David Icke's Information, page 2

reply to post by undo

---

Thnx for that. I still see HUGE leaps in judgement, how does anyone pickout what part of these traslations are real stories and which parts are myth? And how do we go from ancient myths to modern day reptilian agenda?

Ok, this is just how I feel about ICKE. I am a big fan of his.

Who does he talk to? I know he talked to this Zulu Shaman here:
www.metatech.org...

Very interesting read.

Thank you, Mr. Icke - I'd probably never in my life get to read the thoughts of a zulu shaman if not for you.

Shamanism is not something that is appreciated much in the US of A.
I personally appreciate it though.

>>Leaps in judgement, how do you get from here to there, ect.

I don't WORRY about it. If I want to read science, I will read a SCientifica American or Discover or Science News.

I myself understand a bit of what it is like to tread with one foot in each world - one the world of reality, the other the elusive world of dream and vision.

The dream and vision world often doesn't make LOGICAL sense. I don't think I will find an article in SCIENCE NEWS about the Queen of England being studied and being found to have reptile blood of an undetermind species.

I do think that it is an excellent metaphor though. It is a myth that speaks to me. To speak in terms of myths in a realistic sense does not make Mr. Icke a nutcase. Having had a schizophrenic break does not make Mr. Icke a lunatic. He has recovered his equilibrium very well. That's not easy to do when one finds oneself with a foot in another reality.

I like him. I listen to what he is saying, and not just his words. And I love the guy myself.

Originally posted by zaiger
reply to post by undo

---

Thnx for that. I still see HUGE leaps in judgement, how does anyone pickout what part of these traslations are real stories and which parts are myth? And how do we go from ancient myths to modern day reptilian agenda?

See, to me, that's the easy part. For instance, I KNOW the Queen of England is NOT like me on a very fundamental what makes us tick (reptilian brain of predation and measurement for strategy, vrs. I don't want us to starve or lose our house...) level.

It might be like in school - someone reads a poem and some students see ALL KINDS of stuff in it - even stuff maybe the author never even intended them to see. Other students struggle with it - they just never get how those words that don't even rhyme can be seen as something even remotely deep.

If you are a Christian, that's the myth you are comfortable with. You probably will never understand the depths of polytheism, or even be able to see that wow, it has depth and validity.

If you can't easily see the value in it, or the depth, maybe it isn't FOR you anyway. It will probably never be valid for you, and you will probably NEVER understand it. So why waste your time?

If it didn't SPEAK to me - I'd not waste my time on it.

reply to post by Snippy23

---

You may find that researching his sources - for example the many references in his books - takes a while, and leads you back down some odd trails to some odd people. What I've found so far suggests that some of the people he allows to use his site, and sometimes features in his books and lectures, may well be nastier and more dangerous than any alleged Illuminati or NWO.

Seriously?! That's what you're leaving us with? [Please elaborate]

reply to post by hadriana

---

That really did not address me question. Saying that you are not like the queen of england therefore she is reptilian is again a HUGE leap.

reply to post by eyesdown

---

I agree. The Icke fanboys only seem to respond with david says he is right anddavid is always right therefore he is right more or less.
"he talks to a lot of people" is the best so far.

I know that Jordan Maxwell is always complaining that David Icke lends a lot of his material from Maxwells research. So that would be one important source. Maxwell is complaining because Icke apparently never credits him.

Besides that, i think a lot of Ickes views are just common sense, but you have to start with asking the right questions. First of all.. is anyone trying to control us? If so, who is it, and why are they doing it? What is their ultimate goal. Nowadays you don't have to look much further than the proclamations of those controllers.. another good place to start is to read the books those people write.

You may be interested in the context in which Henry Kissinger refers to 'useless eaters', or maybe you could have a look into the PNAC documents.

Besides that, i think a lot of his ideas are the fruits of logical thinking. Start with questions like: what is the common thread found in all (exclusivistic) religions? Is the mass media hypnotizing people into a consensus reality? Once you find the answers, the rest follows from that. The next question is: Cui Bono? Who benefits from having people in a mental prison, policing themselves not to cross 'the line'?

Icke's sources are available to you too. It's just that Icke has done some of the work already, and presents the picture that emerges as a result of it.

[edit on 1-12-2009 by payt69]

reply to post by zaiger

---

I read somewhere (unfortunately did not safe the link) That Icke first started having his "knowledge" after a Ayahuasca experience. Which in my opinion will make all his claims colorful, but bogus...

reply to post by andy1033

---

Wheres your proof of being monitored since 1992?

A Theory of the Federal Reserve and Petrol Dollar Reserve
  Posted 14 days ago with 4 member flags

Art Bell. Somewhere in Time on NOW - This was a good show. Tune in!
  Posted 7 days ago with 1 member flags

Henrik Palmgren makes false claims re: global living
  Posted 6 days ago with 1 member flags

Santos Bonacci (astrotheology)
  Posted 4 days ago with 0 member flags

A few that blew the coup
  Posted 3 days ago with 0 member flags

Cubes, Everywhere in movies (symbolism)
  Posted 2 days ago with 0 member flags

i hear the low hum... but only inside?
  Posted 1 days ago with 0 member flags

When conspiracy theories lead to tied-up thinking.
  Posted 0 days ago with 0 member flags

Newest topics, updated in real-time:

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time: