David Ray Griffin, pillar of the 9/11 Truth Movement, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 2 times


reply posted on 2-11-2009 @ 05:42 PM by mmiichael
Originally posted by tezzajw
Originally posted by mmiichael
99.99% of all recorded historical events do not have video footage.

Please prove this.

Originally posted by mmiichael
In the case the Pentagon attack there were witnesses at all stages from the minute the plane took off till it crashed at the Pentagon.

Please supply the names of the witnesses who observed the alleged Flight AA77, #N644AA while it was flying above 10,000 feet?

Please prove your statement: "One should keep in mind the destruction of the WTC and the Pentagon attacks are the most real time recorded and examined events in history. Thousands of ordinary people were there as witnesses, many with cameras, and provide accounts later."

Please show how the 9/11 attacks were recorded more than the recent Olympic Games opening ceremony, the recent Super Bowl, Obama's inauguration, etc... You made this claim, so please substantiate it.

Originally posted by mmiichael
I am calling you a troll, repeatedly haranguing rather than dealing with issues in a straightforward manner. This behaviour has been seen on other threads.
Just stop.

Yes, yes, yes... enough of the off-topic nonsense, mmiichael.

Just prove the claims that you've made and all will be well for you.



I am calling you a troll again. You repeat the same questions to answers given. As I have said repeatedly, newsworthy events that were reported extensively do not require links to articles, websites, videos as proof. WWII happened, as did Katrina, as today's sunrise. I can refer to them, I don't have to prove them.

A quick keying in to Google on the Pentagon attack will bring up tens of thousands of published article. If you are incapable of doing a fundamental search then you shouldn't be on a board like this.

Try to show some self-respect.


M


[edit on 2-11-2009 by mmiichael]


reply posted on 2-11-2009 @ 05:53 PM by tezzajw
Originally posted by mmiichael
I am calling you a troll again. You repeat the same questions to answers given.

But you have provided no answers, mmiichael.

You made your claim without any further follow-up proof.

Here again is your claim:
Originally posted by mmiichael
One should keep in mind the destruction of the WTC and the Pentagon attacks are the most real time recorded and examined events in history. Thousands of ordinary people were there as witnesses, many with cameras, and provide accounts later.


You have not shown me how this is true. You have not shown me how 9/11 was recorded more than the Olympic Games Opening Ceremony, the Super Bowl, Obama's Inauguration. All of the events that I have listed have a minimum of nearly a hundred thousand live eyewitnesses. Many of those eyewitnesses would have had cameras, as they were expecting to see the event that they were attending.

You have failed to support your claim.

Originally posted by mmiichael
A quick keying in to Google on the Pentagon attack will bring up tens of thousands of published article. If you are incapable of doing a fundamental search then you shouldn't be on a board like this.

Is this the extent of your attempt to prove your claim? Are you serious? You claimed that 9/11 was the most recorded event in history and you're trying to prove it using a Google search???

Please, mmiichael, I suggest that you concentrate on making claims about what you can prove instead of relying upon your anonymous Twitter, Blog and Google sources.

Here's a comparison for you:
I Googled up Pentagon Attack and got 1,120,000 matches.
I Googled up Olympic Games and got 22,200,000 matches.
I Googled up Super Bowl and got 37,800,000 matches.

Please, mmiichael, prove your claim about 9/11 being the most recorded event in history.

[edit on 2-11-2009 by tezzajw]


reply posted on 2-11-2009 @ 07:19 PM by mromano
www.youtube.com...

Above is a video of a very popular Russian clairvoyant predicting a terrorist attack on the USA in the later half of 2009. We have two more months here. I don't know if I believe it but it makes me ponder none the less.

Another odd thing I've been thinking about is 2012, supposedly the apocalypse of the new world, and how it falls in line with the next presidential election for the USA.

I've been watching some of the Nostradamus Files on history, and according to the show, it will not be the end of the world, but the end of this age, and the beginning of the new one. This is marked by earth falling under a certain constellation.

I forget what constellation we are under currently, but I know it started supposedly at the time of the birth of Jesus Christ. Certainly we can say these last 2000 years have been the time of the Christian. Rome, Great Britain, France, Spain, and of course the USA have all been the leading nations, all of them Christian states, but what is more deep than the religion of Christianity is the people behind it, the Caucasian. You can not deny white people have been the kings for the last two millenniums.

