David Icke's Information

reply to post by undo

---

Thnx for that. I still see HUGE leaps in judgement, how does anyone pickout what part of these traslations are real stories and which parts are myth? And how do we go from ancient myths to modern day reptilian agenda?

Ok, this is just how I feel about ICKE. I am a big fan of his.

Who does he talk to? I know he talked to this Zulu Shaman here:
www.metatech.org...

Very interesting read.

Thank you, Mr. Icke - I'd probably never in my life get to read the thoughts of a zulu shaman if not for you.

Shamanism is not something that is appreciated much in the US of A.
I personally appreciate it though.

>>Leaps in judgement, how do you get from here to there, ect.

I don't WORRY about it. If I want to read science, I will read a SCientifica American or Discover or Science News.

I myself understand a bit of what it is like to tread with one foot in each world - one the world of reality, the other the elusive world of dream and vision.

The dream and vision world often doesn't make LOGICAL sense. I don't think I will find an article in SCIENCE NEWS about the Queen of England being studied and being found to have reptile blood of an undetermind species.

I do think that it is an excellent metaphor though. It is a myth that speaks to me. To speak in terms of myths in a realistic sense does not make Mr. Icke a nutcase. Having had a schizophrenic break does not make Mr. Icke a lunatic. He has recovered his equilibrium very well. That's not easy to do when one finds oneself with a foot in another reality.

I like him. I listen to what he is saying, and not just his words. And I love the guy myself.

See, to me, that's the easy part. For instance, I KNOW the Queen of England is NOT like me on a very fundamental what makes us tick (reptilian brain of predation and measurement for strategy, vrs. I don't want us to starve or lose our house...) level.

It might be like in school - someone reads a poem and some students see ALL KINDS of stuff in it - even stuff maybe the author never even intended them to see. Other students struggle with it - they just never get how those words that don't even rhyme can be seen as something even remotely deep.

If you are a Christian, that's the myth you are comfortable with. You probably will never understand the depths of polytheism, or even be able to see that wow, it has depth and validity.

If you can't easily see the value in it, or the depth, maybe it isn't FOR you anyway. It will probably never be valid for you, and you will probably NEVER understand it. So why waste your time?

If it didn't SPEAK to me - I'd not waste my time on it.

reply to post by Snippy23

---

Seriously?! That's what you're leaving us with? [Please elaborate]

reply to post by hadriana

---

That really did not address me question. Saying that you are not like the queen of england therefore she is reptilian is again a HUGE leap.

I have always felt the need to aviod anything Icke supports, however some of what he talks about is interesting alot of it is too far fetched, and like the OP says where are these sorces? Everyone else is expected to back up their ideas and yet he remains his only source. So, I'm out on Icke, I may be wrong, but I've read quite a bit of his stuff and came out laughing. I also think even Alex jones strays away from some of Ickes ideas, and Jones is bad enough...

reply to post by eyesdown

---

I agree. The Icke fanboys only seem to respond with david says he is right anddavid is always right therefore he is right more or less.
"he talks to a lot of people" is the best so far.