Has Obama being elected done more to divide the country?, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 3 times


reply posted on 26-10-2009 @ 10:22 PM by ThaLoccster
reply to post by Benevolent Heretic



Thanks for that article it was a good read.

Were a few points I thought stood out.

"The environment is much more extreme today because of the level of public involvement, the level of incivility among both the political elite and the public," said Chris Dolan, a political scientist at Lebanon Valley College in Annville, Pa.

"It is nasty and getting nastier," agreed Clyde Frazier, a political scientist at Meredith College in Raleigh, N.C.

While he believes that American history has seen dirtier political periods, Frazier sees today's climate partly the result of the "media culture."

"Vitriol seems to sell. If you are telling people the end of the world is at hand, they watch," he said.


While Americans once sought news from media outlets that aimed for objectivity, many are now turning to sources that reinforce their political viewpoints, including the conservative Fox News and the liberal MSNBC on cable television.


"Political animosity has become professionalized," said Frazier, mentioning talk radio's ultraconservative Rush Limbaugh, who openly calls for the failure of the Obama presidency.


[edit on 10/26/2009 by ThaLoccster]

[edit on 10/26/2009 by ThaLoccster]



reply posted on 26-10-2009 @ 10:59 PM by ThaLoccster
Originally posted by kozmo

Great idea!!! The 50% on the right can finally have a country where people take personal responsibility, work to improve themselves and provide for their families, can have family values, can have Christian values and demand accountability from each other - the other 50% can all sit around, smoke pot and share that one bag of Doritos that they'll manage to beg from someone with a job.

So my main question is... How are the liberal 50% going to survive when they can no longer pillage from the 50% that do any actual work!?


I find your comment close minded, offensive and outright idiotic.

Your painting of any liberal as a drug using, family abusing, welfare receiving devil worshipper just goes to show what good 'christian values' you have.

The people you just lumped together in some retarded melting pot of idiocy are the people that generally possess the larger portion of what you claim the people on the "right" possess.

I thought one of your "christian values" was "judge not lest ye be judged", not to mention "let he who is without sin cast the first stone". Way to point out the pompous, righteous attitude that the "right" carries around.

Comments like yours, are what helps to further divide America. If you want an America where everyone thinks the same as you (or else probably) then move to Iran. Its amazing how people with bigoted opinions such as yours despise a country like Iran, yet would fit in quite nicely. You can't truely want an America, or the freedoms it offers if you honestly believe the comment you just blurted out and I can't with a straight face call you an American, much less a patriot. A true American would work towards uniting his country, not making statements and fostering an attitude like yours.

Why don't you spend your free time with those less fortunate countrymen and women of yours, help them better theirselves so they won't need a system like welfare or your precious tax dollars. What would Jesus do, right?


reply posted on 27-10-2009 @ 07:44 AM by Benevolent Heretic
Originally posted by reasonable
The US is divided beyond repair. I firmly believe the country should divide into two separate countries a right leaning and a left leaning.


I actually disagree that separation is the answer. Live and let live is the answer. Learning to agree to disagree is the answer. Keeping our beliefs for ourselves and not imposing them on other people is the answer.

As kosmo illustrated:

One person's "murdering unborn children" is another's freedom of choice.
One person's "raping and pillaging the traditional nuclear family" is another's freedom to have the kind of family one chooses.
One person's "feminization of men and the masculinization of women" is another's gender equality.
One person's "denigrating the foundation of marriage" is another's freedom to marry one's choice.
One person's "handouts to people who are uninterested in providing for themselves" is another person's charity and love for our fellow man.

And so on.

It seems some people want freedom, as long as they get to choose the particular freedoms for everyone...

My point is, I accept that kosmo feels this way about the freedoms and equality that I support. As long as he/she doesn't impose his own personal restrictions on my freedoms, I don't have a problem with him feeling the way he does. But that's what he wants to do. He wants to take away my freedoms. He would legally remove every freedom he mentioned above if he had the power, and that's what I find dangerous about the more traditional side of the divide.

If kosmo could learn to LIVE AND LET LIVE, he would find that other people's freedoms don't affect his life. A gay couple down the street getting married won't in any way affect his marriage, yet he would disallow the gay couple the same rights he has. This is not personal responsibility. It's dictatorship, control, rule by one set of people to another.

