Survival of the Fattest: Man Is Still Evolving, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 1 times


reply posted on 27-10-2009 @ 11:40 PM by Alien Mind
reply to post by bettermakings



Men think with 2 heads, so the fat/obese woman must have a REALLY good personality to make up for her looks if she is to attract an honest good-looking man. Even then, a thinner woman with a similar personality might steal him away.

It's the truth. Sorry if it's offensive


I assume you met every single on this planet to stand there and say all men think with 2 heads? Until you met every guy on this planet then i don't think you have the right to say that. People like you is the reason why hate exist.



reply posted on 28-10-2009 @ 12:02 AM by Flighty
reply to post by bettermakings



In the majority of cases, it might scare you to know, that women put on weight AFTER marriage and AFTER having kids.
That skinny/thin/slim girlfriend/wife who you have now, may well be overweight when she's in her 30s.40s, or 50s.
What are you going to do, divorce her?
Some people here should watch Shallow Hal and learn a few lessons.

Also, not ALL overweight females are single and out looking for a bloke.
They are married with kids and married to men who remember them from their slim and therefore, in your opinion, beautiful days.

Are these men bottom feeders? No, they are wonderful men who stand by their women and love them regardless.

By the way, there is a thread here on ATS about a woman who is obese who is having 6 CHILDREN, including a NEWBORN BABY, taken away from her because she's obese.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

So I guess that shoots down the OBESE WOMEN AREN'T FERTILE nonsense.

If people are going to DENY IGNORANCE it might help if they quit the stereotypes and educate themselves.

In fact, if you look around with an open mind, you'll find there aren't too many single overweight women around. Most that I know are either married or in long term relationships.


reply posted on 28-10-2009 @ 03:08 PM by ANOK
reply to post by bettermakings



Yeah sry but you're being very bias against men, but having said that you're probably right to a point. I personally don't like fat, not fat people, but fat.
I also know lots of women who have the same bias against skinny men, of which I am one, as well as fat men. So it goes both ways, but because the media focuses on the weight problem (because it's a HUGE financial market), and the standards of males, no one pays attention the other side of the coin. There's no money to be made off of skinny people. Women are just as biased about body size as men are, in fact I'd say more so, because as you said men have no standards...
If I could find a hotty blond with no standards I'd be happy...

BTW is there some kind of rule that says I have to like anybody?

[edit on 10/28/2009 by ANOK]


reply posted on 29-10-2009 @ 04:04 AM by oozyism
reply to post by Alien Mind



I thought evolving meant from one specy to another, I still haven't seen that. I would love to see humans orchestrate evolution. Concious evolution between species is what I'm after, not natural selection which from my understand only works within species. Hence black humans and white humans.


reply posted on 29-10-2009 @ 11:10 AM by Alien Mind
Originally posted by oozyism
reply to
post by Alien Mind



I thought evolving meant from one specy to another, I still haven't seen that. I would love to see humans orchestrate evolution. Concious evolution between species is what I'm after, not natural selection which from my understand only works within species. Hence black humans and white humans.


Its not like what you see in the movies, you don't wake up one day looking completely different.


reply posted on 29-10-2009 @ 11:05 PM by oozyism
Originally posted by Alien Mind
Originally posted by oozyism
reply to
post by Alien Mind



I thought evolving meant from one specy to another, I still haven't seen that. I would love to see humans orchestrate evolution. Concious evolution between species is what I'm after, not natural selection which from my understand only works within species. Hence black humans and white humans.


Its not like what you see in the movies, you don't wake up one day looking completely different.

No but there is something called reverse engineering, we know how evolution works so why can't we reproduce the results?



reply posted on 30-10-2009 @ 03:41 PM by ANOK
reply to post by oozyism



Because evolution takes billions of years?

Having said that though biologists can demonstrate evolution, and the historical evidence is overwhelming, but no one can give you an exact mechanism for evolution. But you need to learn what evolution is, in scientific terms, and what is still theory and what is facts.

A few words need to be said about the "theory of evolution," which most people take to mean the proposition that organisms have evolved from common ancestors. In everyday speech, "theory" often means a hypothesis or even a mere speculation. But in science, "theory" means "a statement of what are held to be the general laws, principles, or causes of something known or observed." as the Oxford English Dictionary defines it. The theory of evolution is a body of interconnected statements about natural selection and the other processes that are thought to cause evolution, just as the atomic theory of chemistry and the Newtonian theory of mechanics are bodies of statements that describe causes of chemical and physical phenomena. In contrast, the statement that organisms have descended with modifications from common ancestors--the historical reality of evolution--is not a theory. It is a fact, as fully as the fact of the earth's revolution about the sun. Like the heliocentric solar system, evolution began as a hypothesis, and achieved "facthood" as the evidence in its favor became so strong that no knowledgeable and unbiased person could deny its reality. No biologist today would think of submitting a paper entitled "New evidence for evolution;" it simply has not been an issue for a century.

- Douglas J. Futuyma, Evolutionary Biology, 2nd ed., 1986, Sinauer Associates, p. 15


Can't you except that evolution does not contradict the Bible? That there could have been an original creator who's creation then adapted and changed over time? C'mon the historical evidence is overwhelming. Just look at dinosaurs. BTW why would a god create dinosaurs, what would the point be in that? And why do people take a 2000 year old book written by men at face value, and literally, yet they refuse to listen to modern educated scientists, with 2000 years of knowledge over the Bible writers? Black and white thinking is ignorant and dangerous.
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



EVOLUTION - Did YOU Know?
  Posted 17 days ago with 24 member flags
"I was raised an atheist"- Professor František Vyskočil
  Posted 7 days ago with 6 member flags
Evolution. Not a theory, but a fact!
  Posted 19 days ago with 4 member flags
Evolutionary theory: Gaps and not yet understood phenonemon
  Posted 18 days ago with 3 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Hollow Earth Theory New Evidence.
  General Conspiracies, Posted 16 hours ago, 114 replies
Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 12 hours ago, 65 replies
I saw a cat turn into a bag..
  The Gray Area, Posted 16 hours ago, 42 replies