However, come 2012 we are no longer the leaders of the new world. Smarter, more advanced, craftier beings have began to take momentum, one that is about to peak. These beings are the Asians, in particular, China. People don't like to say it but some races are smarter than others, and the smartest of all are Asians. China needs America to maintain power, but not as badly as we need them. Their restrictive, communistic, and conservative lifestyles and values are viewed as barbaric in the Western world, but we can not deny this makes for a stronger and superior society.

Thats why we in America are beginning to adapt the behaviors of the Asian people and government. Our govt. wants to ration health care, spy on us through the patriot act, take over the banks and massive industries. I am not saying this is a bad thing, but people look to leaders to guide them, and our leaders look to better leaders and learn from them.


reply posted on 2-11-2009 @ 07:30 PM by ufoptics
reply to post by GoodOlDave


Sorry, had to chime in on this one.......

First, your omitting the fact the building was designed to withstand an impact from a airliner type craft, because of the Empire State Building accident in the 40's.

Second & Third, Temperature, Temperature.....Still not hot enough no matter what was burning.

Fourth, WOW....Blacksmith's are called in as Forensic Expert Witnesses. Now that closes the case!

Fifth, Yeah... your so right and at near free fall speed and no one knew it's weakness, please.....

Come on, your grasping at all the lame excuses the commission did in their report. When you find different material other then the same old same old, let me know.


reply posted on 3-11-2009 @ 05:12 AM by ipsedixit
Originally posted by mmiichael
The Vietnam war was on broadcast television and radio, newspapers and magazines. Photographers had to be flown in and housed.


Yeah . . . right so far.

Marginal interest as news in most of the other parts of the world.


Are you writing in a drug induced stupor?

No Internet, little video, few on site witnesses. No great magnet for discussion and analysis.


Man oh man! Dude, you should edit these comments out. Try to get them off the web. Anybody reading this stuff is never going to take anything you say say seriously again.

One has to understand the saturation level of media coverage with modern technology. More photographs and video frame pictures in a day now than in all the 20th Century.


One has to understand the way the media is controlled today and the way it is limited. Having the tools to do saturation coverage means nothing if there is no will to use it, or worse, if there is a will to pervert the truth and skew the impression the public gets of events.

Geometrically greater level of public and amateur input.


The course of the Vietnam war was altered by omnipresent media coverage of it. Everyday America got its dose of burning peasant huts, shot up, triaged marines, and riots in the streets on television.

It was the first war to receive such massive coverage. The course of the war was even altered by the coverage. Never again were journalists allowed the sort of front line access that they had in Vietnam. The coverage of Iraq is nothing to compare with the coverage of Vietnam. The only improvement would be in digital movie cameras carried by the soldiers in Iraq.

I doubt many can provide a chronology or highlights of the Vietnam war. itself an extension of the now forgotten Korean and Indo-China conflicts.


You can bet they know about it at West Point. "How to Lose a War 101". And a big part of that course would be the dangers of the kind of media exposure given to a dirty war by a completely unfettered press.

And you say you were a journalist covering that war? I flat out don't believe it.

Here's a sampler from Michael Maclear and Peter Arnet's "Vietnam: The Ten Thousand Day War". 65 video clips tell the whole story.





[edit on 3-11-2009 by ipsedixit]



reply posted on 3-11-2009 @ 08:53 AM by mmiichael
Originally posted by ipsedixit

One has to understand the way the media is controlled today and the way it is limited. Having the tools to do saturation coverage means nothing if there is no will to use it, or worse, if there is a will to pervert the truth and skew the impression the public gets of events.



Y'know I don't want to have a debate on the impact of Viet Nam in this particular thread or provide my credentials. If you knew what I do for a living now you'd understand. You can drop me a U2U.

I think there's a bit of confusion by your response. What I said was that 9/11 was the most thoroughly and real time documented event in history. Cameras running, people interviewed, every news station in the world covering it as it happened. Endless detailed articles, books, in every corner of the world.

Note on this forum easily a thousand long threads literally debating what was found in the debris, timing building collapses, etc. How many threads on Viet Nam are there? How many people can knowledgeably talk about the My Lai Massacre or know who William Calley was? Historically significant and of course the first war covered extensively on American television. But sadly a protracted brutally ugly conflict with no real beginning or end.

9/11 was a singular event and iconic. Maybe the first time 3-4 billion people were watching something occuring the very same day. A singular turning point that happened within a few hours. Much of the documentation comes from the general public.

Can anyone provide a date, a place, a name that is instantly recognizable and emblematic for Viet Nam?


