Can anyone explain this 9/11 video?, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 4 times


reply posted on 25-10-2009 @ 09:35 PM by rainfall
reply to post by GrandKitaro777



The BBC read their script a little too early..

PEACE and LOVE...



reply posted on 25-10-2009 @ 10:40 PM by talisman
reply to post by Swampfox46_1999



There is an exception here. Modern Steel Skyscrapers don't usually (haven't really) collapse from fire.

ITs like the news coming on and saying, we just recieved word that the Moon had a very large explosion on it. 3 hours later, the Moon has a very large explosion on it. Now the example, is extreme, but obviously the more rare the event, when one predicts such or has news about such in advance it does raise eyebrows.


reply posted on 26-10-2009 @ 08:37 AM by thedman
reply to post by vip867



BBC later admitted that were quoting from Reuters report. Reuters
said got their story from a local media source who report WTC 7 as
collapsing, but quickly retracted it. Story was out by then

Confusion vs conspiracy....


reply posted on 26-10-2009 @ 10:23 AM by Swampfox46_1999
reply to post by talisman



No, that is not an exception. There are pages and pages of testimony from people on the scene that day, that they were sure that WTC7 was going to collapse long before it did. It wasnt a surprise to anyone.


reply posted on 26-10-2009 @ 10:33 AM by talisman
reply to post by Swampfox46_1999



Right, but if you look carefully, they were expecting a "partial collapse" in many cases.

So explain to me, how the news reported a full collapse as opposed to a partial one, so close to the actual time of collapse which is a very unlikely event.
go2.wordpress.com... ven.pdf

Also, it is possible to "seed" the idea to those who don't know otherwise.


reply posted on 26-10-2009 @ 01:43 PM by Swampfox46_1999
reply to post by talisman





So explain to me, how the news reported a full collapse as opposed to a partial one


I already did. You chose not to accept it.


reply posted on 26-10-2009 @ 01:59 PM by talisman
reply to post by Swampfox46_1999



But in light of the paper I cited, the explanations your giving indicate partial collapses in many cases. Which people expect with buildings that suffer major damage.

How about this.

There are tapes of people saying'..."see that building it will be coming down soon"...
Or "its blowin"

Or "keep your eye on that building, it will be coming down *soon*"

Its one thing to suggest what your suggesting, it is quite another thing to suggest that not only did people expect a collapse, they expected the approx-correct time of collapse as well!!

That is a very different matter.


reply posted on 26-10-2009 @ 02:27 PM by Swampfox46_1999
reply to post by talisman




Yeah..its easy to look back at an event and go "A-HA". Not one person said, "That building is coming down at 5:27" Soon, is not an exact estimation of an event. Soon...could be twenty minutes or six hours.


reply posted on 26-10-2009 @ 02:59 PM by talisman
reply to post by Swampfox46_1999





"That building is going to come down next"

How would anyone know, which building in such chaos is going to come down "next?"

I might as well start a thread on that very topic.




[edit on 26-10-2009 by talisman]


reply posted on 26-10-2009 @ 03:17 PM by micpsi
Originally posted by Swampfox46_1999
reply to
post by talisman



No, that is not an exception. There are pages and pages of testimony from people on the scene that day, that they were sure that WTC7 was going to collapse long before it did. It wasnt a surprise to anyone.


But it didn't collapse, did it? It was demolished.

And there are NOT pages and pages of reports of people saying thy were sure WTC7 was going to collapse. What there are are TV recordings of fire fighters and police, who conveyed to onlookers what they had been told concerning the building being soon to be blown up.

That's a little different from your misrepresentation.
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



9-11 lecture at Basel University, Switzerland.
  Posted 14 days ago with 14 member flags
9/11 Actors re-visited
  Posted 7 days ago with 13 member flags
Wikipedia categorizes 9/11 truth as \'denialism\'
  Posted 18 days ago with 11 member flags
Building Collapses in Rio
  Posted 14 days ago with 6 member flags
new film "Human the film (2012)" covers all the bases and more!
  Posted 8 days ago with 6 member flags
you must try this youre self ????
  Posted 14 days ago with 4 member flags

ATS Live North America is broadcasting in 57 minutes.
Today's Show: ATS Live: 96: Super powers, Falklands Woes, Stan Deyo Interview, Syria, Telepathy, The Devils Chord.