldman
Originally posted by SamsBoni
reply to
post by halfoldman



I thught you wanted to be a priest,but you don't believe the Bible? I don't think they would care you are gay nearly as much as they would care that you don't believe the Bible. Not trying to insult, just to bring up the irony of someone who doesn't believe the bible wanting to be a priest.


I am simply raising questions, and I have heard personally about people who wrote on Genesis 1/2 in seminary training. I am here to ask questions and hear various opinions. I pointed out an obvious problem in the Bible: what is your explanation?
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^



EVOLUTION - Did YOU Know?
  Posted 16 days ago with 24 member flags
"I was raised an atheist"- Professor František Vyskočil
  Posted 6 days ago with 6 member flags
Evolution. Not a theory, but a fact!
  Posted 18 days ago with 4 member flags
Evolutionary theory: Gaps and not yet understood phenonemon
  Posted 18 days ago with 3 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Stop Bashing Us Military Folks.
  Rant, Posted 15 hours ago, 184 replies
Anonymous hacks CIA
  Breaking Alternative News, Posted 10 hours ago, 99 replies
Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 6 hours ago, 67 replies