Originally posted by kshaund
If she is cloned from Nefertiti, how is it her eyes are blue and not brown and her skin white...?
I think there are clones running around, but I haven't seen reason to think they're all clones?
Hi kshaund,
Good to see you in this thread. I cannot vouch for there actually being a single clone in existence in the universe. However, it appears that today
scientists are all saying that this technology is mature and that nothing prevents this from being done as we speak. Maybe they're wrong? Also,
maybe the most powerful people in the planet waited for you to be informed before even contemplating this possibility?
A nazi scientist who took refuge in the USA, Josef Mengele, had an obsession about changing people's eye color and did some nasty research into this
possibility over half a century ago. It seems to have panned out, notwithstanding the case of Mrs France. Recipient ovums may sometimes have an
incidence on aspects of an implanted clone, this is probably the main way of producing clones until relatively recently.
To demonstrate this possibility, take a look at any Tom Cruise movie before 1983 and those after his next release in 1986 and you will see that he
sure looks and acts similarly, only his eyes will never again be dark brown. Did he spend his 3 year sabbatical getting a green eye graft in the
third world? Or was the new Tom Cruise "grown" during that time by CIA Scientologists?
There may be a distinct possibility of putting clones into positions of power or of high media visibility and influence for a multitude of reasons.
Protecting lobby investments by instant replaceability is one, guaranteeing obedience is another, reducing issues of "conscience" one more, testing
advances in clone behavioral science yet another.
Are all powerful people clones? I'm not even convinced any are. But they sure seem to be. It certainly seems more likely than the competing
explanations involving holographic projections, mass hypnosis, alien impersonators or our own total delusion. Statistical repetition of genetic codes
is another possibility, but there would be little likelihood of anything but randomly spread repetitions of individual characteristics instead of a
grouping of similarities among a specific social class of world leaders, be they promoted to eminent positions by birth or by political parties
supporting their ascent.
In any case you skepticism is essential to contribute precious elements to demystifying what seems to be unusual similarities between power lineages,
some of them more recent and others sourcing their reference codes in our distant past. If we were able to establish once and for all that this is
all mere coincidence I would be the first to rejoice, as who likes to contemplate that anyone would be engineering our lives to such an extent?
What makes this prospect unlikely is that there have been numerous replacements of public figures in politics and elsewhere with doubles, some just
surgically modified actors and others who might be either identical twins kept in the sidelines or cloned substitutes. Our debate is important to
pursue even if some of our attributions of cloned origins are mistaken, because the object of discussion is that of important issues we must all
address with respect to the real identity of those who influence our lives.