Why people can't just back off of having control over everything and everyone, I don't understand. We have lived in this society together for many years. What's going on now that we feel we must rule the way other people live? That's the problem with this divide...


reply posted on 27-10-2009 @ 09:21 AM by kozmo
reply to post by ThaLoccster



Blah, blah, blah... Nice lecture...

How do you know what I do and don't with my free time? I feel no need to defend myself against your baseless implications - so I won't!

But you, sir, need to face reality. I am a Christian and espouse Christian values. But I am not here to debate what Jesus taught us versus the reality of the world we live in. I will simply expound upon those realities, which you see unfit to acknowledge.

The sad reality is that the vast majority of liberals receive hand-outs and EXPECT hand-outs. They vote for politicans who pander to them and promise them said hand-outs. The only thing welfare has accomplished is to create a complete and total sub-culture who has learned how to game the system to receive something for nothing. Whereas I believe there are genuinely needy people who require some help and should receive it, the vast majority are nothing more than life-long leaches!

Here is the problem with "Progressivism" aka Liberalism - there is no desire to ELEVATE the needy to provide for themselves and become more productive members of society. In fact, the very notion that they are "Needy" at all indicates a victim mentality that the liberals seek to remedy by PUNISHING those of us who work every day to improve our lot in life. So, you see, the whole notion of "Progressivism" is to SUPRESS the success of persons in order to level the playing field for those less motivated to be personally successful.

On a final note - looking for a government solution to the problem is worse than misguided - it has proven disasterous, not only to those it taxes into oblivion, but to those that it makes slaves to the cyclic system of hand-outs from the creation of a nanny-state.


reply posted on 27-10-2009 @ 09:36 AM by kozmo
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
One person's "murdering unborn children" is another's freedom of choice.
One person's "raping and pillaging the traditional nuclear family" is another's freedom to have the kind of family one chooses.
One person's "feminization of men and the masculinization of women" is another's gender equality.
One person's "denigrating the foundation of marriage" is another's freedom to marry one's choice.
One person's "handouts to people who are uninterested in providing for themselves" is another person's charity and love for our fellow man.

And so on.

It seems some people want freedom, as long as they get to choose the particular freedoms for everyone...

My point is, I accept that kosmo feels this way about the freedoms and equality that I support. As long as he/she doesn't impose his own personal restrictions on my freedoms, I don't have a problem with him feeling the way he does. But that's what he wants to do. He wants to take away my freedoms. He would legally remove every freedom he mentioned above if he had the power, and that's what I find dangerous about the more traditional side of the divide.

If kosmo could learn to LIVE AND LET LIVE, he would find that other people's freedoms don't affect his life. A gay couple down the street getting married won't in any way affect his marriage, yet he would disallow the gay couple the same rights he has. This is not personal responsibility. It's dictatorship, control, rule by one set of people to another.

Why people can't just back off of having control over everything and everyone, I don't understand. We have lived in this society together for many years. What's going on now that we feel we must rule the way other people live? That's the problem with this divide...


You are right to an extent, but only an extent. Look up Norms, Values and Mores and then tell me what the progressives are doing isn't burning a whole in the very fabric of society. There is a happy middle ground here, but the "Progressives" are not happy with compromise - they either want the institutions burnt directly to the ground or they want them burnt directly to the ground.

What you see as "Freedom of Choice" is MURDER. Perhaps I should be afforded the same freedom of choice to end anyone's life at any time of my own choosing!?

What you see as one's ability to have any type of family of their own choosing has ALWAYS been available in America - yet the "Progressives" feel a burning need to completely trash the traditional family and FORCE upon all of us the notion that the "family" is what THEY want to define it as - good luck with that!

"Gender Equality" is simply a means to an end of the aforementioned. It is a tactic and a ploy and has achieved only one thing - the destruction of the nuclear family!

Freedom to "Marry" whomever is another freedom in America - as long as the "Marriage" is between a man and a woman. I am fine with gays receiving the same legal benefits via "Civil Unions" but it ain't a marriage as it cannot be consumated nor can it produce offspring.

And handouts... that should be left to each individual. It should not be legislated nor should it require robinhood style politics like the left has been employing for decades. That is not "Charity"!

So you see, BH... the problem here is that the "Progressives" feel the need to trash every single Norm, Value and More that built this country. It is unreasonable to expect the majority of people to give up everything they believe and hold dear to them to appease a few radicals. The reality is that it is the PROGRESSIVES who want to dictate and control the total norms, values and mores of the entire country so that they can feel comfortable living outside of what the majority find societally acceptable.


reply posted on 27-10-2009 @ 10:06 AM by Benevolent Heretic
Originally posted by kozmo
You are right to an extent, but only an extent. Look up Norms, Values and Mores and then tell me what the progressives are doing isn't burning a whole in the very fabric of society. There is a happy middle ground here, but the "Progressives" are not happy with compromise - they either want the institutions burnt directly to the ground or they want them burnt directly to the ground.


I am not suggesting a compromise or that we should meet along the lines of "norms" or meet at a happy middle ground. People are different, with different values and beliefs. They should be allowed to have those beliefs and live their lives without someone imposing on their way of life and their beliefs.


What you see as "Freedom of Choice" is MURDER. Perhaps I should be afforded the same freedom of choice to end anyone's life at any time of my own choosing!?


If that's what you believe and want, then I suggest you try to get that pesky old law against murder taken off the books. You see freedom of choice as murder. That's fine. Don't have an abortion. But don't impose YOUR beliefs on everyone else. Many DO NOT see it the same as you. That's the part you're missing. You're incapable of accepting that those who disagree with you are right in their beliefs just as you are in yours.


What you see as one's ability to have any type of family of their own choosing has ALWAYS been available in America - yet the "Progressives" feel a burning need to completely trash the traditional family and FORCE upon all of us the notion that the "family" is what THEY want to define it as - good luck with that!


No one is forcing you to do anything... except maybe leave them alone. What you're saying doesn't make sense. HOW are progressives completely trashing the traditional family? Specifically. What are they forcing you to do? How does the gay marriage down the block with 2 adopted children ruin or even affect your marriage? BOTH can exist.


"Gender Equality" is simply a means to an end of the aforementioned. It is a tactic and a ploy and has achieved only one thing - the destruction of the nuclear family!


This is your belief and that's fine. But for us to "get along", you must also realize that I do not believe what you say or agree with you. I live in an equal marriage and we have a wonderful family. Many people do. Reality does not support your belief. The nuclear family is alive and well!


I am fine with gays receiving the same legal benefits via "Civil Unions" but it ain't a marriage as it cannot be consumated nor can it produce offspring.


My marriage (a man and a woman) cannot produce offspring.
Consummation


Consummation or consummation of a marriage, in many traditions and statutes of civil or religious law, is the first (or first officially credited) act of sexual intercourse between two people, following their marriage to each other.


Sexual Intercourse


Sexual intercourse, also known as copulation or coitus, commonly refers to the act in which the male reproductive organ enters the female reproductive tract.[1][2] The two entities may be of opposite sexes or not, or they may be hermaphroditic, as is the case with snails.


Now, I realize that your definitions of these words may be slightly different. But your rules don't apply to me or anyone else. That's the problem. You want YOUR rules, values, morals, definitions, beliefs and context to apply to all other people. And they don't.


It is unreasonable to expect the majority of people to give up everything they believe and hold dear to them to appease a few radicals.


I'm not asking you to give up ANYTHING except your need to totally control and dominate other people's lives.
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



Senator Paul is being detained at the Nashville Airport by the TSA
  Posted 18 days ago with 89 member flags
Bruins goalie Tim Thomas takes stand against U.S Government
  Posted 18 days ago with 88 member flags
This is what happens when Ford announces they are hiring
  Posted 19 days ago with 77 member flags
Romney: "I\'m Not Concerned About the Very Poor"
  Posted 9 days ago with 73 member flags
The Girl Killed by Obama: She "never saw it coming"
  Posted 3 days ago with 62 member flags
Ron Paul In Nevada - The Caucus Is Rigged!! - w/VIDEO
  Posted 5 days ago with 60 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Greetings from a Dying Man
  Introductions, Posted 11 hours ago, 116 replies
Alien Grey caught in photo ?
  Aliens and UFOs, Posted 13 hours ago, 70 replies
Pass Me My Rifle
  World War Three, Posted 17 hours ago, 58 replies
Stunning close view of Mercury
  Space Exploration, Posted 8 hours ago, 28 replies