M


[edit on 3-11-2009 by mmiichael]


reply posted on 3-11-2009 @ 11:10 AM by GoodOlDave
Originally posted by ipsedixit
GoodOlDave on the other hand seems to be advocating re-education camps on the Communist Chinese model, complete with running-dog, free thinking 9/11 truthers wearing dunce caps with slogans painted on them, being subjected to harangues by the "politically correct".


My, don't *we* embellish! I have been saying from day one that I don't think the truthers are stupid, as I know full well they are not, so if you're claimign this is my point, then you're lying.

My point was that the truthers are being taken in by these damned fool conspiracy web sites becuase they simply accept whatever rubbish they read there, without even a microbe of critical analysis. Let's face it, it ain't critical analysis that's coming up with these goofball claims of hologram planes and nukes in the basement. I find this to be an intellectually dishonest double standard becuase we all know these are the same people who analyze every nut, bolt, and door hinge relevent to the (as you call it) the official story with an electron microscope.

Tell me something, in all honesty- when I say that the conspiracy people are making mountains out of molehills and chasing shadows to instigate false paranoia in people, how does your post of "my wanting to put people into re-education camps" disprove the point, exactly? I'm trying to discuss a legitimate point while you are running around screaming that some boogey man is out to get you.

I think we should just air out the issues thoroughly, press charges where it is warranted and let the people, after proper exposure to the allegations and the rebuttles, make up their own minds.


I absolutely, positively agree. However, we need to perform REAL investigations, such as how we failed miserably in estimating what Iraq really was up to and how it led to this pointless war. It is a gargantuan waste of time to be investigating idiotic five degrees of separation Kevin Bacon games linking Bush to Hitler via an irrelevent chain of a grandfather who knew someone working for someone who knew someone who worked for someone who once knew Hitler.

The problem for you is, ridiculous innuendo exactly like this is what makes up the bulk of the truther's "proof" that there was an inside job to begin with.


reply posted on 3-11-2009 @ 11:52 AM by GoodOlDave
Originally posted by ufoptics
First, your omitting the fact the building was designed to withstand an impact from a airliner type craft, because of the Empire State Building accident in the 40's.


So who's saying the towers *didn't* withstand the impact of the aircraft. We all saw with our own eyes that the towers remained standing for some time, after the plane impacts. It wasn't the damage from the impact themselves that brought the towers down, it was the chain reaction of events the impacts caused.

Second & Third, Temperature, Temperature.....Still not hot enough no matter what was burning.


NYPD helicopter pilots flying eye level to the impact areas reported that the support girders were glowing red from the fires and appeared like they were about to collapse, and about 1/2 hour later, they did. Eyewitness accounts do not support your educated guess.

Fourth, WOW....Blacksmith's are called in as Forensic Expert Witnesses. Now that closes the case!


I don't have to tell you that it's your side, not ours, who's consistently introducing false claims that the steel melted from the fires. I mentioned blacksmithing as a physical example that steel does not need to reach temperatures of actual melting point melt before losing its structural integrity. Do you doubt that statement?

Come on, your grasping at all the lame excuses the commission did in their report. When you find different material other then the same old same old, let me know.


Go back and reread what you just posted. Nowhere in the commission report did they ever address the reasons for why the towers collapsed. It was meant to document who committed the attack and how they did it, not to document the physical process of the collapse. They left that to the specialists at NIST and FEMA. If your genuine intent is to learn the truth about the events of 9/11 then it would be your obligation to know this before you started posting on this topic.

However, if you still insist on more material, I myself subscribe to the report written by MIT materials engineer Thomas Eagar, who lays out his own diagnosis for why the towers collapsed. I absolutely positively guarantee that those damned fool conspiracy web sites you get all your information from won't be showing you this-

MIT engineering report for the WTC collapse

I have yet to encounter ONE person who could ever explain why this material is wrong. Perhaps you can be the first.

[edit on 3-11-2009 by GoodOlDave]
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



9-11 lecture at Basel University, Switzerland.
  Posted 13 days ago with 14 member flags
9/11 Actors re-visited
  Posted 6 days ago with 12 member flags
Wikipedia categorizes 9/11 truth as \'denialism\'
  Posted 17 days ago with 11 member flags
Building Collapses in Rio
  Posted 14 days ago with 6 member flags
new film "Human the film (2012)" covers all the bases and more!
  Posted 8 days ago with 6 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Stop Bashing Us Military Folks.
  Rant, Posted 15 hours ago, 185 replies
Anonymous hacks CIA
  Breaking Alternative News, Posted 10 hours ago, 101 replies
Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 6 hours ago, 70 replies