Obama Declares National Medical Emergency on H1N1 Flu, page 22
Pages: <<  19    20    21    22  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 91 times


reply posted on 26-10-2009 @ 09:12 PM by Peter Brake
reply to post by marg6043


You know if you take into consideration that any mutation right on the swine flu is going to make the existing vaccine completely a waste of time.

Thanks for the reply (beginning to think I am a ghost) The swine flu has got many differant directions it can go (in term of mutation) so yes it could be ineffective against a mutation I think if it stays around the H1N1 area it may have some value, but mercury stays in our bodies until we do something to get rid of it. This increases mutations.

So we could have a vaccination now, (no swine flu) it mutates comes back again and we again have no immunity, and because we have mercury in our bodies (from the vaccine) it mutates further in us and turns into a deadly disease which you now can pass on to family and friends.

Their has been a change in government and the current bunch of ministers aren't repling to my letters. I am going to try one last time with a open letter to the minister of health and the World Health Organisation just on the topic of mutation risks and see if I can get a reply.

Any info or sites on gene transfer or mutations would be useful...


reply posted on 26-10-2009 @ 09:20 PM by marg6043
reply to post by Peter Brake



You are not invisible, my friend, I am glad that you are doing something about the vaccine, but as usual money talk and you know who walks. Too much money involved in the swine flu pandemic and too much profits at stake.

Just look at the market when Obama proclaimed the swine flu to be a Nation emergency, nothing that a Little push by the president himself to get the people rolling their sleeves.

Another danger is the Squalene in the vaccine that has been sold as safe as the natural compound found in fish and humans.

Nothing but lies

MF59TM is a sub-micron oil-in-water emulsion of a squalene, polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate (TweenTM 80) and sorbitan trioleate. Squalene is a natural organic compound originally obtained from shark liver oil and a biochemical precursor to steroids. The MF59 adjuvant was developed by Chiron Corp., a company acquired by Novartis. MF59 is approved in Europe and is found in several vaccines, such as an influenza vaccine manufactured by Novartis. It has also been licensed to other companies and is being actively tested in vaccine trials. Exploring Vaccines


This type of squalene is not natural and is poison to the body.

www.whale.to...


reply posted on 26-10-2009 @ 09:45 PM by Peter Brake
reply to post by marg6043



Squalene is this the natural product? it sounds from the article that it too has been genetically altered. Which does have a bearing on my concerns of mutation risk. GMO's have been shown in themselves to be more prone to mutation. I think also that GMO's increase mutation attempts by other organisms. (No one seems to want to test this for some reason)



reply posted on 27-10-2009 @ 07:41 AM by marg6043
reply to post by Peter Brake



I am afraid is not, even when the big pharma keeps coming back to tell that is a natural oil already in the body, but what they don't tell is that Norvatis has been using a synthetic or altered type for a long time in vaccines outside the US.

While until the swine flu pandemic was prohibit in the US, all that is been changed.

One thing is to consume squalene and having it in the body natural and another having injected into the body by unnatural means.

The body react different when its injected the autoimmune system of the body attacks the injected squalene and the natural squalene in the body because it can not tell the difference between the two.

That is when the problems starts, neurological problems is one of them.


reply posted on 27-10-2009 @ 05:42 PM by Peter Brake
reply to post by marg6043



Grim thanks, I've been posting on another thread the gent I'm talking too is a vaccine maker.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Wondering if you could comment.

Originally posted by Peter Brake
I am wondering if your learned self could debunk this for me please don't pull your shots.
Antibiotics increase gene transfer (mutation) upto 10000 times.
The transgene from GMO's (genetically modified organisms) is upto 30 times more available to a virus looking for a gene to mutate with.
Heavy metals increase gene transfer rates. (their is mercury in the vaccine right?)
Finally heat shock increases gene transfer.

It seems to me the swine flu is not yet bad, scientists and government is concerned of it mutating. You could argue that the vaccine will lessen the chances of it mutating, but the mercury is stored in the body and increases gene transfer. Giving the vaccine to everyone one is helping the next flu to mutate into a real killer. (yes or no?)



No, none of this is completely true, although there are cases in bacteria. We are dealing with a virus, an RNA virus which basically means it follows absolutely no pattern for genetic mutations of anytype. Infact, there is not a single defined genetic code for any RNA virus. They actually function in groups called quasispecies, which are a group of genetically similar strains, but are still vastly genetically different. The RNA viruses are mainly only single stranded RNA, which makes them far, far less stable than double stranded DNA. Anything, and I mean anything can mutate the strains. Every time the bug infects someone, its going to mutate. This is shown through serial passages of the flu into animals over and over and over and over and over again... you can actually watch the virus become stronger and stronger each time it is passed through another animal.

That is why I care if you guys get the vaccine, because it only takes a handfull of people, to pass the bug around, giving it time in vivo to accumulate genetic changes, and possibly spawn a super flu, which there would be absolutely no vaccine for.

That's the truth behind the vaccine, no punches pulled.

I replied with

Okay I read about this, the virus is mutating at about the maximum that it can. If the virus has a range of genes to choose from and an increased ability to collect these genes then it has a increased range of mutations with which to successfully survive our immune system.

A greater range of mutated viruses means more survive and we have a greater chance for them to become more lethal.

A bit sad not to get a reply - any info?


reply posted on 28-10-2009 @ 08:12 AM by marg6043
reply to post by truthseeker84



If your brother doesn't infect the children at school, the children that has taken the vaccine in the form of the mist will do the same job, as children that are receiving the mist are allow to return to schools.

At least here in my neck of the woods, doesn't that tells you something?


reply posted on 28-10-2009 @ 12:21 PM by Seiko
reply to post by UnityFT



From my reading and study on the vaccines, no squalene is not in any of the four u.s. vaccines. I started a thread for this very reason.

Thread on vaccine ingredients

I hope this helps.
Pages: <<  19    20    21    22  >>    ^^TOP^^



Another Bug, Worse than the Last Bug - Flesh Eater Spreading
  Posted 9 days ago with 20 member flags
Superbugs spied off the Antarctic coast
  Posted 9 days ago with 14 member flags
NYC Employers Now REQUIRE Yearly H1N1 Shot - Or you\'re FIRED!
  Posted 7 days ago with 6 member flags
Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria Found in 37 U.S. States
  Posted 5 days ago with 6 member flags
Bird flu \'censorship\' decision
  Posted 12 days ago with 5 member flags
No way of stopping leak of deadly new flu, says terror chief
  Posted 4 days ago with 5 member flags
Schmallenberg Virus affects European Livestock
  Posted 4 days ago with 5 member flags
CDC: Morgellons Disease May Be Psychiatric Disorder
  Posted 16 days ago with 4 member flags