Originally posted by randyvs
Until the jackazz is gunned down by police after people reported a suspicious man casing Govt. buildings
That wasn't very funny because it wasn't logically correct.
Police don't just gun people down based on suspicion. They will approach the guy, restrain the guy for their safety, and then question him, and if
the police are still suspicious they will do further investigation.
Originally posted by Black47
How about we create away to even further burden our limited law enforcement.
How is investigating suspicious activity a burden on law enforcement? That is their job.... they are trained to do that.
I guess you never heard of
Neighborhood Watch?
Originally posted by Black47
Instead of finding away to feedi the 1 in 6 americans that go hungry with food that is NOT made in china.
There are free shelters for hungry people to go to. There is no excuse for that...
Originally posted by Black47
Who thinks of these things? Is this the stimulus creating jobs???
Neighborhood watch has been around for a very long time. It's common sense to get people aware about crime in their area, and to have them report it
to authorities.
Now that I think of it, Law Enforcement jobs would increase by demand if people start reporting more suspicious activity.
Originally posted by Seiko
reply to post by ALLis0NE
The importance here is who needs to know. What is need to know basis? Have we not the right to look up building plans, or draw our capitol buildings?
You can look up building plans, and draw the capitol buildings all you want, nobody is stopping you. However if authorities also find you buying
explosive making materials then you have a problem.
Authorities need to know if people are planning terrorist acts...
Originally posted by Seiko
The problem is the average person on the street isn't trained to differentiate, and this could lead to many dead ends and wasted time for our police
forces.
How do you suppose you fix that problem? You educate people on how to differentiate, and what to look for. That is the idea behind iWatch... it's to
educate people on activities to watch for, and to get them to be more aware of said activities.
Having police investigate suspicious activity is NOT wasted time.. that is their job.
Originally posted by Seiko
And people have been locked up without a court trial or proper investigation. There are people right now sitting in a prison in cuba who have no
evidence of wrongdoing against them.
Prove that to be true with local police like in LA and then we can talk...until then... how do you know those people in cuba have "no evidence of
wrongdoing" if they haven't been in court or investigated? I think you have been misled.
Originally posted by Seiko
In itself it seems likes a logical step in combating a force that is not wholly obvious. But what are the qualifications? The ad is too vague, and
doesn't discern between suspicious and actual threats to security.
I just posted a list of activities that iWatch teaches to look out for. Also that ad clearly states "let the authorities decided if it is a
threat".
iWatch is just for reporting tips, not actual crimes.
iWatch is just like
Neighborhood Watch, are you against that too?