Okay guys take it easy. No need for attacks. Just add your two cents and why you think that way. That is what this place is all about.
And now for my 2 cents...
Frankly I have always thought Hoagland seemed a little off, not just his theories, the way in which he asserts them.
Quite frankly everytime I look at his photos I really can't see crap. How they make shapes out of some of these blurs I don't get.
HOWEVER, that is my whole problem with the moon, the blurry black and white photos we have been spoon fed.
In 1976 we got full color panoramic pictures of mars. Still have none of the moon.
In 2008 the Japanese who build some of the best cameras on the planet sent a craft to the moon and posted "The first High Def pictures of the Moon"
and they sucked. These so called high def pictures were so far away and so blurry you could see nothing.
WHY????
Why can't we see some clear color pictures of the moon?
Does everyone here really believe that out of all those impact craters there are no colors on the moon? The many types of ejecta from so many
different elements and no color? Bull Crap!
It states on NASA's website that if you ask each astranaut what color the moon is you will get several differant answers. They admit to removing
colors from the photos.
Okay while looking for the address of the color removal on NASA's site I saw this pic, nothing unusual about the pic, except the quote under it
stating it is an unmanned crater. Why would they say that? See what I mean? Maybe they meant to say un-named, but NASA causes their own conspiracy
theories with these types of screw ups and inconsistancies.
www.nasa.gov...
But here is the link about color on the moon and them removing colors. This reads like a bunch of double talk. It is crap like this that makes people
not trust NASA.
history.nasa.gov...
I like these two lines the best:
"The fact that all color film shot on the moon was made for an Earth-based chromatic spectrum of light, not that of a vacuum -- the film 'saw'
color differently in space than it would on Earth. The colors that it recorded are thus not to be trusted in the same way that we trust color film on
Earth. You are perhaps familiar with the fact that many scientists argued for not even taking color film to the moon, citing spectral inaccuracy and
the fact that it has less acutance (sharpness) than black and white film, as well as a narrower latitude, or range of capturing relative brightness
and dimness. It did, however, have great public-relations value"
"So: I worked in my exhibition printing towards a neutral gray, isolating what I felt to be filmic issues and eliminating them. There is still color
in my prints, but filmic casts and filmic crossover has been largely eliminated; I worked to eliminate mission-specific filmic artifacts"
There's more of this stuff from him, it is too funny. He even says two dupes of the same master came out with differant colors. This is the best NASA
could come up with? They can't even make copies without messing up the colors? Good God take it to Walgreens, they'll make you some color prints!
LOL!
NASA kills me.