The question of the Moon being barren and empty is far from the truth there is much to find up there and you can either see these things or not , some choose to ignore the facts and live quite happily in ignorance but the fact is that the moon is inhabited or was , I go with the former is as I discovered an anomoly on one of the more recent images from the Japanese space project and I will now try to up load some images to back my self up

I finally converted the high-resolution images from the Terrain Camera to a common format, but as they are too big I cannot post them on ATS Media, I will post a link to them tomorrow.

For now I can only say that they are much more interesting than I was expecting.

Im not sure what to make of it but there are some interesting features in this picture, I cleaned it up abit and tried to bring the features out using photoshop.

It looks interesting because there is some organisation in the pattern of rock or whatever that is. Although if you look at the original you will notice some of the sections in that area are sliced diagonally and slightly moved over, interesting indeed, actually you can see it in this shot also. The circle areas could be impact craters, im not sure, it makes sense because the moon is riddled with craters, but some of those lines look rather well organised.



[edit on 6-11-2009 by Nizzmo]

Originally posted by Imagir
Definetively NOT PIXELLATION!

Follow the shadows, from different perspectives...

is this a joke or what?
WHAT ELSE THAN HEAVY PIXELATION IS THIS? you CLEARLY can see this ,the pixelation structures are from left to right..


[edit on 7-11-2009 by anti72]

Originally posted by Imagir
The "large image" is cutted/snipped. There are many doubled images of the same area.

I don't understand what you mean, but the photos have two vertical "cuts" in which we can see that the image is slightly repeated.

I could have tried to join those pieces together, but I thought I should leave them as they are, specially because in one of the photos the "cuts" are not exactly vertical, so it would be difficult to do a good job.

Originally posted by ArMaP

Originally posted by Imagir
The "large image" is cutted/snipped. There are many doubled images of the same area.

I don't understand what you mean, but the photos have two vertical "cuts" in which we can see that the image is slightly repeated.

I could have tried to join those pieces together, but I thought I should leave them as they are, specially because in one of the photos the "cuts" are not exactly vertical, so it would be difficult to do a good job.

Actually it's better to leave it the way it is! I have read reports of so-called "image tampering" when NASA tried to paste overlapping parts of imagery together. Then you see artifacts where things don't line up quite right where they cropped the overlapping images to fit. So let's avoid that.

No photographic representation of a curved surface will have all the edges mate up perfectly where they overlap, unless perhaps the surface is concave, but in the case of the moon the surface is convex so they won't line up.

By the way, I couldn't download the originals in Firefox even after allowing script after script, seems like when I allowed scripts even more scripts popped up, so my PC downloaded a lot of stuff but none if it was the original image. But I finally tried it on Internet Explorer and it downloaded the original, which looks fantastic!!!

Thanks very much for sharing these ArMaP!!!

The naysayers who constantly scream the nonsense should be ignored. There is MASSIVE, compelling and profuse amounts of proof that not only is there vast artifacts on the moon, but that NASA has used obscuring technology for years and still does. The extent to which the Japanese have been corrupted by the Americans into allowing cover up computer obscuring is unknown.

The Skipper site is a wonderful resource and those who cannot see the obvious cannot because they cannot accept such a reality. No matter what proof you showed them, no matter how clear, no matter how much, they would still claim that it is all somehow just rocks and accidents of nature.

It is like the people who accept the official 9-11 story....they are the type that also denies alien life and a living moon, because their intellects are limited...and people with limited intellects always manage to show their ignorance by making silly claims that cannot be backed up.

Look up MOON BANDING and see a perfect example of how a few blind posters can miss an obvious feature that proves the moon is or has been occupied and is an engineered structure. On the Skipper site he shows the the bands are NOT film strip edges...there are examples of those shown and they are totally different...but still the naysayers insist that all the evidence, right angles and long constructed lines that alternate every other one in obvious pattern..is all just the edges of the film strips!!

No matter how many examples you show them that prove that film strip edges do NOT create the alternating and massive banding shown clearly..no matter how much...they still will insist that our eyes are lying ajnd to trust them...unreal.

Same thing here....no matter what evidence is brought, a few naysayers will always deny and deny and deny...because to accept the facts would challenge them beyond their comfort zone intellectually, and that they avoid at all costs.

Originally posted by richierich
and people with limited intellects always manage to show their ignorance by making silly claims that cannot be backed up.

Yes, that's a great truth.

---

I already downloaded the images that show the west side of Tycho and I am converting them now, stay tuned, even if it's only to see some amazing "computer obscuring" at work.

Here is what I believe is a Face in Tycho crater. It also appears in the Jaxa/Selene image. Hopefully the image will embed not just the link...

Here are two more of what I believe are structures in Tycho. The first image shows geometry not randomness... IMO. The second image is a close up of that same area.


[

[edit on 7-11-2009 by dennisdvx]

Oops... forgot to copy the second image

This is not pixelation. It looks like some sort of vehicle or machine. Notice the tracks alongside. This thing is 485' long


[edit on 7-11-2009 by dennisdvx]

[edit on 7-11-2009 by dennisdvx]